IP Library Granted Patent US 9,940,578
Granted Patent B1
US 9,940,578 · App. 14/328,533 · Granted Apr 10, 2018

Systems and methods for disrupting undesirable outcomes

Inventors: Kourtney Govro (Peculiar, MO); Kristal Rayson (Independence, MO); Steven Kent Mills (Overland Park, KS); Kyle Evans (Faucett, MO); David Govro (Peculiar, MO); Devon Kerns (Savannah, MO)
Assignee: Sphere3, LLC
G06N5/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,940,578
App. No.
14/328,533
Granted
Apr 10, 2018
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems and methods set forth herein may aid in identifying and disrupting undesirable outcomes. The system may include computer readable media; an electronic input device; an output device; a processor in data communication with the input device and the output device; and electronic instructions. The electronic instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, perform steps for: automatically storing event data from the electronic input device in the computer readable media; actuating the output device to graphically display the event data; determining if the event data qualifies as a critical event; storing the critical event data as outcome data in the computer readable media; accessing the event data and outcome data; determining at least one correlation between the event data and the outcome data; actuating the output device to display an intervention to aid in disrupting future critical events; and storing the intervention in the computer readable media.

Claims (41)

1. A system for identifying and disrupting undesirable outcomes in a patient's care, comprising:

a non-transitory computer readable medium; and

at least one processor programmed to perform the steps of:

receiving patient event data provided by a patient event device, wherein the patient event data comprises physiological data generated by the patient event device;

receiving patient action data manually input by at least one clinician associated with the patient's care, wherein the patient action data is information related to an interaction between the at least one clinician and the patient during the patient's care;

analyzing the patient event data and the patient action data and, based on the analysis, identifying a first critical event related to the patient's care;

comparing the patient event data and the patient action data to the first critical event;

identifying, based on the comparison, a causal link from the patient event data and the patient action data that resulted in the first critical event;

determining, based on the identified causal link, a first intervention to aid in disrupting a second critical event;

wherein the first intervention provides at least one instruction to avoid the second critical event;

determining a second intervention, distinct from the first intervention, to aid in disrupting the second critical event, based on the identified causal link; and

determining a superior intervention based on the first intervention, the second intervention, and a determining factor.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the patient event device includes at least one item selected from the group consisting of an interactive bed, a telemetry system, a ventilator system, an IV pump, a thermometer, a nurse call light system, an O2 saturation system, and a RTLS/RFID locating system.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein one of the first intervention, the second intervention, or the superior intervention identifies critical event data leading to the first critical event and provides instructions to avoid the second critical event in the future.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the first critical event is determined based on predetermined criteria for recognizing undesirable outcomes.

5. The system of claim 2 , wherein the action data comprises data not automatically input via the patient event device.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the patient event data and the patient action data include corresponding location data to maintain a record of origin for the event and the action.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein one of the first intervention, the second intervention, or the superior intervention identifies the patient event data and the patient action data leading to the first critical event and provides instructions to avoid the second critical event in the future.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions provide information to prevent future patient falls.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions provide information to alter patient medication.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the determining factor is a cost that is lower than the calculated cost of either the first intervention the second intervention, or the superior intervention.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the determining factor is staff availability.

12. A system for identifying and disrupting undesirable outcomes in a patient's care, comprising:

a non-transitory computer readable medium; and

at least one processor programmed to perform the steps of:

receiving patient event data provided by a patient event device, wherein the patient event data comprises physiological data generated by the patient event device;

receiving patient action data manually input by at least one clinician associated with the patient's care, wherein the patient action data is information related to an interaction between the at least one clinician and the patient during the patient's care;

analyzing the patient event data and the patient action data and, based on the analysis, identifying a first critical event related to the patient's care;

comparing the patient event data and the patient action data to the first critical event and, based on the comparison, identifying a causal link from the patient event data and the patient action data that resulted in the first critical event;

based on the identified causal link, determining a first intervention to aid in disrupting a second critical event;

based on the identified causal link, determining a second intervention, distinct from the first intervention, to aid in disrupting the second critical event; and

determining a superior intervention based on the first intervention, the second intervention, and a determining factor,

wherein the superior intervention is determined by the at least one processor calculating a lower cost for the superior intervention than the cost of either the first intervention or the second intervention.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the determining factor is staff availability.

14. The system of claim 12 ,

wherein the determining factor is a first determining factor,

wherein the step of determining the superior intervention is further based on a second determining factor.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the second determining factor is a cost that is lower than the calculated cost of either the first intervention or the second intervention.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the first intervention identifies critical event data leading to the first critical event and provides instructions to avoid the second critical event in the future.

17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the patient event device includes at least one item selected from the group consisting of an interactive bed, a telemetry system, a ventilator system, an IV pump, a thermometer, a nurse call light system, an O2 saturation system, and a RTLS/RFID locating system.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the first critical event is determined based on predetermined criteria for recognizing undesirable outcomes.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AT REEL/FRAME NO. 55995/0549 Recorded Feb 16, 2022
From: CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE (AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO WF FUND V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
To: INTEGO SOFTWARE, LLC
Reel/Frame 059165/0941 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 21, 2021
From: INTEGO SOFTWARE, LLC
To: CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO WF FUND V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Reel/Frame 055995/0549 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE'S NAME INTEGO SOFTWARE, LLC D/B/A CRITICAL ALERT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 049488 FRAME 0808. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Dec 31, 2020
From: SPHERE3, LLC
To: INTEGO SOFTWARE, LLC D/B/A CRITICAL ALERT
Reel/Frame 054883/0483 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 17, 2019
From: SPHERE3, LLC
To: INTEGRO SOFTWARE, LLC D/B/A CRITICAL ALERT SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 049488/0808 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 17, 2019
From: SPHERE3, LLC
To: INTEGO SOFTWARE, D/B/A CRITICAL ALERT
Reel/Frame 049491/0108 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 14, 2014
From: GOVRO, KOURTNEY; RAYSON, KRISTAL; MILLS, STEVEN KENT; EVANS, KYLE; GOVRO, DAVID; KERNS, DEVON
To: SPHERE3, LLC
Reel/Frame 033538/0442 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 61844718 · Jul 10, 2013