IP Library Granted Patent US 10,295,624
Granted Patent B2
US 10,295,624 · App. 13/918,461 · Granted May 21, 2019

Decoupling of parallel transmission arrays in magnetic resonance imaging

Inventors: Elfar Adalsteinsson (Belmont, MA); Luca Daniel (Cambridge, MA); Bastien Guerin (Cambridge, MA); Zohaib Mahmood (Cambridge, MA); Markus Vester (Nürnberg, DE); Lawrence Wald (Cambridge, MA)
Assignees: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Massachusetts General Hospital; Siemens Healthcare GmbH
G01R33/365G01R33/5612
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,295,624
App. No.
13/918,461
Granted
May 21, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of determining a decoupling matrix of a decoupling system for an array of coils of a parallel transmission magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system includes obtaining impedance matrix data for the array of coils without the decoupling system, determining, based on the impedance matrix data for the array of coils, an objective function representative of deviation from a decoupled operating condition for the array of coils in which the array of coils are decoupled via the decoupling system, and defining, with a processor, a decoupling matrix representative of a set of impedances of the decoupling system with an iterative procedure that optimizes elements of the decoupling matrix to minimize the objective function and reach the decoupled operating condition.

Claims (41)

1. A method for operating a parallel transmission magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system with an improved decoupling system, the method comprising:

obtaining impedance matrix data for an array of coils of the MRI system without the decoupling system;

determining, based on the impedance matrix data for the array of coils, an objective function representative of deviation from a decoupled operating condition for the array of coils in which the coils are decoupled via the decoupling system, wherein the objective function comprises a least squares cost function based on a difference between the decoupling matrix and a target impedance matrix representative of the array of coils in the decoupled operating condition;

using an iterative, non-linear optimization solver to determine a decoupling matrix that minimizes the objective function, wherein the decoupling matrix specifies a set of impedances of the decoupling system;

using the decoupling matrix to configure the decoupling system of the MRI system to reduce or eliminate the transmission of power from one channel to other channels of the MRI system and provide an improved power efficiency when obtaining image data using the MRI system; and

storing the image data in a non-volatile computer readable medium from which the image data can be output to a display.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each element of the decoupling matrix is representative of an impedance between a respective pair of nodes associated with the array of coils.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the impedance matrix data for the array of coils comprises determining an impedance matrix for the array of coils based on coupling measurement data for the array of coils without the decoupling system.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the non-linear optimization solver is based on a computed Jacobian matrix of the least squares cost function.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the least squares cost function is determined in accordance with a plurality of constraints on the decoupled operating condition.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the least squares cost function is determined in accordance with a constraint specifying that the set of impedance of the decoupling system are lossless.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the least squares cost function is determined in accordance with a constraint specifying that the decoupling matrix is symmetrical.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein defining the decoupling matrix comprises selecting initial values of the elements of the decoupling matrix before implementing the iterative procedure.

9. A method of configuring a parallel transmission magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system with a decoupling system for an array of coils of the parallel transmission MRI system, the method comprising:

obtaining impedance matrix data for the array of coils without the decoupling system;

determining, based on the impedance matrix data for the array of coils, a cost function representative of deviation from a decoupled operating condition for the array of coils in which the coils are decoupled via the decoupling system, wherein the objective function comprises a least squares cost function based on a difference between the decoupling matrix and a target impedance matrix representative of the array of coils in the decoupled operating condition;

using an iterative, non-linear optimization solver to determine a decoupling matrix that minimizes the objective function, wherein the decoupling matrix specifies a set of impedances of the decoupling system;

configuring the decoupling system to the array of coils based on the optimized elements of the decoupling matrix such that, when in use, the parallel transmission MRI system reduces or eliminates the transmission of power from one channel to other channels of the MRI system and provides an improved power efficiency when obtaining image data using the MRI system; and

storing the image data in a non-volatile computer readable medium from which the image data can be output to a display.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein connecting the decoupling system comprises converting the decoupling matrix into an admittance matrix.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein:

the decoupling system comprises a set of reactive elements; and

each reactive element is configured in accordance with a respective element of the admittance matrix.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein each element of the decoupling matrix is representative of an impedance between a respective pair of nodes associated with the array of coils.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein obtaining the impedance matrix data for the array of coils comprises determining an impedance matrix for the array of coils based on coupling measurement data for the array of coils without the decoupling system.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the non-linear optimization solver is based on a computed Jacobian matrix of the least squares cost function.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein the least squares cost function is determined in accordance with a plurality of constraints on the decoupled operating condition.

16. The method of claim 9 , wherein the least squares cost function is determined in accordance with a constraint specifying that the set of impedance of the decoupling system are lossless.

17. The method of claim 9 , wherein the least squares cost function is determined in accordance with a constraint specifying that the decoupling matrix is symmetrical.

18. The method of claim 9 , wherein defining the decoupling matrix comprises selecting initial values of the elements of the decoupling matrix before implementing the iterative procedure.

19. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system comprising:

a plurality of transmitters to generate a parallel transmission radio frequency (RF) pulse;

an array of coils coupled to the plurality of transmitters to apply the parallel transmission RF pulse to a subject; and

a decoupling system connected to the plurality of transmitters and the array of coils and configured in accordance with a decoupling matrix to attain a decoupled operating condition for the array of coils;

wherein each element of the decoupling matrix is representative of an impedance between a respective pair of nodes, each node being associated with either a respective one of the transmitters or a respective one of the coils;

wherein the elements of the decoupling matrix are optimized using a non-linear optimization solver to minimize a least squares cost function based on impedance matrix data for the array of coils without the decoupling system, the least squares cost function being based on a difference between the decoupling matrix and a target impedance matrix representative of the array of coils in the decoupled operating condition, and

wherein operation of the MRI system using the decoupling matrix reduces or eliminates the transmission of power from one channel to other channels of the MRI system and provides an improved power efficiency.

20. The MRI system of claim 19 , wherein:

the decoupling system comprises a set of reactive elements;

each reactive element connects a respective pair of nodes associated with the plurality of transmitters and the array of coils; and

each reactive element is configured in accordance with a respective element of an admittance matrix derived from the decoupling matrix.

Assignments (7)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 066088 FRAME: 0256. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jan 17, 2024
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 071178/0246 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2023
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 066088/0256 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Feb 7, 2020
From: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 051845/0824 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2019
From: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
Reel/Frame 048505/0793 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2014
From: ADALSTEINSSON, ELFAR; DANIEL, LUCA; GUERIN, BASTIEN; MAHMOOD, ZOHAIB
To: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 033187/0889 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2014
From: VESTER, MARKUS
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 033187/0782 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2014
From: WALD, LAWRENCE
To: MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
Reel/Frame 033187/0972 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61807177 · Apr 1, 2013
Related Publication 20140292337A1 · Oct 2, 2014