IP Library Granted Patent US 9,546,968
Granted Patent B2
US 9,546,968 · App. 14/414,679 · Granted Jan 17, 2017

Meat assessment device

Inventor: Cameron Cooke (Sydney, AU)
Assignee: EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
G01N23/046G01N33/12G06T7/0002G06T7/0004G06T7/404G06T11/60G06T15/00G06T2207/10081G06T2207/10116G06T2207/20021G06T2207/30128G06T2211/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,546,968
App. No.
14/414,679
Granted
Jan 17, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for assessing the quality of a piece of meat may be described. The method may include creating a plurality of cross-sectional images through a piece of meat. The method may additionally include performing image analysis on at least one of the images to determine the arrangement of fat and lean meat within the piece of meat. The arrangement may be indicative of the quality of the piece of meat.

Claims (41)

1. A method to assess a quality of a piece of meat, the method comprising:

creating a cross-sectional image through the piece of meat;

receiving a selected area of the cross-sectional image:

performing a texture analysis on the selected area of the cross-sectional image to determine a texture of the selected area, wherein the texture of the selected area includes a variation in a coloring associated with the cross-sectional image and a variation in an intensity associated with the cross-sectional image: and

performing an image analysis on the selected area of the cross-sectional image to determine an arrangement of fat meat and lean meat within the piece of meat, wherein the arrangement of fat meat and lean meat within the piece of meat is indicative of the quality of the piece of meat.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

creating additional sequential cross-sectional images through the piece of meat, wherein the additional sequential cross-sectional images are tomographic images created using an x-ray computer tomography scanner: and

combining the cross-sectional image and the additional sequential cross-sectional images to produce a three-dimensional representation of the piece of meat.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

determining a cutting pattern for the piece of meat in dependence on the arrangement of fat meat and lean meat within the piece of meat.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the texture analysis is performed using a Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix (GLCM) algorithm.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the piece of meat is at least a section of an animal body.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the piece of meat is at least a section of an animal carcass.

7. A method to value a piece of meat, the method comprising:

creating a cross-sectional image through the piece of meat;

receiving a selected area of the cross-sectional image;

performing a texture analysis on the selected area of the cross-sectional image to determine a texture of the selected area, wherein the texture of the selected area includes a variation in a coloring associated with the cross-sectional image and a variation in an intensity associated with the cross-sectional image: and

performing an image analysis on the selected area of the cross-sectional image to determine an arrangement of fat meat and lean meat within the piece of meat, wherein the arrangement of fat meat and lean meat within the piece of meat is indicative of a quality of the piece of meat.

8. A meat quality assessment apparatus, the meat quality assessment apparatus comprising:

a scanner adapted to:

produce a cross-sectional image through a piece of meat;

select an area of the cross-sectional image;

perform a texture analysis on the selected area of the cross-sectional image to determine a texture of the selected area, wherein the texture of the selected area includes a variation in a coloring associated with the cross-sectional image and a variation in an intensity associated with the cross-sectional image; and

a processor adapted to:

perform an image analysis on the selected area of the cross-sectional image to determine an arrangement of fat meat and lean meat within the piece of meat, wherein the arrangement of fat meat and lean meat within the piece of meat is indicative of the quality of the piece of meat.

9. The meat quality assessment apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the scanner is further configured to:

produce additional sequential cross-sectional images through the piece of meat wherein the additional sequential cross-sectional images are tomographic images created using an x-ray computer tomography scanner.

10. The meat quality assessment apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

combine the additional sequential cross-sectional images and the cross-sectional image to produce a three-dimensional representation of the piece of meat.

11. The meat quality assessment apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine a cutting pattern for the piece of meat in dependence on an arrangement of fat meat and lean meat within the piece of meat.

12. The meat quality assessment apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the meat quality assessment apparatus further comprises:

a selection means configured to: select another area of the cross-sectional image for analysis; and

wherein the processor is further configured to:

perform another texture analysis on the other selected area, wherein the other texture analysis is performed using a Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix (GLCM) algorithm.

13. The meat quality assessment apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the piece of meat is at least a section of an animal body.

14. The meat quality assessment apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the piece of meat is at least a section of an animal carcass.

15. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

determining at least one of a GLCM correlation value and a GLCM dissimilarity value from the GLCM algorithm, wherein the at least one of the GLCM correlation value and the GLCM dissimilarity value is indicative of a degree of marbling.

16. The meat quality assessment apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine at least one of a GLCM correlation value and a GLCM dissimilarity value from the GLCM algorithm, wherein the at least one of the Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix (GLCM) correlation value and the Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix (GLCM) dissimilarity value is indicative of a degree of marbling.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 18, 2017
From: EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
To: INVENTION DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 043611/0854 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 13, 2015
From: COOKE, CAMERON
To: EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
Reel/Frame 034759/0454 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150317803A1 · Nov 5, 2015