Maintenance planning optimization for repairable items based on prognostics and health monitoring data
Maintenance interventions are planned using RUL (Remaining Useful Life) estimations obtained from a PHM (Prognostics and Health Monitoring) system as well as estimations of spare parts availability. PHM information is used to verify whether spare parts will be available when the next failures are expected to occur, and expected RUL of a component or system based on a set of measurements collected from the aircraft systems can be used to schedule repair times that do not conflict with other repairs to avoid wait time and maximize repair shop capacity utilization.
1. A system for scheduling repair of a component of an aircraft before the component fails, comprising:
at least one processor; and
a non-transitory memory coupled to the processor, the non-transitory memory storing program control instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to:
(a) use a degradation value to estimate the probability that a component of an aircraft will fail;
(b) estimate how long it will take to repair the aircraft component;
(c) determine availability of resources for repairing the aircraft component including whether said repair resources will be needed to repair the same component of other aircraft; and
(d) schedule repair of the aircraft component in advance of (a) when the aircraft component fails and (b) attaining a failure threshold based on the degradation index, to minimize conflicts of the scheduled repair of the aircraft component with repairs of other aircraft components to better use repair shop availability and avoid conflicts when the repair shop is already at or has exceeded capacity.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor is configured to determine the availability of resources for repairing the aircraft component by calculating the number of aircraft grounded waiting for a component X at instant t, G X (t), as a function of R X (t) and S X as follows:
G
x
(
t
)
=
{
0
;
R
x
(
t
)
≤
S
x
R
x
(
t
)
-
S
x
;
R
x
(
t
)
>
S
x
where S X is the number of spare parts of component X and R X (t) is the number of components X in a repair shop at instant t.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor is further configured to estimate component failure by calculating MTTR (Mean Time to Repair) of the component.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor is further configured to determine the availability of resources for repairing the aircraft component by anticipating replacement and automatically scheduling maintenance in advance not only of when the component will fail, but also in advance of attainment of the failure threshold based on the degradation index, in order to optimize use of repair shop availability and avoid conflicts when the repair shop is already at or has exceeded full capacity to repair said component.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor is further configured to determine the availability of resources for repairing the aircraft component by taking into account the amount of time it takes to repair the component and to generate a repair schedule in which the maximum number of said components in the repair shop never exceeds a predetermined limit on a repair shop's capacity to repair said component.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor is further configured to determine how long it will take to repair the aircraft component by extrapolating a curve generated by the evolution of the degradation index over time to estimate a time interval in which the failure is predicted to occur.
7. The system of claim 6 wherein the estimate is represented as a probability density function.
8. A method for scheduling repair of an aircraft component before the component fails, comprising:
using at least one processor, predicting when a component of an aircraft will fail based at least in part by calculating a degradation index and a statistical probability distribution;
using the processor, estimating how long it will take to repair the aircraft component;
using the processor, determining availability of resources for repairing the aircraft component including predicting whether said repair resources will be needed to repair the same component for other aircraft; and
using the processor, scheduling repair of the aircraft component before (a) the aircraft component fails and (b) attains a failure threshold based on the degradation index, to minimize conflicts of the scheduled repair of the aircraft component with repairs of other aircraft components to better use repair shop availability, so the scheduled repair does not conflict with repair of the component for other aircraft when the repair shop is already at or has exceeded capacity.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the processor determines availability of resources for repairing the aircraft component by calculating the number of aircraft grounded waiting for a component X at instant t, G X (t), as a function of R X (t) and S X as follows:
G
x
(
t
)
=
{
0
;
R
x
(
t
)
≤
S
x
R
x
(
t
)
-
S
x
;
R
x
(
t
)
>
S
x
where S X is the number of spare parts of component X and R X (t) is the number of components X stocked by at least one repair shop at instant t.
10. The method of claim 8 further including the processor predicting when the component will fail by estimating MTTR (Mean Time to Repair) of the component.
11. The method of claim 8 wherein the processor determines availability of resources for repairing the aircraft component including predicting whether said repair resources will be needed to repair the component for other aircraft by anticipating replacements and automatically scheduling maintenance in advance not only of when the component will fail, but also in advance of attainment of the failure threshold based on the degradation index, in order to optimize use of repair shop availability and avoid conflicts between the repair shop repairing a particular component when it is already at or has exceeded full capacity to repair such components.
12. The method of claim 8 further including the processor taking into account the amount of time it takes to repair the component and to generate a repair schedule in which the maximum number of the components in the repair shop never exceeds a predetermined limit on a repair shop's capacity to repair the component.
13. The method of claim 8 wherein the processor extrapolates a curve generated by the evolution of the degradation index over time to estimate a time interval in which the failure is likely to occur.
14. The method of claim 8 wherein the estimate is represented as a probability density function.