IP Library Granted Patent US 9,863,929
Granted Patent B2
US 9,863,929 · App. 14/383,495 · Granted Jan 9, 2018

Method and device for evaluating a wooden board

Inventors: Anders Olsson (Växjö, SE); Erik Serrano (Lund, SE); Jan Oscarsson (Växjö, SE); Bertil Enquist (Göteborg, SE); Marie Johansson (Växjö, SE); Bo Källsner (Täby, SE)
Assignee: WOODEYE AB
G01N33/46G01N3/02G01N21/8986G01N2201/06113G01N2201/105
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,863,929
App. No.
14/383,495
Granted
Jan 9, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a method and device for evaluating a wooden board with an elongated direction. Data indicating fiber orientation over the surface of the board is acquired and for a number of board sub-portions a nominal local modulus of elasticity, MOE, is determined based on the fiber orientation data and a nominal material parameter. A nominal global MOE in the elongated direction for the wooden board as a whole is generated and compared with a secondary global MOE. Based on the fiber orientation data and this comparison an estimated local modulus of elasticity, MOE, in said elongated direction is generated for a number of board sub-portions. This data may be used e.g. for reliable strength grading of wooden boards.

Claims (38)

1. A method for evaluating a wooden board, the method comprising:

acquiring data indicating fiber orientation for a surface of the wooden board;

for each of a plurality of board sub-portions, determining a respective nominal local modulus of elasticity (MOE) associated with an elongated direction of the wooden board based on the fiber orientation and nominal material parameters E l , E r , E t , G lr , G lt , G rt , v lr , v lt , and v rt , wherein the parameters E l , E r , E t indicate a moduli of elasticity in orthotropic directions of the wooden board, the parameters G lr , G lt , and G rt indicate a shear moduli in respective orthotropic planes of the wooden board, and the parameters v lr , v lt , and v rt are Poisson's ratios;

generating a nominal global MOE associated with the elongated direction of the wooden board based on the determined nominal local MOEs;

determining a secondary global MOE for the wooden board by exciting the wooden board with an impact in a longitudinal direction of the wooden board and measuring a primary resonance frequency of the wooden board;

comparing the nominal global MOE with the secondary global MOE; and

for each of the plurality of board sub-portions, determining a respective estimated local MOE associated with the elongated direction of the wooden board based on the fiber orientation and the comparison of the nominal global MOE with the secondary global MOE.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the data indicating fiber orientation over the surface of the wooden board is acquired using an optical scanner.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein determining the respective nominal local MOE associated with the elongated direction of the wooden board for a given board sub-portion is performed based on an assumption that a volume of wood beneath the surface of the given board sub-portion has the same fiber orientation as the surface of the given board sub-portion.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plurality of respective estimated local MOEs are used to determine a strength grade for the wooden board.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the strength grade is further based on an indicating property (IP).

6. The method according to claim 5 , wherein the IP is based on a calculated bending stiffness in a number of cross sections along a length of the wooden board, and a minimum cross section bending stiffness is used as a basis for the IP.

7. The method according to claim 5 , wherein the IP is based on a calculated axial stiffness in a number of cross sections along a length of the wooden board, and a minimum cross section axial stiffness being used as a basis for the IP.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plurality of respective estimated local MOEs are used to determine a bending or an axial stiffness of the wooden board across a plurality of cross sections of a length of the wooden board.

9. A device comprising:

a scanner configured to acquire data indicating fiber orientation for a surface of a wooden board; and

a processing unit configured to:

determine, for each of a plurality of board sub-portions, a respective nominal local modulus of elasticity (MOE) associated with an elongated direction of the wooden board based on the fiber orientation and nominal material parameters E l , E r , E t , G lr , G lt , G rt , v lr , v lt , and v rt wherein the parameters E t , E r , E t indicate a moduli of elasticity in orthotropic directions of the wooden board, the parameters G lr , G lt , and G rt indicate a shear moduli in respective orthotropic planes of the wooden board, and the parameters v lr , v lt , and v rt are Poisson's ratios, and

generate a nominal global MOE associated with the elongated direction of the wooden board based on the determined nominal local MOEs; and

a resonance frequency sensing unit configured to:

determine a secondary global MOE for the wooden board by exciting the wooden board with an impact in a longitudinal direction of the wooden board, and

measure a primary resonance frequency of the wooden board,

wherein the processing unit is further configured to compare the nominal global MOE with the secondary global MOE, and

wherein the processing unit is further configured to determine, for each of the plurality of board sub-portions, a respective estimated local MOE associated with the elongated direction of the wooden board based on the fiber orientation and the comparison of the nominal global MOE with the secondary global MOE.

10. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the processing unit is further configured to determine a strength grade for the wooden board based on the plurality of respective estimated local MOEs.

11. The device according to claim 10 , wherein the strength grade is further based on an indicating property (IP).

12. The device according to claim 11 , wherein the IP is based on a calculated bending stiffness in a number of cross sections along a length of the wooden board, and a minimum cross section bending stiffness is used as a basis for the IP.

13. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the processing unit is configured to determine the respective nominal local MOE associated with the elongated direction of the wooden board for a given board sub-portion based on an assumption that a volume of wood beneath the surface of the given board sub-portion has the same fiber orientation as the surface of the given board sub-portion.

14. A method comprising:

acquiring data indicating fiber orientation for a surface of a wooden board;

for each of a plurality of board sub-portions, determining a respective estimated nominal local modulus of elasticity (MOE) associated with an elongated direction of the wooden board based on the fiber orientation and nominal material parameters E l , E r , E t , G lr , G lt , G rt , v lr , v lt , and v rt , wherein the parameters E l , E r , E t indicate a moduli of elasticity in orthotropic directions of the wooden board, the parameters G lr , G lt , and G rt indicate a shear moduli in respective orthotropic planes of the wooden board, and the parameters v lr , v lt , and v rt are Poisson's ratios;

generating a nominal global MOE associated with the elongated direction of the wooden board based on the determined nominal local MOEs;

determining a secondary global MOE for the wooden board by exciting the wooden board with an impact in a longitudinal direction of the wooden board and measuring a primary resonance frequency of the wooden board after excitation; and

for each of the plurality of board sub-portions, determining a respective estimated local MOE associated with the elongated direction of the wooden board based on the fiber orientation, the nominal global MOE, and the secondary global MOE.

15. The method according to claim 14 , further comprising:

comparing the nominal global MOE with the secondary global MOE.

16. The method according to claim 15 , wherein determining the respective estimated local MOEs for each of the plurality of board sub-portions is based on the comparison of the nominal global MOE with the secondary global MOE.

17. The method according to claim 14 , wherein determining the respective nominal local MOE associated with the elongated direction of the wooden board for a given board sub-portion is performed based on an assumption that a volume of wood beneath the surface of the given board sub-portion has the same fiber orientation as the surface of the given board sub-portion.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 3, 2022
From: WOODEYE AB
To: MICROTEC AB
Reel/Frame 058949/0049 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 24, 2017
From: OLSSON, ANDERS; SERRANO, ERIK; OSCARSSON, JAN; ENQUIST, BERTIL; JOHANSSON, MARIE; KALLSNER, BO
To: INNOVATIV VISION AB
Reel/Frame 042132/0709 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 24, 2017
From: INNOVATIV VISION AB
To: WOODEYE AB
Reel/Frame 042324/0301 →
Priority Claims (1)
SE 1250214 · Mar 8, 2012 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150057954A1 · Feb 26, 2015