IP Library Granted Patent US 9,825,608
Granted Patent B2
US 9,825,608 · App. 14/150,392 · Granted Nov 21, 2017

Method and apparatus for detecting RF field strength

Inventors: Shahriar Rokhsaz (Austin, TX); Edwin de Angel (Austin, TX)
Assignee: RFMICRON, INC.
H03H7/40H03J3/20H04B5/0037H03J2200/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,825,608
App. No.
14/150,392
Granted
Nov 21, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for detecting RF field strength. A field strength reference generator develops a field strength reference current as a function of a field strength of a received RF signal; and a field strength quantizer develops a digital field-strength value indicative of the field strength reference current. In one embodiment, detected field strength is used to dynamically vary the impedance of a tank circuit whereby, over time, induced current is maximized.

Claims (42)

1. In an RF communication system in which an external transmitter electromagnetically couples a signal of predetermined frequency, f C , to a receiver separated by an air gap from the transmitter, a method for dynamically maximizing a received power transfer by adjusting a tuning circuit of the receiver, the tuning circuit comprising an antenna and a capacitor, a capacitance of which can be varied in a selected one of first and second directions, the method comprising the steps of:

(1) selecting one of said first and second directions;

(2) capturing a first current response of the tuning circuit to the signal transmitted by the transmitter;

(3) varying the capacitor in said selected first or second direction;

(4) comparing the captured first response to a second current response of the tuning circuit to the signal currently transmitted by the transmitter;

(5) if the comparison made in step 4 indicates that the second current response is weaker than the captured first response, selecting the other of said directions; and

(6) returning to step 2.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first direction is selected to increase the capacitance of the variable capacitor, and the second direction is selected to decrease the capacitance of the variable capacitor.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein step 1 is further characterized as:

(1) selecting a predetermined one of said first and second directions.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein step 6 is further characterized as:

(6) if the comparison made in step 4 indicates that the difference between the current response and the captured response is greater than a predetermined minimum, returning to step 2.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein step 6 is further characterized as:

(6) if the comparison made in step 4 indicates that the difference between the current response and the captured response is greater than a predetermined minimum, selectively returning to step 2.

6. In an RF communication system in which an external transmitter electromagnetically couples a signal of predetermined frequency, f C , to a receiver separated by an electrically non-conducting gap from the transmitter, a method for dynamically maximizing a received power transfer by adjusting a tuning circuit of the receiver, the tuning circuit comprising an antenna and a capacitor, a capacitance of which can be varied in a selected one of first and second directions, the method comprising the steps of:

(1) selecting one of said first and second directions;

(2) capturing a first current response of the tuning circuit to the signal transmitted by the transmitter;

(3) varying the capacitor in said selected first or second direction;

(4) comparing the captured first response to a second current response of the tuning circuit to the signal currently transmitted by the transmitter;

(5) if the comparison made in step 4 indicates that the second current response is weaker than the captured first response, selecting the other of said directions; and

(6) returning to step 2.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the first direction is selected to increase the capacitance of the variable capacitor, and the second direction is selected to decrease the capacitance of the variable capacitor.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein step 1 is further characterized as:

(1) selecting a predetermined one of said first and second directions.

9. The method of claim 6 wherein step 6 is further characterized as:

(6) if the comparison made in step 4 indicates that the difference between the current response and the captured response is greater than a predetermined minimum, returning to step 2.

10. The method of claim 6 wherein step 6 is further characterized as:

(6) if the comparison made in step 4 indicates that the difference between the current response and the captured response is greater than a predetermined minimum, selectively returning to step 2.

11. In an RF communication system in which an external transmitter electromagnetically couples a signal of predetermined frequency, f 0 to a receiver separated by an electrically non-conducting medium from the transmitter, a method for dynamically maximizing a received power transfer by adjusting a tuning circuit of the receiver, the tuning circuit comprising an antenna and a capacitor, a capacitance of which can be varied in a selected one of first and second directions, the method comprising the steps of:

(1) selecting one of said first and second directions;

(2) capturing a first current response of the tuning circuit to the signal transmitted by the transmitter;

(3) varying the capacitor in said selected first or second direction;

(4) comparing the captured first response to a second current response of the tuning circuit to the signal currently transmitted by the transmitter;

(5) if the comparison made in step 4 indicates that the second current response is weaker than the captured first response, selecting the other of said directions; and

(6) returning to step 2.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the first direction is selected to increase the capacitance of the variable capacitor, and the second direction is selected to decrease the capacitance of the variable capacitor.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein step 1 is further characterized as:

(1) selecting a predetermined one of said first and second directions.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein step 6 is further characterized as:

(6) if the comparison made in step 4 indicates that the difference between the current response and the captured response is greater than a predetermined minimum, returning to step 2.

15. The method of claim 11 wherein step 6 is further characterized as:

(6) if the comparison made in step 4 indicates that the difference between the current response and the captured response is greater than a predetermined minimum, selectively returning to step 2.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 29, 2021
From: KLDC PARTNERS LP; JDFWC, LTD.; LANEY, KIRK S; PAULOS HOLDINGS, LTD.; PAULOS, JOHN; ROKHSAZ, SHAHRIAR; MIRFAKHRAEI, SEYEDEH ZINAT; CARLO STRIPPOLI 2012 FAMILY TRUST; JACOBSSON, JACOB; KINGSLEY NOELLE INVESTMENTS, LLC; SUN FABER CAPITAL, LTD.; RICH POWER MANAGEMENT, LTD.; POLITTE CAPITAL GROUP, LLC
To: RFMICRON, INC.
Reel/Frame 056105/0455 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 10, 2020
From: RFMICRON, INC.
To: KLDC PARTNERS LP; JDFWC, LTD.; LANEY, KIRK S; PAULOS HOLDINGS, LTD.; PAULOS, JOHN; ROKHSAZ, SHAHRIAR; MIRFAKHRAEI, SEYEDEH ZINAT; CARLO STRIPPOLI 2012 FAMILY TRUST; JACOBSSON, JACOB; KINGSLEY NOELLE INVESTMENTS, LLC; SUN FABER CAPITAL, LTD.; RICH POWER MANAGEMENT, LTD.; POLITTE CAPITAL GROUP, LLC
Reel/Frame 052371/0082 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2017
From: ROKHSAZ, SHAHRIAR; DE ANGEL, EDWIN
To: RFMICRON, INC.
Reel/Frame 043705/0222 →
Continuity (7)
Division 13209420 · Aug 14, 2011
Continuation In Part 12462331 · Aug 1, 2009
Division 11601085 · Nov 18, 2006
Provisional Application 61428170 · Dec 29, 2010
Provisional Application 61485732 · May 13, 2011
Related Publication 20140120836A1 · May 1, 2014
Related Publication 20170302247A9 · Oct 19, 2017