IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,112,381
Granted Patent B2
US 10,112,381 · App. 13/810,738 · Granted Oct 30, 2018

Method for producing flexographic printing plates using UV-LED irradiation

Inventors: Jens Schadebrodt (Mainz, DE); Armin Becker (Großniedesheim, DE); Uwe Stebani (Flörsheim-Dalsheim, DE); Maximilian Thate (Bad Dürkheim, DE)
B41C1/1008G03F1/68G03F7/027G03F7/11G03F7/202G03F7/2024G03F7/325G03F7/36B41M2205/14G03F7/2018
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,112,381
App. No.
13/810,738
Granted
Oct 30, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for producing flexographic printing plates, using a photopolymerizable flexographic printing element having, arranged one atop another, a dimensionally stable support, a photopolymerizable, relief-forming layer, an elastomeric binder, an ethylenically unsaturated compound, and a photoinitiator, and optionally a rough, UV-transparent layer, a particulate substance, and digitally imagable layer. The method includes: (a) producing a mask by imaging the digitally imagable layer, (b) exposing the photopolymerizable, relief-forming layer through the mask with actinic light, and photopolymerizing the image regions of the layer, and (c) developing the photpolymerized layer by washing out the unphotopolymerized regions of the relief-forming layer with an organic solvent, or by thermal development. Step (b) includes (1) exposure with actinic light with an intensity of ≥100 mW/cm2 from a plurality of UV-LEDs and (2) exposure with actinic light with an intensity of <100 mW/cm2 from a UV radiation source other than UV-LEDs.

Claims (24)

1. A method for producing flexographic printing plates, using as starting material a photopolymerizable flexographic printing element which at least comprises, arranged one atop another,

a dimensionally stable support, and

at least one photopolymerizable, relief-forming layer, at least comprising an elastomeric binder, an ethylenically unsaturated compound, and a photoinitiator,

a digitally imagable layer,

and the method comprises at least the following steps:

(a) producing a mask by imaging the digitally imagable layer,

(b) exposing the photopolymerizable, relief-forming layer through the mask with actinic light, and photopolymerizing the image regions of the layer, and

(c) developing the photopolymerized layer by washing out the unphotopolymerized regions of the relief-forming layer with an organic solvent, or by thermal development, characterized in that

step (b) comprises two exposure steps (b-1) and (b-2), where in a first step (b-1) exposure with actinic light takes place with an intensity, at a surface of the flexographic printing element, of >100 mW/cm 2 from a plurality of UV-LEDs and subsequently, in a second step (b-2), exposure takes place with actinic light with an intensity of <100 mW/cm 2 from a UV radiation source other than UV-LEDs.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the radiation source used in step (b-2) is a UV tube or a UV lamp.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the UV-LEDs used in step (b-1) have an emission maximum in the wavelength range of 350-405 nm.

4. The method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the emission maximum of the UV-LEDs used in step (b-1) is at 350 nm.

5. The method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the emission maximum of the UV-LEDs used in step (b-1) is at 365 nm.

6. The method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the emission maximum of the UV-LEDs used in step (b-1) is at 375 nm.

7. The method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the emission maximum of the UV-LEDs used in step (b-1) is at 385 nm.

8. The method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the emission maximum of the UV-LEDs used in step (b-1) is at 395 nm.

9. The method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the emission maximum of the UV-LEDs used in step (b-1) is at 405 nm.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the intensity in the first exposure step (b-1) is ≥150 mW/cm 2 .

11. The method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the intensity in the second exposure step (b-2) is ≤50 mW/cm 2 .

12. The method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the radiation dose in the first exposure step (b-1) is 1 to 4 J/cm 2 and in the second exposure step (b-2) is 2 to 8 J/cm 2 .

13. The method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the digitally imagable layer is a laser-ablatable layer.

14. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein between the photopolymerizable, relief-forming layer and the digitally imagable layer there is a rough, UV-transparent layer, at least comprising a particulate substance having an average particle diameter of 0.5-50 μm.

15. The method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the printing element includes a rough, UV-transparent layer which comprises a polymeric binder or a wax.

16. The method as claimed in claim 1 including a rough, UV-transparent layer, at least comprising a particulate substance, between the relief-forming layer and the digitally imagable layer.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 4, 2024
From: FLINT GROUP GERMANY GMBH
To: XSYS GERMANY GMBH
Reel/Frame 069490/0083 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2015
From: SCHADEBRODT, JENS; BECKER, ARMIN; STEBANI, UWE; THATE, MAXIMILIAN
To: FLINT GROUP GERMANY GMBH
Reel/Frame 035005/0672 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2010 031 527 · Jul 19, 2010 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20130242276A1 · Sep 19, 2013
Cited By (1)
US 12,619,153