IP Library Granted Patent US 10,805,251
Granted Patent B2
US 10,805,251 · App. 14/527,762 · Granted Oct 13, 2020

Method and system for filtering electronic communications

Inventor: Asher Snyder (Brooklyn, NY)
Assignee: Mesh Labs Inc.
H04L51/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,805,251
App. No.
14/527,762
Granted
Oct 13, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention discloses a method and system for filtering electronic communications based on the receiver's tolerance for attributes of both a sender and an electronic communication. The receiver's tolerance for an attribute is calculated based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to: self-reported preferences, past behavior and community norms. The attribute score is calculated based on an analysis of how closely either the sender or electronic communication exemplifies the attribute. An electronic communication is filtered if the attribute score exceeds the receiver's tolerance of the attribute. If an electronic communication is filtered it will not show up in the receiver's in-box, it will instead show up in a spam folder.

Claims (34)

1. A spam filtering method comprising:

analyzing compatibility of a sender and a receiver of an electronic communication, the analyzing comprising

calculating a compatibility score based on a compatibility of the sender and the receiver, the compatibility score comprising a numerical value, wherein a lower numerical value is indicative of less compatibility and a higher numerical value is indicative of greater compatibility and wherein a higher numerical value is indicative of a diminished chance of the receiver considering the electronic communication spam; and

determining whether to filter the electronic communication based, at least in part, on the compatibility score;

wherein analyzing the compatibility of the sender and the receiver further comprises:

requesting the receiver provide a response to a plurality of challenge questions, wherein the receiver can select the plurality of challenge questions; and

requesting a sender provide a response to the plurality of challenge questions, wherein the plurality of challenge questions are the same plurality of challenge questions selected and responded to by the receiver;

determining whether the response provided by the sender matches the response provided by the receiver;

wherein calculating the compatibility score comprises calculating the compatibility score to be zero if the response provided by the sender does not match the response provided by the receiver;

receiving an indication of one or more deal-breaker questions from the receiver to be sent to the sender and a preferred answer to the one or more deal-breaker questions;

receiving an answer to the one or more deal-breaker questions from the sender;

determining whether the answer from the sender to the one or more deal-breaker questions matches one or more preferred answers to the one or more deal-breaker questions selected by the receiver; and

preventing the sender from sending electronic communications to the receiver unless the answer from the sender to the one or more deal-breaker questions matches the one or more preferred answers to the one or more deal-breaker questions selected by the receivers;

allowing the receiver to receive communications from the sender if the answer from the sender to the one or more deal-breaker questions matches the one or more preferred answers to the one or more deal-breaker questions selected by the receiver and the compatibility score is below a tolerance threshold;

wherein determining whether to filter the electronic communication comprises filtering the electronic communication if the compatibility score is calculated to be zero;

wherein in analyzing the compatibility of the sender and the receiver comprises:

calculating the tolerance threshold, wherein calculating the receiver's tolerance threshold comprises:

setting a baseline tolerance threshold, wherein the baseline tolerance threshold is based, at least in part on a survey of a plurality receivers requesting information about an attribute, an attribute comprising one or more personal habits of the sender; and

adjusting the baseline tolerance based, at least in part on analyzing:

the receiver's past history, wherein the past history comprises:

 zero or more electronic communications sent by the receiver;

 zero or more electronic communications responded to by the receiver; and

 the receiver's responses to the survey; and

calculating an attribute score;

wherein the tolerance threshold is a numerical value representing the receiver's tolerance of an attribute;

wherein a lower value is indicative of a lower tolerance of the attribute and a higher value is indicative of a greater the tolerance of the attribute;

wherein the attribute score is a numerical value representing how much the attribute is exemplified;

wherein the attribute score is calculated, at least in part, by analyzing:

the sender's response to a survey requesting information on the attributes;

the electronic communication sent by the sender; and

zero or more other electronic communications sent by the sender;

wherein the challenge question is a multiple-choice question;

wherein both the receiver and the sender are requested to provide exactly one response to the challenge question; and

wherein calculating the compatibility score comprises setting the compatibility score zero if the attribute score is greater than the tolerance threshold.

Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 61897422 · Oct 30, 2013
Provisional Application 61898746 · Nov 1, 2013
Related Publication 20150120848A1 · Apr 30, 2015