IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,216,409
Granted Patent B2
US 9,216,409 · App. 14/530,387 · Granted Dec 22, 2015

Systems and methods for zero-PGM binary catalyst having Cu, Mn, and Fe for TWC applications

Inventors: Zahra Nazarpoor (Camarillo, CA); Stephen J. Golden (Santa Barbara, CA)
Assignee: Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.
B01J23/8892B01D53/945B01J23/005B01J23/745B01D2255/2066B01D2255/20715B01D2255/20738B01D2255/20761B01D2255/405B01D2255/65Y02T10/22Y10S502/52712
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,216,409
App. No.
14/530,387
Granted
Dec 22, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

Variations of bulk powder catalyst material including Cu—Mn, Cu—Fe, and Fe—Mn spinel systems for ZPGM TWC applications are disclosed. The disclosed bulk powder catalyst samples include stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric Cu—Mn, Cu—Fe, and Fe—Mn spinels on Pr 6 O 11 —ZrO 2 support oxide, prepared using incipient wetness method. Activity measurements under isothermal steady state sweep test condition may be performed under rich to lean condition. Catalytic activity of samples may be compared to analyze the influence that different binary spinel system bulk powders may have on TWC performance of ZPGM materials for a plurality of TWC applications. Stoichiometric Cu—Mn, Cu—Fe, and Fe—Mn spinel systems exhibit higher catalytic activity than non-stoichiometric Cu—Mn, Cu—Fe, and Fe—Mn spinel systems. The influence of prepared Cu—Mn, Cu—Fe, and Fe—Mn spinel systems may lead into cost effective manufacturing solutions for ZPGM TWC systems.

Claims (22)

1. A catalytic system, comprising:

a substrate;

a washcoat applied to said substrate; and

an overcoat applied to said washcoat comprising at least one support oxide and at least two catalysts applied to the at least one support oxide;

wherein the at least two catalysts have the general formula A X B 3-X O 4 , wherein X may be less than or equal to 1.5 and wherein A and B are selected from the group consisting of Cu, Mn, and Fe; and

wherein the at least two catalysts are substantially free of platinum group metals.

2. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the at least two catalysts are in spinel form.

3. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the at least two catalysts are stoichiometric.

4. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the at least two catalysts are non-stoichiometric.

5. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one support oxide comprises doped Zirconia.

6. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one support oxide comprises Pr 6 O 11 —ZrO 2 .

7. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein one of the at least two catalysts has the general formula Cu X Mn 3-X O 4 where 1.0≦X≦1.5, and wherein one of the at least two catalysts has the general formula Cu X Fe 3-X O 4 where 0.5≦X≦1.0.

8. The catalytic system of claim 7 , further comprising a third catalyst having the general formula Fe X Mn 3-X O 4 wherein 0≦X≦1.5.

9. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein each of the at least two catalysts is stoichiometric or non-stoichiometric.

10. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein the conversion of NO X is higher for stoichiometric spinel than for non-stoichiometric spinel.

11. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein the conversion of NO X is higher for stoichiometric spinel having a formula of Cu 1.0 Mn 2.0 O 4 than for non-stoichiometric spinel having a formula of Cu 1.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 .

12. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein the conversion of HC is higher for stoichiometric spinel having a formula of Cu 1.0 Fe 2.0 O 4 than for non-stoichiometric spinel having a formula of Cu 1.5 Fe 1.5 O 4 .

13. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein the conversion of HC is higher for stoichiometric spinel having a formula of Cu 1.0 Fe 2.0 O 4 than for non-stoichiometric spinel having a formula of Cu 0.5 Fe 2.5 O 4 .

14. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein the conversion of HC is higher for stoichiometric spinel having a formula of Fe 1.0 Mn 2.0 O 4 than for non-stoichiometric spinel having a formula selected from the group consisting of Fe 0.6 Mn 2.4 O 4 , Fe 1.2 Mn 1.8 O 4 , Mn 3 O 4 , and mixtures thereof.

15. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein an increase in the amount of Fe provides for an increase in the conversion of NO X .

16. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the at least two catalysts is Fe—Mn spinel and wherein the at least two catalysts provide for oxidation activity.

17. The catalytic system of claim 1 , wherein the substrate comprises ceramics.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 23, 2015
From: CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (CDTI)
To: CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 036933/0646 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 24, 2014
From: NAZARPOOR, ZAHRA; GOLDEN, STEPHEN J.
To: CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (CDTI)
Reel/Frame 034581/0960 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 13849169 · Mar 22, 2013
Related Publication 20150105243A1 · Apr 16, 2015