IP Library Granted Patent US 10,377,981
Granted Patent B2
US 10,377,981 · App. 14/660,698 · Granted Aug 13, 2019

Software tuning of recipes for beer brewing system

Inventor: William H. Mitchell (Medina, WA)
Assignee: PicoBrew, Inc.
C12C13/00C12C7/06C12C7/205C12C11/003G05B13/041G05B15/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,377,981
App. No.
14/660,698
Granted
Aug 13, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

A beer making system may modify a beer ingredient/process recipe to adjust sensory characteristics of a desired beer. With a given ingredient list and starting recipe, a performance model of a brewing system may be used to generate an updated recipe when given a set of desired sensory characteristics of a desired beer. A user interface may permit a user to adjust characteristics such as thin/thick mouthfeel, dryness/maltiness, hops bitterness, hops flavor, hops aroma, and other characteristics. An updated recipe may change mashing schedules, boiling schedules, or other programmatically controlled aspects of a brewing system. The performance model may include heuristics as well as performance metrics derived from observing previous brewing sessions on one or multiple devices.

Claims (24)

1. A system comprising:

a hardware platform comprising a computer processor, said hardware platform being connected to a storage mechanism; a control system executing on said hardware platform configured to:

receive a performance model of a computer controlled beer brewing system, said performance model comprising a flavor prediction model based on mashing schedules; determine a first recipe, said first recipe having a first set of ingredients and a first mashing schedule;

calculate a first set of flavor characteristics for said first recipe using said performance model, said first set of flavor characteristics being based on a first mashing schedule, said first mashing schedule comprising a first temperature versus time curve for mashing grains;

receive a first user input to adjust a first flavor characteristic; calculate a change to said first mashing schedule to a second mashing schedule and determining a second set of flavor characteristics for said second mashing schedule, said change being calculated using said performance model and said change being made to achieve said first flavor characteristic; store said second mashing schedule as a second recipe for said computer controlled beer brewing system;

transmit said second mashing schedule in a machine readable format to said computer controlled beer brewing system such that said computer controlled beer brewing system can execute said second mashing schedule, and

wherein said first flavor characteristic being mouthfeel,

wherein said first mashing schedule comprising a first hold time at a first mash temperature and a second hold time at a second mash temperature, said first mash temperature being higher than said second mash temperature, when said first user input indicates decreasing mouthfeel, said second mashing schedule being adjusted by increasing mash time at said second mash temperature to increase beta amylase extraction.

2. The system of claim 1 , said first mashing schedule comprising a first

hold time at a first mash temperature and a second hold time at a second mash temperature, said first mash temperature being higher than said second mash temperature, when said first

user input indicates increasing mouthfeel, said second mashing schedule being adjusted by increasing mash time at said first mash temperature to increase alpha amylase extraction.

3. The system of claim 1 , said control system further configured to:

determine an expected final gravity measurement for said second mashing schedule from said performance model;

receive a measured final gravity measurement after said second mashing schedule has been executed;

determining an error being a difference between said expected final gravity measurement and said measured final gravity measurement; and update said performance model based on said error.

4. The system of claim 3 , said control system further configured to:

collect a plurality of errors from a plurality of measured final gravity measurements, each of said plurality of measured final gravity measurements being taken for a different second mashing schedule; and

update said performance model based on said plurality of errors.

5. The system of claim 4 , said plurality of measured final gravity measurements being collected from a plurality of computer controlled beer brewing systems.

6. The system of claim 5 , said performance model comprising input parameters from a group comprising:

grain bill;

machine type;

ambient temperature; and

ambient atmospheric pressure.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2024
From: PB FUNDING GROUP, LLC
To: PBAG, LLC
Reel/Frame 069657/0922 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 19, 2023
From: MITCHELL, WILLIAM H.
To: PICOBREW, INC
Reel/Frame 063027/0247 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME FROM PB FUNDING, LLC TO PB FUNDING GROUP, LLC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 053568 FRAME 0982. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE PB FUNDING, LLC. Recorded Oct 7, 2020
From: PICOBREW, INC
To: PB FUNDING GROUP, LLC
Reel/Frame 054290/0782 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 22, 2020
From: PICOBREW, INC
To: PB FUNDING, LLC
Reel/Frame 053568/0982 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 19, 2015
From: MITCHELL, WILLIAM H.
To: PICOBREW, INC.
Reel/Frame 035200/0265 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20160272928A1 · Sep 22, 2016