IP Library Granted Patent US 10,354,755
Granted Patent B2
US 10,354,755 · App. 14/482,997 · Granted Jul 16, 2019

Systems and methods for evaluating experience of a health care provider

Inventors: David Lee Norris (Malibu, CA); Susanne Beth Goldstein (Boston, MA); Jay W. Calvert (Newport Beach, CA); Brian Patrick Conroy (Decatur, GA); Kingshuk Chatterjee (Los Angeles, CA)
Assignee: MD Insider, Inc.
G16H40/20G06F16/24575G06F19/324G06Q10/06393G06Q30/0627G06Q50/22G16H10/60G16H80/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,354,755
App. No.
14/482,997
Granted
Jul 16, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

In one embodiment, a method comprises identifying one or more health-care-providers associated with one or more medical-specializations, wherein each medical-specialization is associated with a specialty class and at least one geographic area. A number of patient-diagnosis codes is received, each patient-diagnosis code corresponding to one of the health-care-providers and representing a patient-visit to the health-care-provider. The patient-diagnosis code includes at least one diagnosis within a condition-group for the patient visit, and a severity-factor for the diagnosis. The method further comprises determining all patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the health-care-providers. A patient-volume is calculated for each health-care-provider, based on the patient-diagnosis codes and associated severity-factors. A variety-score is calculated for each health-care-provider based on the patient-diagnosis codes. An experience-score is calculated for each health-care-provider based on the patient-volume and variety-score.

Claims (55)

1. A method comprising:

identifying, by one or more computing devices of an experience-engine system, one or more health-care-providers associated with one or more medical-specializations, each medical-specialization associated with a specialty class and at least one geographic area;

receiving, by one or more computing devices, a plurality of patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the one or more health-care-providers, wherein each patient-diagnosis code represents a patient visit to the health-care-provider and comprises:

at least one diagnosis given for the patient visit, the diagnosis being associated with a condition-group; and

a severity-factor associated with the diagnosis;

determining, by one or more computing devices, all patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the one or more health-care-providers;

for a particular health-care-provider from the one or more health-care-providers, calculating, by one or more computing devices, a patient-volume for each condition-group, wherein the patient-volume is calculated based on a relative number of cases within a particular condition-group for the particular health-care-provider compared to the total number of cases within the particular condition-group for all health-care-providers in the medical-specialization, the patient-volume being based on a number of the patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the health-care-provider, wherein the number of the patient-diagnosis codes is further weighted by the severity-factor for each patient-diagnosis code corresponding to the health-care provider;

for each health-care-provider, calculating, by one or more computing devices, a variety-score based at least in part on the patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the health-care- provider;

for each health-care-provider, calculating, by one or more computing devices, an experience-score based on the patient-volume and variety-score; and

sending, by one or more computing devices, the one or more experience-scores for the one or more health-care-providers to a matching engine system, wherein the one or more experience-scores are used with a physician performance-score to determine whether a reference to a health-care-provider of the one or more health-care-providers should be sent to a client computing device of a user in response to a request for information about health-care-providers.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the geographic area comprises a state.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the geographic area comprises a metropolitan statistical area.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient-diagnosis code comprises an administrative claim submitted by the health-care provider.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the diagnosis comprises at least one International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the severity-factor is dependent on whether a particular patient-diagnosis code is chronic or non-chronic.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein a patient-volume for the medical-specialization is calculated based on one or more patient-volumes corresponding to one or more condition-groups within the medical-specialization.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein a patient-volume for the medical-specialization comprises a weighted average of the one or more patient-volumes.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the relative number of cases is weighted by the time elapsed since each patient-visit corresponding to each patient-diagnosis code.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the relative number of cases is weighted by the severity-factor corresponding to each patient-diagnosis code.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein a patient-diagnosis code corresponding to a chronic diagnosis is weighted more than a patient-diagnosis code corresponding to a non-chronic diagnosis.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating a variety-score comprises:

selecting a condition-group within the medical-specialization;

determining a number of distinct patient-diagnosis code-types within the condition-group;

determining a number of patient-diagnosis code-types corresponding to each health-care provider;

determining a number of patient-diagnosis code-types corresponding to a plurality of health-care providers within the medical-specialization; and

dividing the number of patient-diagnosis code-types for each health-care provider by the number of patient-diagnosis code-types for the plurality of health-care providers.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating a variety-score comprises:

determining a number of distinct condition-groups within the medical-specialization;

determining a number of condition-groups corresponding to each health-care provider;

determining a number of condition-groups corresponding to a plurality of health-care providers within the medical-specialization; and

dividing the number of condition-groups for each health-care provider by the number of condition-groups for the plurality of health-care providers.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the experience-score comprises a product of the patient-volume and the variety-score.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the experience-score comprises a weighted sum or weighted average of the patient-volume and the variety-score.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein a health-care provider associated with two or more specializations is also associated with distinct experience-scores for each of the specializations.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein a health-care provider is determined to be unqualified for a particular condition-group if a corresponding experience-score is below a threshold experience-score.

