IP Library Granted Patent US 9,376,358
Granted Patent B2
US 9,376,358 · App. 14/404,519 · Granted Jun 28, 2016

System and method for removal of heavy metal ions from a rich hydrate inhibitor stream

Inventor: Kristian Jensen (Asker, NO)
Assignee: FJORDS PROCESSING AS
C07C29/88B01J4/001B01J14/00B04B1/04B04B7/12C09K8/52E21B21/068B01D21/262C09K2208/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,376,358
App. No.
14/404,519
Granted
Jun 28, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Method and system for removal of heavy metal ions from a rich hydrate inhibitor stream, wherein the method comprises a) adding a selective heavy metal reactant to the rich hydrate inhibitor stream, forming a fluid stream comprising heavy metal salt particles, b) separating the obtained fluid stream in three streams a hydrocarbon stream, a recovered rich hydrate inhibitor stream, and a slurry comprising the heavy metal salt particles, c) separating remaining hydrate inhibitor from the slurry thereby obtaining a concentrated rest comprising the heavy metal salt particles.

Claims (14)

1. A method for removal of heavy metal ions from a rich hydrate inhibitor stream, wherein the method comprises:

a) adding a selective heavy metal reactant to the rich hydrate inhibitor stream, forming a fluid stream comprising heavy metal salt particles,

wherein the selective heavy metal reactant is a sulphide;

b) separating the obtained fluid stream into three streams: a hydrocarbon stream, a recovered rich hydrate inhibitor stream, and a slurry comprising the heavy metal salt particles; and

c) separating remaining hydrate inhibitor from the slurry thereby obtaining a concentrated rest comprising the heavy metal salt particles.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the separation in step b) is performed in a disc stack centrifuge.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method comprises regulating the pH of the rich hydrate inhibitor stream to between 6 and 8.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method comprises regulating the temperature of the rich hydrate inhibitor stream to below 50° C.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the heavy metal is selected from the group consisting of mercury, cadmium, lead, chromium, cobalt, arsenic, nickel, manganese, and copper.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method comprises combining the remaining hydrate inhibitor with the recovered rich hydrate inhibitor stream.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises downstream precipitation and removal of divalent cation salts from the recovered rich hydrate inhibitor stream.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the sulphide is Na 2 S.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises adding a flocculent to the rich hydrate inhibitor stream.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the hydrate inhibitor is mono-ethylene glycol (MEG).

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 22, 2022
From: NOV PROCESS & FLOW TECHNOLOGIES AS
To: GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
Reel/Frame 063723/0209 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 31, 2019
From: FJORDS PROCESSING AS
To: NOV PROCESS & FLOW TECHNOLOGIES AS
Reel/Frame 049331/0604 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 28, 2015
From: JENSEN, KRISTIAN M.
To: FJORDS PROCESSING AS
Reel/Frame 034828/0082 →
Priority Claims (1)
NO 20120634 · May 30, 2012 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150112102A1 · Apr 23, 2015