IP Library Granted Patent US 9,335,760
Granted Patent B2
US 9,335,760 · App. 14/541,560 · Granted May 10, 2016

Template framework for automated process routing

Inventors: Michael L. Philpott (Seymour, IL); Jeremy D. Rishel (Boston, MA); Elisha Gallaudet (Arlington, MA); Emmanuel Gerlovin (Wayland, MA)
Assignee: aPriori Technologies, Inc.
G05B19/41865G06Q10/04G05B2219/32304
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,335,760
App. No.
14/541,560
Granted
May 10, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and corresponding system is provided for determining an optimum manufacturing process routing. The method comprises electronically constructing a plurality of manufacturing process routings for a component to be manufactured. The electronically constructing for each manufacturing process routing of the plurality of manufacturing process routings comprises defining a recursive process routing tree for each manufacturing process routing, the recursive process routing tree comprising a plurality of nodes, each node of the plurality of nodes corresponding to a manufacturing process and comprising a branch node when the manufacturing process for a given node may be decomposed into a plurality of sub-processes for the given node. The method further comprises electronically determining an optimum process routing by evaluating each recursive process routing tree with reference to a cost for manufacturing the component to be optimized and determining the optimum process routing that minimizes the cost for manufacturing the component.

Claims (16)

1. A method for determining an optimum manufacturing process routing, the method comprising:

electronically representing a plurality of manufacturing process routings for a component to be manufactured, the electronically representing comprising representing at least a component template for the component and a geometric cost driver template for at least one geometric cost driver of the component, the electronically representing being performed using at least one computer processor programmed to electronically represent the plurality of manufacturing process routings; and

electronically determining an optimum process routing of the plurality of manufacturing process routings by applying a cost model to the component template and to the geometric cost driver template for the at least one geometric cost driver, the applying the cost model being based on component inputs including a geometric model of the component, and determining the optimum process routing that minimizes the cost for manufacturing the component, the electronically determining being performed using the at least one computer processor, the at least one computer processor being further programmed to electronically determine the optimum process routing.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the component inputs further include non-geometric manufacturing inputs that affect the cost of manufacturing the component.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the non-geometric manufacturing inputs comprise at least one of production volume, years of production, location of manufacturing of the component, and materials.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one geometric cost driver is selected from the group consisting of number of holes, number of edges and type of bend.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one geometric cost driver is selected from the group consisting of perimeter, volume, and surface area.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the geometric model is a computer-aided design.

7. A system for determining an optimum manufacturing process routing, the system comprising at least one computer processor, the at least one computer processor including:

a routing generation system programmed to electronically represent a plurality of manufacturing process routings for a component to be manufactured, the electronically representing comprising representing at least a component template for the component and a geometric cost driver template for at least one geometric cost driver of the component; and

a routing evaluation system programmed to electronically determine an optimum process routing of the plurality of manufacturing process routings by applying a cost model to the component template and to the geometric cost driver template for the at least one geometric cost driver, the applying the cost model being based on component inputs including a geometric model of the component, and determining the optimum process routing that minimizes the cost for manufacturing the component.

8. The system according to claim 7 , wherein the component inputs further include non-geometric manufacturing inputs that affect the cost of manufacturing the component.

9. The system according to claim 8 , wherein the non-geometric manufacturing inputs comprise at least one of production volume, years of production, location of manufacturing of the component, and materials.

10. The system according to claim 7 , wherein the at least one geometric cost driver is selected from the group consisting of number of holes, number of edges and type of bend.

11. The system according to claim 7 , wherein the at least one geometric cost driver is selected from the group consisting of perimeter, volume, and surface area.

12. The system according to claim 7 , wherein the geometric model is a computer-aided design.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2020
From: APRIORI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK
Reel/Frame 052722/0585 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 26, 2015
From: PHILPOTT, MICHAEL L.; RISHEL, JEREMY D.; GALLAUDET, ELISHA; GERLOVIN, EMMANUEL
To: APRIORI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 035037/0265 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 12893247 · Sep 29, 2010
Provisional Application 61248110 · Oct 2, 2009
Related Publication 20150198946A1 · Jul 16, 2015