IP Library Granted Patent US 9,816,972
Granted Patent B2
US 9,816,972 · App. 14/317,836 · Granted Nov 14, 2017

Process-based approach for the detection of CO2 injectate leakage

Inventors: Katherine Romanak (Austin, TX); Philip C. Bennett (Austin, TX)
Assignee: Board of Regents, The University of Texas System
G01N33/0004G01M3/226G01N33/004G01N33/24G01V9/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,816,972
App. No.
14/317,836
Granted
Nov 14, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention includes a method for distinguishing between a natural source of deep gas and gas leaking from a CO 2 storage reservoir at a near surface formation comprising: obtaining one or more surface or near surface geological samples; measuring a CO 2 , an O 2 , a CH 4 , and an N 2 level from the surface or near surface geological sample; determining the water vapor content at or above the surface or near surface geological samples; normalizing the gas mixture of the CO 2 , the O 2 , the CH 4 , the N 2 and the water vapor content to 100% by volume or 1 atmospheric total pressure; determining: a ratio of CO 2 versus N 2 ; and a ratio of CO 2 to N 2 , wherein if the ratio is greater than that produced by a natural source of deep gas CO 2 or deep gas methane oxidizing to CO 2 , the ratio is indicative of gas leaking from a CO 2 storage reservoir.

Claims (65)

1. A process-based method of detecting a CO 2 gas leak in a deep geologic gas storage reservoir, the method comprising:

constructing a gas sampling station in a vadose zone proximal to the deep geologic gas storage reservoir;

measuring a CO 2 level in the vadose zone using one or more gas analyzers sampling gas from the vadose zone through the gas sampling station;

measuring an O 2 level in the vadose zone using one or more gas analyzers sampling gas from the vadose zone through the gas sampling station;

measuring a CH 4 level in the vadose zone using one or more gas analyzers sampling gas from the vadose zone through the gas sampling station;

measuring a N 2 level in the vadose zone using one or more gas analyzers sampling gas from the vadose zone through the gas sampling station;

determining a H 2 O vapor level in the vadose zone;

determining an Ar level in the vadose zone;

computing a normalized CO 2 level, a normalized O 2 level, a normalized CH 4 level, a normalized N 2 level, a normalized Ar level, and a normalized H 2 O vapor level using the CO 2 level, the O 2 level, the CH 4 level, the N 2 level, the Ar level, and the H 2 O vapor level, wherein a normalized level corresponds to a concentration of a gas referenced to 100% by volume or to 1 atmosphere total pressure;

determining a first relationship representing the normalized O 2 level as a function of the normalized CO 2 level;

generating a comparison of the first relationship with a second relationship representing O 2 levels as a function of CO 2 levels for respiration processes;

determining, using the comparison, that the first relationship is indicative of the normalized CO 2 level for the normalized O 2 level being greater than that expected for respiration, thereby detecting that CO 2 gas is being added to the vadose zone from an exogenous deep source;

generating a second comparison of the first relationship with a third relationship representing O 2 levels as a function of CO 2 levels from CH 4 oxidation processes;

determining, using the second comparison, that the first relationship is indicative of the normalized CO 2 level for the normalized O 2 level being greater than that expected from CH 4 oxidation, thereby confirming that CO 2 gas is being added to the vadose zone from the exogenous deep source; and

indicating that CO 2 gas is leaking from the deep geologic gas storage reservoir.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the first relationship includes generating a plot of the normalized O 2 level versus the normalized CO 2 level.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein generating the comparison includes showing a curve on the plot representing the second relationship.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the first relationship includes generating a plot of the normalized O 2 level versus the normalized CO 2 level, and wherein generating the second comparison includes showing a curve on the plot representing the third relationship.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a third relationship representing the normalized CO 2 level as a function of the normalized N 2 level;

generating a second comparison of the third relationship with a normalized atmospheric N 2 level; and

determining, using the second comparison, that the normalized N 2 level is less than the normalized atmospheric N 2 level, thereby detecting that CO 2 gas is being added to the vadose zone from an exogenous deep source.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein determining the third relationship includes generating a second plot of the normalized CO 2 level versus the normalized N 2 level.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein generating the second comparison includes showing a line on the second plot representing the normalized atmospheric N 2 level.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a normalized N 2 /O 2 level using the normalized N 2 level and the normalized O 2 level;

determining a third relationship of the normalized CO 2 level as a function of the normalized N 2 /O 2 level;

generating a second comparison of the third relationship with a fourth relationship representing CO 2 levels as a function of N 2 /O 2 levels for respiration or methane oxidation; and

determining, using the second comparison, that the third relationship is indicative of the normalized CO 2 level for the normalized N 2 /O 2 level being greater than that expected for respiration or CH 4 oxidation, thereby detecting that CO 2 gas is being added to the vadose zone from an exogenous deep source.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining the third relationship includes generating a second plot of the normalized CO 2 level versus the normalized N 2 /O 2 level.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein generating the second comparison includes showing a curve on the second plot representing the fourth relationship.

