IP Library Granted Patent US 9,677,140
Granted Patent B2
US 9,677,140 · App. 14/047,949 · Granted Jun 13, 2017

Molecular diagnostic test for cancer

Inventors: Jude O'Donnell (Galbally, GB); Max Bylesjo (Glasgow, GB); Fionnuala Patterson (Greenisland, GB); Steve Deharo (Hillsborough, GB); Laura A. Hill (Lisburn, GB); Katherine E. Keating (Magherafelt, GB); Timothy Davison (Hillsborough, GB); Vitali Proutski (Hillsborough, GB); Denis Paul Harkin (Dromore, GB); Richard Kennedy (Belfast, GB); Nicolas Goffard (Belfast, GB)
Assignee: ALMAC DIAGONOSTICS LIMITED
C12Q1/6886C12Q1/6876G06F19/20G06F19/24C12Q2600/106C12Q2600/112C12Q2600/158C40B30/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,677,140
App. No.
14/047,949
Granted
Jun 13, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and compositions are provided for the identification of a molecular diagnostic test for cancer. The test defines a novel DNA damage repair deficient molecular subtype and enables classification of a patient within this subtype. The present invention can be used to determine whether patients with cancer are clinically responsive or non-responsive to a therapeutic regimen prior to administration of any chemotherapy. This test may be used in different cancer types and with different drugs that directly or indirectly affect DNA damage or repair, such as many of the standard cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs currently in use. In particular, the present invention is directed to the use of certain combinations of predictive markers, wherein the expression of the predictive markers correlates with responsiveness or non-responsiveness to a therapeutic regimen.

Claims (14)

1. A method of treating a cancer patient with a DNA-damage therapeutic agent, comprising administering the DNA-damage therapeutic agent to the patient, wherein, prior to administration of the therapeutic agent, the patient has been determined to overexpress either (i) the combined level of the mRNAs for APOL3 and at least one of the other genes of Table 2B, (ii) the combined level of the mRNAs for IDO1 and at least one of the other genes of Table 2B, or (iii) the combined level of the mRNAs for CXCL10 and at least one of the other genes of Table 2B.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the cancer is chosen from melanoma, colon cancer, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the cancer is breast cancer.

4. The method according to any one of claims 1 - 3 , wherein the DNA-damage therapeutic agent comprises one or more substances selected from the group consisting of: a DNA damaging agent, a DNA repair targeted therapy, an inhibitor of DNA damage signaling, an inhibitor of DNA damage induced cell cycle arrest, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, an inhibitor of DNA synthesis, and a heat shock protein inhibitor.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the DNA damaging agent comprises one or more of an anthracycline, a cisplatin, a carboplatin, a cyclophosphamide, an oxaliplatin, a busulphan, an irinotecan, a topotecan, an etoposide, a doxorubicin, an epirubicin, and ionising radiation.

6. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the cancer is breast cancer and the DNA-damage therapeutic agent comprises a combination of a 5-fluorouracil, an anthracycline, and a cyclophosphamide.

7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the anthracycline is epirubicin.

8. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the anthracyline is doxorubicin.

9. The method according to claim 6 , wherein a taxane is co-administered with the DNA-damage therapeutic agent.

10. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the cancer is ovarian cancer and the DNA-damage therapeutic agent comprises a platinum-containing agent.

11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein DNA-damage therapeutic agent is co-administered with a taxane.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein, prior to administration of the therapeutic agent, the patient has been determined to overexpress the combined level of the mRNAs for APOL3 and at least one of the other genes of Table 2B.

13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein, prior to administration of the therapeutic agent, the patient has been determined to overexpress the combined level of the mRNAs for IDO1 and at least one of the other genes of Table 2B.

14. The method according to claim 1 , wherein, prior to administration of the therapeutic agent, the patient has been determined to overexpress the combined level of the mRNAs for CXCL10 and at least one of the other genes of Table 2B.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 20, 2019
From: ALMAC DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED
To: ALMAC DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 048647/0068 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Oct 8, 2013
From: O'DONNELL, JUDE; BYLESJO, MAX; PATTERSON, FIONNUALA; DEHARO, STEVE; HILL, LAURA A.; KEATING, KATHERINE E.; DAVISON, TIMOTHY; PROUTSKI, VITALI; HARKIN, DENIS PAUL; KENNEDY, RICHARD; GOFFARD, NICOLAS
To: ALMAC DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 031359/0502 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 13821404
Provisional Application 61383201 · Sep 15, 2010
Provisional Application 61490039 · May 25, 2011
Related Publication 20140031260A1 · Jan 30, 2014