IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,445,763
Granted Patent B2
US 10,445,763 · App. 14/231,460 · Granted Oct 15, 2019

Automated promotion forecasting and methods therefor

Inventors: David Moran (Palo Alto, CA); Michael Montero (Palo Alto, CA)
Assignee: EVERSIGHT, INC.
G06Q30/0244G06F3/0425G06Q30/02G06Q30/0269G06Q30/0277G06T1/0021G06T3/0006
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,445,763
App. No.
14/231,460
Granted
Oct 15, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and apparatus for implementing forward looking optimizing promotions by administering, in large numbers and iteratively, test promotions formulated using highly granular test variables on purposefully segmented subpopulations. The plurality of test promotions are automatically proposed. The responses from individuals in the subpopulations are received and analyzed. The analysis result is employed to subsequently formulate a general public promotion.

Claims (24)

1. A computer-implemented method for performing promotion optimization that is performed by a promotion optimization system, containing one or more processors, a promotion module, an administration module, and a monitoring module, the method, comprising:

receiving a set of variable values for a product, a desired channel, and a criteria;

accessing an experimental knowledge database of previous promotions, wherein the previous promotions have prior variable values and results on the criteria;

clustering variables by promotional concept, wherein the promotional concepts include promotion type, presence of a person in a promotion image, gender of the person, promotion format, promotion channel, and numerosity behavioral economic principle using machine learned clustering algorithms;

aggregating the promotional concepts into pools of a given size by shared attributes;

calculating an impact each value of the set of variable values has on the criteria by comparison of the prior variable value to a baseline experiment information for the set of variable values, and the prior variable value's associated result, that is in the same pool as the each value of the set of variable values;

generating a plurality of test promotions automatically for the channel;

aggregating the impact of the values of each test promotion to generate a predicted result for each test promotion;

ranking the plurality of test promotions by predicted result against the criteria;

proposing a subset of the plurality of test promotions with the highest ranking to improve administration of the plurality of test promotions; and

administering the proposed subset of test promotions in real-time wherein the real-time administration of test promotions includes concurrent testing of the plurality of test promotions at the same time to a plurality consumers, to improve selection of the variable values such that impactful values are tested.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the desired channel includes social media sites, in-video placement, emails, mobile browser, and loyalty accounts.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the criteria is one of increased volume, increased profitability, and increased customer awareness.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the criteria may further include promotion type.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the promotion types includes percent off, amount off, and buy one quantity get a second quantity free.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein insights are isolated effects of each variable value in the previous promotions to determine if a combination of variable values will result in a desired response.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the previous promotions are stored in the experimental knowledge database of past multivariate promotions and their performance.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the performance for each multivariate promotion is compared against a baseline experiment.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the baseline experiment is tested in the same time period as experimental promotions.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the classifying is by type of promotion, gender of the person in an image, existence of a human in the image, format of promotion, and channel of promotion.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the classification uses behavioral economic principle.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a predicted percentage lift for a particular variable value of a past promotion.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising aggregating and weighting the predicted percentage lift for each variable value to arrive at a predicted result for the test promotion.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the given size of the pools is configurable by a user.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2023
From: EVERSIGHT, INC.
To: MAPLEBEAR INC. (DBA INSTACART)
Reel/Frame 063529/0881 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 4, 2016
From: MORAN, DAVID; MONTERO, MICHAEL
To: EVERSIGHT, INC.
Reel/Frame 039342/0266 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 14209851 · Mar 13, 2014
Provisional Application 61780630 · Mar 13, 2013
Related Publication 20140330636A1 · Nov 6, 2014