IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,972,425
Granted Patent B2
US 8,972,425 · App. 13/799,568 · Granted Mar 3, 2015

Efficient globally optimal interpretation of documents

Inventors: Christina Pavlopoulou (Menlo Park, CA); Evgeniy Bart (Sunnyvale, CA); Eric Saund (San Carlos, CA)
Assignee: Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated
G06F17/3053
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,972,425
App. No.
13/799,568
Granted
Mar 3, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method is provided for parsing a document having a plurality of lines on which items are listed spanning one or more lines. It includes: obtaining a plurality of candidates, representing hypothetical items within the document, each candidate spanning one or more lines and having a local cost representing a confidence in a quality of the candidate compared to a model; determining labeling costs for intervals of the document defined between pairs of lines, each interval containing candidates therein, each labeling cost reflecting a configuration of the candidates within the interval; identifying a best labeling for each interval based on the labeling costs determined for that interval, the best labeling corresponding to one of the configurations of the candidates within the interval; defining a global objective function; and selecting a subset of the candidates such that the global objective function is optimized, based on the identified best labelings.

Claims (30)

1. A method for parsing a document having a plurality of lines on which a series of actual items are listed, the listing of each actual item spanning one or more lines, said method comprising:

obtaining a plurality of candidates representing hypothetical items within the document, each candidate spanning one or more lines of the document and having a local cost associate therewith, said local cost representing a confidence in a quality of the candidate with respect to an item model;

determining a plurality of labeling costs for one or more intervals of the document defined between given pairs of lines of the document, each interval containing a plurality of candidates therein, each said labeling cost reflecting a different configuration of the candidates within the interval for which the labeling cost is determined;

identifying a best labeling for each interval based on a plurality of labeling costs determined for that interval, said best labeling corresponding to one of the different configurations of the candidates within the interval for which the best labeling is being identified; defining a global objective function; and selecting a subset of the candidates such that the global objective function is optimize, based on the identified best labeling.

2. The method of claim 1 , said method further comprising:

constraining the selection of the subset such that no two selected candidates in the subset spans the same line of the document.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein at least two of the candidates overlap one another.

4. The method of claim 3 , said determining further comprising:

computing a labeling cost, associated with each given candidate within the interval for which the given labeling costs are being determined, from the local cost of each given candidate and a value representing a number of lines, within the interval for which the given labeling costs are being determined, that are not spanned by the given candidate.

5. The method of claim 4 , said computing further comprising: weighting the value with a weighting parameter; and

adding the weighted value to the local cost of the given candidate for which the labeling cost is being computed.

6. The method of claim 5 , said identifying further comprising:

finding a minimum labeling cost of the computed labeling costs over the candidates contained within the interval, said minimum labeling cost corresponding to the identified best labeling.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

defining a quantity T(n,i) as an optimal cost of selecting a number n of candidates up to a line i; and

recursively computing T(n,i) as

T ( n,i )=min j ( T ( n− 1)+ C *( j,i ) for all i<=L

where L is a total number of lines in the document and C*(j,i) is the identified best labeling for the interval defined by the pair of lines j and i.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein a global optimal cost is given by min T(n,L).

9. A system for parsing a document having a plurality of lines on which a series of actual items are listed, the listing of each actual item spanning one or more lines, said system comprising: a processor operative to:

obtain a plurality of candidates representing hypothetical items within the document, each candidate spanning one or more lines of the document and having a local cost associate therewith, said local cost representing a confidence in a quality of the candidate with respect to an item model;

determine a plurality of labeling costs for one or more intervals of the document defined between given pairs of lines of the document, each interval containing a plurality of candidates therein, each said labeling cost reflecting a different configuration of the candidates within the interval for which the labeling cost is determined;

identify a best labeling for each interval based on a plurality of labeling costs determined for that interval, said best labeling corresponding to one of the different configurations of the candidates within the interval for which the best labeling is being identified; define a global objective function; and select a subset of the candidates such that the global objective function is optimize, based on the identified best labeling.

10. The system of claim 9 , said processor further operative to: constrain the selection of the subset such that no two selected candidates in the subset spans the same line of the document.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein at least two of the candidates overlap one another.

12. The system of claim 11 , said processor further operative to: compute a labeling cost, associated with each given candidate within the interval for which the given labeling costs are being determined, from the local cost of each given candidate and a value representing a number of lines, within the interval for which the given labeling costs are being determined, that are not spanned by the given candidate.

13. The system of claim 12 , said processor further operative to: weight the value with a weighting parameter; and add the weighted value to the local cost of the given candidate for which the labeling cost is being computed.

14. The system of claim 13 , said processor further operative to: find a minimum labeling cost of the computed labeling costs over the candidates contained within the interval, said minimum labeling cost corresponding to the identified best labeling.

15. The system of claim 14 , said processor further operative to: defining a quantity T(n,i) as an optimal cost of selecting a number n of candidates up to a line i; and recursively compute T(n,i) as T(n,i)=minj_i(T(n−1,j)+C*(j,i) for all i L where L is a total number of lines in the document and C*(j,i) is the identified best labeling for the interval defined by the pair of lines j and i.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein a global optimal cost is given by min T(n,L).

Assignments (9)
SECOND LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 2, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 071785/0550 →
FIRST LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 11, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070824/0001 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT RF 064760/0389 Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 068261/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066741/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 065628/0019 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVAL OF US PATENTS 9356603, 10026651, 10626048 AND INCLUSION OF US PATENT 7167871 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 064038 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 28, 2023
From: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064161/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 22, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064760/0389 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 20, 2023
From: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064038/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 13, 2013
From: PAVLOPOULOU, CHRISTINA; BART, EVGENIY; SAUND, ERIC
To: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 029984/0395 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20140280078A1 · Sep 18, 2014