IP Library Granted Patent US 9,411,943
Granted Patent B2
US 9,411,943 · App. 14/062,007 · Granted Aug 9, 2016

Authentication method for authenticating a first party to a second party

Inventors: Maurice Jerome Justin Jean-Baptiste Maes (Eindhoven, NL); Boris Skoric ('s-Hertogenbosch, NL); Antonius Adriaan Maria Staring (Eindhoven, NL); Johan Cornelis Talstra (Eindhoven, NL)
Assignee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
G06F21/105G06F21/10G06F21/33G06F21/44G06F2221/0764G06F2221/0771G06F2221/2129G06F2221/2137
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,411,943
App. No.
14/062,007
Granted
Aug 9, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

An authentication method authenticates a first party to a second party, where an operation is performed on condition that the authentication succeeds. If the first party is not authenticated, then if the first party qualifies for a sub-authorization, the operation is still performed. Further, a device that includes a first memory area holding a comparison measure, which is associated with time, and which is also used in said authentication procedure, a second memory area holding a limited list of other parties which have been involved in an authentication procedure with the device, and a third memory area, holding compliance certificates concerning parties of said list.

Claims (20)

1. An authentication method for authenticating a first party to a second party, where an operation is performed on condition that the authentication succeeds, comprising the steps of:

providing at least one hardware processor for performing the steps of:

verifying whether the first party is authenticated or not by verifying if a groups certificate(GC) of the first party is out of date or not,

if the first party is determined not to be authenticated based on said verification step, then

(i) qualifying the first party for a sub-authorization, and

(ii) setting a grace-counter to an initialized predetermined number equal to a number of times that the first party is being sub-authorized,

wherein, if the first party qualifies for the sub-authorization, the operation is still performed and the grace counter is decremented from the initialized predetermined number, and if the first party is authenticated, then setting the grace counter to the predetermined number,

wherein said first party's groups certificate (GC) is a concise proof that one or more groups to which the first party belongs, has not been revoked,

and wherein said step of verifying whether the first party is authenticated or not by verifying if the first party's groups certificate is out of date or not, further comprises comparing a date of issuance measure of the first party's groups certificate with a comparison measure of the second party, wherein said first party is authenticated only if it is determined by the comparison that the date of issuance measure of the first party's groups certificate is not out of date.

2. The authentication method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said qualifying of the first party for a sub-authorization is dependent on the result of said comparison of the date of issuance measure of the first party's groups certificate with a comparison measure.

3. The authentication method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the comparison measure comprises a range of allowed validity numbers.

4. The authentication method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the first party is non-qualified for said sub-authorization if the date of issuance measure of the first party's groups certificate is lower than a minimum validity number of said range of allowed validity numbers.

5. The authentication method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein if a compliance certificate indicates a non-compliance of the first party, the first party is qualified for the sub-authorization provided that the date of issuance measure of the first party's groups certificate is higher than or equal to a maximum validity number of said range of validity numbers.

6. The authentication method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein a maximum validity number of said range of allowed validity numbers is a current validity number stored at the second party.

7. The authentication method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein a minimum validity number of said range of allowed validity numbers is a previous validity number stored at the second party.

8. The authentication method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the operation comprises accessing content.

9. The authentication method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein said content is stored on an optical disc.

10. The authentication method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said first party is a software application and said second party is a device.

11. The authentication method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the second party holds a limited list of first parties, and wherein the authentication method further comprises the steps of:

updating, at the second party, a comparison measure, and in conjunction with said updating, storing, at the second party, an updated set of compliance certificates containing compliance certificates concerning first parties on said limited list of first parties.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 6, 2024
From: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
To: MEDIA CONTENT PROTECTION LLC
Reel/Frame 068200/0378 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 30, 2024
From: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 067590/0566 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 04102536 · Jun 4, 2004 · regional
Continuity (2)
Continuation 11569974
Related Publication 20140053279A1 · Feb 20, 2014