IP Library Granted Patent US 10,706,734
Granted Patent B2
US 10,706,734 · App. 14/562,167 · Granted Jul 7, 2020

Methods for improving test efficiency and accuracy in a computer adaptive test (CAT)

Inventors: Lisa Gawlick (Iowa City, IA); Changhui Zhang (Coralville, IA); Nancy Petersen (Solon, IA); Lingyun Gao (Coralville, IA)
Assignee: ACT, INC.
G09B7/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,706,734
App. No.
14/562,167
Granted
Jul 7, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for use of pretest items in a test to calculate interim scores is provided. The method includes, for example, a computer implemented test having a plurality of test items that include, for example, a plurality of operational items and one or more pretest items having one or more pretest item parameters. An interim latent construct estimate is calculated using both operational and pretest items. The error for the latent construct estimation is controlled by weighting the contribution of the one or more pretest items.

Claims (57)

1. A method for using pretest items in a computer adaptive testing platform to calculate interim scores while administering a computer implemented test through a graphical user interface, the method comprising:

determining a first computer implemented test from a test script administration component, the computer implemented test having a first plurality of test items including:

an operational item; and

a pretest item having one or more pretest items parameters, wherein the one or more pretest item parameters include statistical pretest item response data acquired from other examinees;

calculating, with a latent construct estimator, a first interim score based on the response data acquired from other examinees to the operational item and the pretest item;

determining a second computer implemented test having a second plurality of test items, wherein the second computer implemented test comprises a second pretest item and a second operational item, and

wherein the second operational item is chosen based on the first interim score;

displaying, on the graphical user interface, the second computer implemented test;

obtaining, from the graphical user interface, second responses to the second operational item and the second pretest item;

calculating, with the latent construct estimator, a second interim score based on the second responses to the operational item, wherein the calculation of the second interim score includes applying a weight to one or more contributions of the one or more pretest items, and wherein the second interim score is calculated by:

{circumflex over (θ)} i,j *=(1−ω)*{circumflex over (θ)} i,j +ω*{circumflex over (θ)} i,j ′,(0<ω<1),

where w is the weight applied to the second pretest item, j is a test item administered to the current examinee i with true ability {circumflex over (θ)} i , {circumflex over (θ)} i,j is an unweighted interim score using operational items only, and {circumflex over (θ)}′ i,j is an unweighted interim score using both the operational and pretest items administered so far;

and

refining the test script administration component to select a particular test item based on the second interim score.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

estimating the one or more pretest item parameters for use with a set of calibrated parameters for the operational item.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more pretest item parameters are:

equal to the one or more pretest item parameters true value(s); and

not updated during administration of the computer implemented test.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

setting the one or more pretest item parameters to an average of a set of calibrated parameters for the operational item.

5. The method of claim 4 further comprising:

updating the one or more pretest item parameters based on corresponding pretest item responses from a threshold number of additional examinees.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more pretest item parameters comprise maximum likelihood estimators based on the second responses.

7. A method for use of pretest items in a test to calculate interim scores comprising:

providing a computer implemented test, generated with a computer adaptive testing component, having a plurality of test items including:

an operational item; and

a pretest item having one or more pretest item parameters, wherein the one or more pretest item parameters include statistical pretest item response data acquired from other examinees;

calculating, with a latent construct estimator, a first interim score based on the response data acquired from other examinees to the operational item and the pretest item;

determining a second computer implemented test having a second plurality of test items, wherein the second computer implemented test comprises a second pretest item and a second operational item, and

wherein the second operational item is chosen based on the first interim score;

displaying, on a graphical user interface, the second computer implemented test;

obtaining, from the graphical user interface, second responses to the operational items and the second pretest item;

calculating, with the latent construct estimator, a second interim score based on the second responses to the operational item, wherein the calculation of the second interim score includes applying a weight to one or more contributions of the one or more pretest items, and wherein the second interim score is calculated by:

{circumflex over (θ)} i,j *=(1−ω)*{circumflex over (θ)} i,j +ω*{circumflex over (θ)} i,j ′,(0<ω<1),

where w is the weight applied to the second pretest item, j is a test item administered to the current examinee i with true ability {circumflex over (θ)} i , {circumflex over (θ)} i,j is an unweighted interim score using operational items only, and {circumflex over (θ)}′ i,j is an unweighted interim score using both the operational and pretest items administered so far;

determining a particular test item based on the second interim score; and

obtaining, from the graphical user interface, an examinee response to the particular test item.

8. The method of claim 7 further comprising:

randomly selecting and administering the pretest item.

9. The method of claim 7 further comprising:

updating the second interim score for the computer implemented test based on the second responses to the second pretest item.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pretest item parameters are not updated during administration of the computer implemented test.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pretest item parameters are initially equal to an average of operational item parameters.

12. A computer adaptive testing (CAT) platform to calculate interim scores while administering a computer implemented test through a graphical user interface, the CAT platform comprising a computer configured to:

determine a first computer implemented test from a test script administration component, the computer implemented test having a first plurality of test items including:

an operational item; and

a pretest item having one or more pretest items parameters, wherein the pretest item parameters include statistical pretest item response data acquired from other examinees;

calculate, with a latent construct estimator of the computer, a first interim score based on the response data acquired from other examinees to the operational item and the pretest item;

determine a second computer implemented test having a second plurality of test items, wherein the second computer implemented test comprises a second pretest item and a second operational item, and

wherein the second operational item is chosen based on the first interim score;

display, on the graphical user interface, the second computer implemented test;

obtain, from the graphical user interface, second responses to the second operational item and the second pretest item;

calculate, with the latent construct estimator of the computer, a second interim score based on the second responses to the operational item, wherein the calculation of the second interim score includes applying a weight to one or more contributions of the one or more pretest items, and wherein the second interim score is calculated by:

{circumflex over (θ)} i,j *=(1−ω)*{circumflex over (θ)} i,j +ω*{circumflex over (θ)} i,j ′,(0<ω<1),

where w is the weight applied to the second pretest item, j is a test item administered to the current examinee i with true ability {circumflex over (θ)} i , {circumflex over (θ)} i,j is an unweighted interim score using operational items only, and {circumflex over (θ)}′ i,j is an unweighted interim score using both the operational and pretest items administered so far; and

refine the test script administration component to select a particular test item based on the second interim score.

Assignments (5)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 14, 2024
From: ACT EDUCATION CORP.
To: TRUIST BANK
Reel/Frame 067732/0278 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 13, 2024
From: ACT EDUCATION CORP.
To: TRUIST BANK
Reel/Frame 067713/0790 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 11, 2024
From: IMPACT ASSET CORP.
To: ACT EDUCATION CORP.
Reel/Frame 067683/0808 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 8, 2024
From: ACT, INC.
To: IMPACT ASSET CORP.
Reel/Frame 067352/0636 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 21, 2015
From: GAWLICK, LISA; ZHANG, CHANGHUI; PETERSEN, NANCY; GAO, LINGYUN
To: ACT, INC.
Reel/Frame 034768/0656 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61912774 · Dec 6, 2013
Related Publication 20150161899A1 · Jun 11, 2015