IP Library Granted Patent US 9,065,517
Granted Patent B2
US 9,065,517 · App. 14/171,736 · Granted Jun 23, 2015

Implementing blind tuning in hybrid MIMO RF beamforming systems

Inventors: Haim Harel (New York, NY); Eduardo Abreu (Allentown, PA); Kenneth Kludt (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Magnolia Broadband Inc.
H04B7/086H04B7/0413H04B7/0874
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,065,517
App. No.
14/171,736
Granted
Jun 23, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and a method for applying a blind tuning process to M antennas coupled via N beamformers to a multiple input multiple output (MIMO) receiving system having N channels, wherein M>N, are provided herein. The method includes the following steps: Periodically measuring channel fading rate at a baseband level to determine the number of antennas L out of K antennas connected to each one of the beamformers, to be combined at each one of the N beamformers; assigning the antennas to the subset L according to some criteria such as best quality indicator; repeatedly applying a tuning process to L antennas in each one of the N beamformers.

Claims (56)

1. A method comprising:

receiving multiple input multiple output (MIMO) radio frequency (RF) signals through M antennas coupled via N beamformers to a MIMO receiving system having N channels, wherein M>N;

measuring channel fading rate at a baseband level;

grading each one of K antennas, based on their total data throughput coming from various data streams, wherein the total data throughput is represented by a total data throughput indicator (TDTI);

determining a number of antennas L to be combined out of the K antennas of each one of the N beamformers, based on the measured fading rate, wherein the selecting of said specific subset L is based on the total data throughput grades of the K antennas; and

repeatedly applying a tuning process to L antennas at each of the N beamformers, wherein the tuning process comprises adjusting a phase of each of said L antennas to maximize a TDTI.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising selecting a specific subset L of the K antennas on each one of the N beamformers, based on quality indicators.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the quality indicator is respective contribution to total data rate.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the channel fading rate is represented by measuring a mobility monitoring indicator (MMI).

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the TDTI is derivable via a lookup table based on a channel quality indicator (CQI) criterion and measured signal to noise plus interference ratio (SINR).

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the grading of each one of the K antennas is carried out by a process comprising:

isolating a given antenna and registering the reported signal to noise plus interference ratio (SINR) of each layer;

converting each SINR to channel quality indicator (CQI) and then to Data Rate via said lookup table; and

summing the Data Rates to provide total data throughput indicator (TDTI) grading, while said process is carried out with K or less antennas at the other beamformers.

7. The method according to claim 6 , further comprising a step of updating the SINR conversion in the lookup table in a case a new CQI report arrives.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said tuning process includes at least one round of coarse tuning process.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said tuning process includes a fine tuning process.

10. A method comprising:

receiving multiple input multiple output (MIMO) radio frequency (RF) signals through M antennas coupled via N beamformers to a MIMO receiving system having N channels, wherein M>N;

measuring channel fading rate at a baseband level;

determining a number of antennas L to be combined out of K antennas of each one of the N beamformers, based on the measured fading rate; and

repeatedly applying a tuning process to L antennas at each of the N beamformers, wherein said tuning process includes at least one round of coarse tuning process, said coarse tuning process comprising:

selecting best graded antenna as an anchor;

combining the anchor with the second best graded antenna and measure Total Data Throughput Indicator (TDTI);

flipping the phase of the second best antenna by approximately 180°, and measuring the TDTI;

choosing the better TDTI as preferred coarse phase;

combining the next best graded antenna with the previously combined antennas and measure the TDTI;

flipping the phase of the next best graded antenna and measure TDTI, and selecting the better TDTI as preferred coarse phase for the next best graded antenna;

repeating the adding of antennas to the combiner per their grading until all L antennas are added.

11. A system comprising

M antennas;

N beamformers connected to the M antennas;

a multiple input multiple output (MIMO) receiving system having N channels, connected to the N beamformers, wherein M>N; and

an antenna subset selection and tuning module configured to:

measure channel fading rate at a baseband level;

grade each one of the K antennas, based on their total data throughput coming from various data streams, wherein the total data throughput is represented by a total data throughput indicator (TDTI);

determine a number of antennas L≦K to be combined at each one of the N beamformers, wherein K is a number of antennas connected to each one of the beamformers, based on the measured fading rate, wherein the selecting of said specific subset L is based on the total data throughput grades of the K antennas; and

repeatedly apply a tuning process to L antennas at each of the N beamformers, wherein the tuning process comprises adjusting a phase of each of said L antennas to maximize a TDTI.

12. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the antenna subset selection and tuning module is further configured to select a specific subset L of the K antennas on each one of the N beamformers, based on quality indicators.

13. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the quality indicator is respective contribution to total data rate.

14. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the channel fading rate is represented by measuring a mobility monitoring indicator (MMI).

15. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the TDTI is derivable via a lookup table based on a channel quality indicator (CQI) criterion and measured signal to noise plus interference ratio (SINR).

16. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the grading of each one of the K antennas is carried out by a process comprising:

isolating a given antenna and registering the reported signal to noise plus interference ratio (SINR) of each layer;

converting each SINR to CQI and then to Data Rate via said lookup table; and

summing the Data Rates to provide total data throughput indicator (TDTI) grading, while said process is carried out with K or less antennas at the other beamformers.

17. The system according to claim 16 , wherein the antennas subset selection and tuning module is further configured to update the SINR conversion in the lookup table in a case a new CQI report arrives.

18. The system according to claim 11 , wherein said tuning process includes at least one round of coarse tuning process.

19. The system according to claim 11 , wherein said coarse tuning process comprises:

selecting best graded antenna as an anchor;

combining the anchor with the second best graded antenna and measure Total Data Throughput Indicator (TDTI);

flipping the phase of the second best antenna by approximately 180°, and measuring the TDTI;

choosing the better TDTI as preferred coarse phase;

combining the next best graded antenna with the previously combined antennas and measure the TDTI;

flipping the phase of the next best graded antenna and measure TDTI, and selecting the better TDTI as preferred coarse phase for the next best graded antenna;

repeating the adding of antennas to the combiner per their grading until all L antennas are added.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 27, 2020
From: MAGNOLIA BROADBAND, INC.
To: MAGNOTOD LLC
Reel/Frame 052761/0319 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 11, 2014
From: MAGNOLIA BROADBAND, INC.
To: MAGNOTOD LLC
Reel/Frame 033720/0538 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2014
From: HAREL, HAIM; ABREU, EDUARDO; KLUDT, KENNETH
To: MAGNOLIA BROADBAND INC.
Reel/Frame 033034/0335 →
Continuity (9)
Continuation 13770255 · Feb 19, 2013
Continuation In Part 13630146 · Sep 28, 2012
Continuation In Part 13770255 · Feb 19, 2013
Provisional Application 61652743 · May 29, 2012
Provisional Application 61657999 · Jun 11, 2012
Provisional Application 61665592 · Jun 28, 2012
Provisional Application 61658015 · Jun 11, 2012
Provisional Application 61671408 · Jul 13, 2012
Related Publication 20140219404A1 · Aug 7, 2014