IP Library Patent Application 14295430
Patent Application
App. No. 14/295,430

NETWORK OPTIMIZATION OF PEER-TO-PEER TELECONFERENCING

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
14/295,430
Abstract

Systems ( 100 ) and methods ( 900 ) for controlling distribution of media streams during a teleconference. The methods comprise: configuring, by a central controller ( 102 ), a media stream flow between user nodes ( 106 - 132 ) which are participating or are to participate in the teleconference based on one or more first parameters; periodically determining, by the central controller, an end-to-end latency for each pair of the user nodes during the teleconference; and dynamically re-configuring, by the central controller, the media stream flow between the user nodes participating in the teleconference in view of the end-to-end latencies which were previously determined. The media stream flow is configured/re-configured by ordering the user nodes into a daisy chain structure ( 300, 400 ), a tree structure ( 500, 600, 602 ) or a hybrid structure ( 700, 800 ). The structure in which the user nodes are configured can be different than the structure in which the user nodes are subsequently re-configured.

Claims (27)

1 . A method for controlling distribution of media streams during a teleconference, comprising:

configuring, by a central controller, a media stream flow between user nodes which are participating or are to participate in the teleconference based on one or more first parameters;

periodically determining, by the central controller, an end-to-end latency for each pair of the user nodes during the teleconference; and

dynamically re-configuring, by the central controller, the media stream flow between the user nodes participating in the teleconference in view of the end-to-end latencies which were previously determined.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first parameters comprise an end-to-end latency for each said pair of user nodes and an active/inactive status of each user node.

3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the media stream flow is configured or re-configured by ordering the user nodes into a daisy chain in which each user node sends media streams exclusively to a first user node and receives media streams exclusively from a second different user node.

4 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the media streams received by each user node are absent of a media stream generated by that user node.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the media stream flow is configured or re-configured by ordering the user nodes into a tree structure in which at least a first user node having an active status communicates a media stream generated thereby to at least one second user node having an inactive status.

6 . The method according to claim 5 , wherein the second user node acts as a relay node by forwarding the media stream generated by the first user node to at least one third user node having an inactive status.

7 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the media stream flow is configured or re-configured by ordering the user nodes into a hybrid structure in which at least first and second user nodes are ordered into a daisy chain architecture for distribution of media streams during the teleconference and at least third and fourth user nodes are ordered into a tree architecture for distribution of media streams during the teleconference.

8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the user nodes are configured into a first Network Node Communication (“NNC”) architecture for distribution of media streams during the teleconference, and subsequently re-configured into a second different NNC architecture for distribution of media streams during the teleconference.

9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the media stream flow is dynamically re-configured in response to at least one of a change in a number of participants of the teleconference, a change in an active/inactive status of at least one user node, a change in an end-to-end latency of at least one user node, a change in a quality of at least one of the media streams, and a change in at least one user node's capacity to handle a portion of a media stream load of the teleconference.

10 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising dynamically changing a quality of a media stream associated with one of the user nodes during the teleconference.

11 . A teleconference system, comprising:

a central controller controlling distribution of media streams during a teleconference by

configuring a media stream flow between user nodes which are participating or are to participate in the teleconference based on one or more first parameters,

periodically determining an end-to-end latency for each pair of the user nodes during the teleconference, and

dynamically re-configuring the media stream flow between the user nodes participating in the teleconference in view of the end-to-end latencies which were previously determined.

12 . The teleconference system according to claim 11 , wherein the first parameters comprise an end-to-end latency for each said pair of user nodes and an active/inactive status of each user node.

13 . The teleconference system according to claim 11 , wherein the media stream flow is configured or re-configured by ordering the user nodes into a daisy chain in which each user node sends media streams exclusively to a first user node and receives media streams exclusively from a second different user node.

14 . The teleconference system according to claim 11 , wherein the media streams received by each user node are absent of a media stream generated by that user node.

15 . The teleconference system according to claim 11 , wherein the media stream flow is configured or re-configured by ordering the user nodes into a tree structure in which at least a first user node having an active status communicates a media stream generated thereby to at least one second user node having an inactive status.

16 . The teleconference system according to claim 15 , wherein the second user node is ordered by the central controller to act as a relay node by forwarding the media stream generated by the first user node to at least one third user node having an inactive status.

17 . The teleconference system according to claim 11 , wherein the media stream flow is configured or re-configured by ordering the user nodes into a hybrid structure in which at least first and second user nodes are ordered into a daisy chain architecture for distribution of media streams during the teleconference and at least third and fourth user nodes are ordered into a tree architecture for distribution of media streams during the teleconference.

18 . The teleconference system according to claim 11 , wherein the central controller configures the user nodes into a first Network Node Communication (“NNC”) architecture for distribution of media streams during the teleconference, and subsequently re-configures the user nodes into a second different NNC architecture for distribution of media streams during the teleconference.

19 . The teleconference system according to claim 11 , wherein the media stream flow is dynamically re-configured in response to at least one of a change in a number of participants of the teleconference, a change in an active/inactive status of at least one user node, a change in an end-to-end latency of at least one user node, a change in a quality of at least one of the media streams, and a change in at least one user node's capacity to handle a portion of a media stream load of the teleconference.

20 . The teleconference system according to claim 11 , wherein the central controller further dynamically changes a quality of a media stream associated with one of the user nodes during the teleconference.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 19, 2018
From: CAFEX COMMUNICATIONS INC.; CAFEX COMMUNICATIONS LTD.; CSPACE HOLDING COMPANY
To: CXB 2018 LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045275/0546 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2018
From: CAFEX COMMUNICATIONS INC.; CAFEX COMMUNICATIONS LTD.; CSPACE HOLDING COMPANY
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 045207/0166 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2014
From: WISEMAN, KEVIN J.; GLASS, KEVIN J.; HOLVEY, JOHN; LEWIS, ALEXANDER R.
To: CAFEX COMMUNICATIONS LTD
Reel/Frame 033084/0124 →