System and method for directing clients to optimal servers in computer networks
A communication protocol includes one or more messages passed between Web routers over a reliable transmission protocol used for inter-Web router communication. These messages include information that allows the Web routers to dynamically update mappings of client addresses or address ranges to information object repository addresses based on client-to-server distance and server load. The mappings are preferably optimal mappings of the client addresses or address ranges to the information object repository addresses and the messages report updated distances from these information object repository addresses to the client addresses or address ranges. For example, the messages may report, for each updated distance, an associated client address or address range and/or an associated anchor address of a Web router co-located with an information object repository that is the subject of the message.
1. A method, comprising:
receiving, at a first Web router, an inter-Web router communication message including an updated client-to-Web router network latency map between a client and a second Web router; and
updating at the first Web router, a client-to-Web router table based on network map precedence rules that comprise:
comparing the first Web router address associated with the client-to-Web router network latency map that is maintained in the client-to-Web router table of the first Web router with the second Web router address of the updated client-to-Web router network latency map,
comparing sequence numbers of the client-to-Web router network latency map that is maintained in the client-to-Web router table and the received message of the updated client-to-Web router network latency map,
selecting the client-to-Web router network latency map maintained in the client-to-Web router table when the first and second Web router addresses match and the client-to-Web router network latency map has a higher sequence number than the received message of the updated client-to-Web router network latency map; if the received message of the updated client-to-Web router network latency map has a higher sequence number, selecting the updated client-to-Web router network latency map to replace the client-to-Web router network latency map maintained in the client-to-Web router table of the first Web router, and
comparing the client-to-Web router distance between the client and the second Web router that is currently maintained in the client-to-Web router table of the first Web router with the client-to-Web router distance of the updated mapping in the updated client-to-Web router network latency map when the first Web router address differs from the second Web router address,
updating at the first Web router, the client-to-Web router table to include the updated client-to-Web router network latency map between the client and the second Web router if the updated client-to-Web router network latency map specifies a better client-to-Web router distance than is currently maintained in the client-to-Web router table at the first Web router;
wherein the first Web router communicates messages using a Web information Locator by Distance (WILD) protocol with neighbor Web routers including the second Web router within a virtual overlay network of the Web routers that is defined on top of an internetwork, wherein the client refers to any information object requesting device or group thereof, communicatively coupled to at least one of the first and second Web routers.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising propagating the network latency map between the client and the second Web router to neighbor Web routers of the first Web router.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising using the network latency map between the client and the second Web router to compute a client-to-server mapping.
4. The method of claim 3 further comprising updating, at the first Web router, a client-to-server table to include the client-to-server mapping if the client-to-server mapping specifies a better client-to-server distance than is currently maintained in the client-to-server table for the client.
5. The method of claim 4 further comprising propagating the client-to-server mapping to neighbor Web routers of the first Web router.
6. The method of claim 3 wherein the client-to-server mapping is computed by adding server load to distance information included in the client-to-Web router network latency map.