11. A process-based method of detecting a natural source of CO 2 gas proximal to a deep geologic gas storage reservoir, the method comprising:

constructing a gas sampling station in a vadose zone proximal to the deep geologic gas storage reservoir;

measuring a CO 2 level in the vadose zone using one or more gas analyzers sampling gas from the vadose zone through the gas sampling station;

measuring an O 2 level in the vadose zone using one or more gas analyzers sampling gas from the vadose zone through the gas sampling station;

measuring a CH 4 level in the vadose zone using one or more gas analyzers sampling gas from the vadose zone through the gas sampling station;

measuring a N 2 level in the vadose zone using one or more gas analyzers sampling gas from the vadose zone through the gas sampling station;

determining a H 2 O vapor level in the vadose zone;

determining an Ar level in the vadose zone;

computing a normalized CO 2 level, a normalized O 2 level, a normalized CH 4 level, a normalized N 2 level, a normalized Ar level, and a normalized H 2 O vapor level using the CO 2 level, the O 2 level, the CH 4 level, the N 2 level, the Ar level, and the H 2 O vapor level, wherein a normalized level corresponds to a concentration of a gas referenced to 100% by volume or to 1 atmosphere total pressure;

determining a first relationship representing the normalized O 2 level as a function of the normalized CO 2 level;

generating a comparison of the first relationship with a second relationship representing O 2 levels as a function of CO 2 levels for respiration processes;

determining, using the comparison, that the first relationship is indicative of the normalized CO 2 level for the normalized O 2 level being smaller or about equal to that expected for respiration, thereby detecting that CO 2 gas is being added to the vadose zone by a natural source;

generating a second comparison of the first relationship with a third relationship representing O 2 levels as a function of CO 2 levels from CH 4 oxidation processes;

determining, using the second comparison, that the first relationship is indicative of the normalized CO 2 level for the normalized O 2 level being smaller than or about equal to that expected from CH 4 oxidation, thereby confirming that CO 2 gas is being added to the vadose zone by the natural source; and

indicating that CO 2 gas present in the vadose zone is from a natural source.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

identifying the natural source as biological respiration.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the first relationship includes generating a plot of the normalized O 2 level versus the normalized CO 2 level.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein generating the comparison includes showing a curve on the plot representing the second relationship.

15. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

identifying the natural source as CO 2 from CH 4 oxidation.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the first relationship includes generating a plot of the normalized O 2 level versus the normalized CO 2 level, and wherein generating the second comparison includes showing a curve on the plot representing the third relationship.

17. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

determining a third relationship representing the normalized CO 2 level as a function of the normalized N 2 level;

generating a second comparison of the third relationship with a normalized atmospheric N 2 level; and

determining, using the second comparison, that the normalized N 2 level is about equal to the normalized atmospheric N 2 level, thereby detecting that CO 2 gas is being added to the vadose zone from a natural source.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein determining the third relationship includes generating a second plot of the normalized CO 2 level versus the normalized N 2 level.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein generating the second comparison includes showing a line on the second plot representing the normalized atmospheric N 2 level.

20. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

determining a normalized N 2 /O 2 level using the normalized N 2 level and the normalized O 2 level;

determining a third relationship of the normalized CO 2 level as a function of the normalized N 2 /O 2 level;

generating a second comparison of the third relationship with a fourth relationship representing CO 2 levels as a function of N 2 /O 2 levels for respiration or methane oxidation; and

determining, using the second comparison, that the third relationship is indicative of the normalized CO 2 level for the normalized N 2 /O 2 level being about equal to or less than that expected for respiration or CH 4 oxidation, thereby detecting that CO 2 gas is being added to the vadose zone from a natural source.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein determining the third relationship includes generating a second plot of the normalized CO 2 level versus the normalized N 2 /O 2 level and wherein generating the second comparison includes showing a curve on the second plot representing the fourth relationship.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Dec 8, 2020
From: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 054645/0444 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 3, 2014
From: ROMANAK, KATHERINE; BENNETT, PHILIP C.
To: BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM
Reel/Frame 033238/0544 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61840234 · Jun 27, 2013
Related Publication 20150000374A1 · Jan 1, 2015