18. One or more non-transitory, computer-readable storage media embodying software that is operable when executed to:

identify one or more health-care-providers associated with one or more medical-specializations, each medical-specialization associated with a specialty class and at least one geographic area;

receive a plurality of patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the one or more health-care-providers, wherein each patient-diagnosis code represents a patient visit to the health-care-provider and comprises:

at least one diagnosis given for the patient visit, the diagnosis being associated with a condition-group; and

a severity-factor associated with the diagnosis;

determine all patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the one or more health-care-providers;

for a particular health-care-provider from the one or more health-care-providers, calculate a patient-volume for each condition-group, wherein the patient-volume is calculated based on a relative number of cases within a particular condition-group for the particular health-care-provider compared to the total number of cases within the particular condition-group for all health-care-providers in the medical-specialization, the patient-volume being based on a number of the patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the health-care-provider, wherein the number of the patient-diagnosis codes is further weighted by the severity-factor for each patient-diagnosis code corresponding to the health-care provider;

for each health-care-provider, calculate a variety-score based at least in part on the patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the health-care-provider;

for each health-care-provider, calculate an experience-score based on the patient-volume and variety-score; and

send the one or more experience-scores for the one or more health-care-providers to a matching engine system, wherein the one or more experience-scores are used with a physician performance-score to determine whether a reference to a health-care-provider of the one or more health-care-providers should be sent to a client computing device of a user in response to a request for information about health-care-providers.

19. A system comprising: one or more processors; and a memory coupled to the processors comprising instructions executable by the processors, the processors being operable when executing the instructions to:

identify one or more health-care-providers associated with one or more medical-specializations, each medical-specialization associated with a specialty class and at least one geographic area;

receive a plurality of patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the one or more health-care-providers, wherein each patient-diagnosis code represents a patient visit to the health-care-provider and comprises:

at least one diagnosis given for the patient visit, the diagnosis being associated with a condition-group; and

a severity-factor associated with the diagnosis;

determine all patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the one or more health-care-providers;

for a particular health-care-provider from the one or more health-care-providers, calculate a patient-volume for each condition-group, wherein the patient-volume is calculated based on a relative number of cases within a particular condition-group for the particular health-care-provider compared to the total number of cases within the particular condition-group for all health-care-providers in the medical-specialization, the patient-volume being based on a number of the patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the health-care-provider, wherein the number of the patient-diagnosis codes is further weighted by the severity-factor for each patient-diagnosis code corresponding to the health-care provider;

for each health-care-provider, calculate a variety-score based at least in part on the patient-diagnosis codes corresponding to the health-care-provider;

for each health-care-provider, calculate an experience-score based on the patient-volume and variety-score; and

send the one or more experience-scores for the one or more health-care-providers to a matching engine system, wherein the one or more experience-scores are used with a physician performance-score to determine whether a reference to a health-care-provider of the one or more health-care-providers should be sent to a client computing device of a user in response to a request for information about health-care-providers.

Assignments (7)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 30, 2025
From: ACCOLADE 2NDMD LLC; ACCOLADE, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 070990/0806 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2025
From: COMERICA BANK, AS AGENT
To: MD INSIDER, INC.
Reel/Frame 070812/0444 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 24, 2020
From: ESCALATE CAPITAL PARTNERS SBIC III, LP
To: MD INSIDER, INC.
Reel/Frame 053307/0048 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2020
From: MD INSIDER, INC.
To: ACCOLADE, INC.
Reel/Frame 053142/0629 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2020
From: MD INSIDER, INC.
To: ESCALATE CAPITAL PARTNERS SBIC III, LP
Reel/Frame 052835/0100 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 18, 2019
From: MD INSIDER, INC.
To: COMERICA BANK, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 050417/0148 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2015
From: NORRIS, DAVID LEE; GOLDSTEIN, SUSANNE BETH; CALVERT, JAY W.; CONROY, BRIAN PATRICK; CHATTERJEE, KINGSHUK
To: MD INSIDER, INC.
Reel/Frame 035398/0693 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61876105 · Sep 10, 2013
Related Publication 20150073833A1 · Mar 12, 2015
Cited By (1)
US 12,711,008