IP Library Granted Patent US 9,245,278
Granted Patent B2
US 9,245,278 · App. 14/671,243 · Granted Jan 26, 2016

Systems and methods for correcting translations in multi-user multi-lingual communications

Inventors: Francois Orsini (San Francisco, CA); Nikhil Bojja (Mountain View, CA); Arun Nedunchezhian (Mountain View, CA)
Assignee: Machine Zone, Inc.
G06Q30/0208G06F17/289G06F17/2854G06Q10/107G06Q30/0217G06Q50/01
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,245,278
App. No.
14/671,243
Granted
Jan 26, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various embodiments described herein facilitate multi-lingual communications. The systems and methods of some embodiments enable multi-lingual communications through different modes of communication including, for example, Internet-based chat, e-mail, text-based mobile phone communications, postings to online forums, postings to online social media services, and the like. Certain embodiments implement communication systems and methods that translate text between two or more languages. Users of the systems and methods may be incentivized to submit corrections for inaccurate or erroneous translations, and may receive a reward for these submissions. Systems and methods for assessing the accuracy of translations are described.

Claims (211)

1. A method comprising:

performing by one or more computer processors:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on a comparison of a word-based feature of the original text and the translation correction, wherein calculating the at least one metric comprises determining a difference in a number of words, characters, emojis, numbers, or punctuation marks between the original text and the translation correction; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

5. A method comprising:

performing by one or more computer processors:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on a comparison of a word-based feature of the original text and the translation correction, wherein calculating the metric comprises:

identifying a longest common subsequence of characters that occurs in the original text and the translation correction wherein each character in the subsequence is a number or a punctuation mark; and

calculating the metric as a quotient of a length of the subsequence and a maximum of a

length of the original text and a length of the translation correction; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

8. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

9. A method comprising:

performing by one or more computer processors:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on a comparison of a language-based feature of the original text and the translation correction, wherein the at least one metric is based on the comparison of the language-based feature, and wherein calculating the at least one metric comprises determining a difference in a number of occurrences of a part of speech in the original text and in the translation correction; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the part of speech is a verb, an adjective, an adverb, a noun, or a proper noun, and wherein the verb part of speech comprises a verb form selected from the group consisting of past tense, gerund, past participle, non-third person singular present, and third person singular present.

11. The method of claim 9 , further comprising updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

13. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

14. A method comprising:

performing by one or more computer processors:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on a comparison of a word-alignment feature of the original text and the translation correction, wherein calculating the at least one metric comprises determining an alignment of at least one word in the translation correction and a corresponding at least one word in the original message; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

17. The method of claim 14 , further comprising:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

18. A method comprising:

performing by one or more computer processors:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on a grammar-based feature of the translation correction, wherein calculating the at least one metric comprises:

generating a part-of-speech n-gram representation of the translation correction; and

computing a probability of the n-gram representation for the second language; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric.

19. The method of claim 18 , further comprising updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

20. The method of claim 19 , further comprising revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

21. The method of claim 18 , further comprising:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

22. A method comprising:

performing by one or more computer processors:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based a comparison of a word-based feature of the original text and the translation correction and a comparison of a language-based feature of the original text and the translation correction;

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric, wherein determining the accuracy of the translation correction comprises:

multiplying each of the first metric and the second metric by a respective coefficient; and

determining the accuracy of the translation based on whether a combination of the multiplied metrics exceeds a first threshold.

23. The method of claim 22 , further comprising updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

24. The method of claim 23 , further comprising revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

25. The method of claim 22 , further comprising:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

26. A method comprising:

performing by one or more computer processors:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on one or more of:

(a) a comparison of a word-based feature of the original text and the translation correction;

(b) a comparison of a language-based feature of the original text and the translation correction;

(c) a comparison of a word-alignment feature of the original text and the translation correction; and

(d) a grammar-based feature of the translation correction; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric wherein the at least one metric further comprises a third metric based on the comparison of the word-alignment feature, and wherein determining the accuracy of the translation correction further comprises:

multiplying the third metric by a respective coefficient;

combining the multiplied third metric with the multiplied first metric and the multiplied second metric; and

comparing the combination of multiplied metrics with a second threshold.

27. The method of claim 26 , further comprising updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

28. The method of claim 27 , further comprising revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

29. The method of claim 26 , further comprising:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

30. A system comprising:

one or more computer processors programmed to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on a comparison of a word-based feature of the original text and the translation correction, wherein calculating the at least one metric comprises determining a difference in a number of words, characters, emojis, numbers, or punctuation marks between the original text and the translation correction; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric.

31. The system of claim 30 wherein the operations further comprise:

updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

32. The system of claim 31 wherein the operations further comprise:

revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

33. The system of claim 30 wherein the operations further comprise:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

34. A system comprising:

one or more computer processors programmed to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on a comparison of a word-based feature of the original text and the translation correction, wherein calculating the metric comprises:

identifying a longest common subsequence of characters that occurs in the original text and the translation correction wherein each character in the subsequence is a number or a punctuation mark; and

calculating the metric as a quotient of a length of the subsequence and a maximum of a length of the original text and a length of the translation correction; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric.

35. The system of claim 34 wherein the operations further comprise:

updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

36. The system of claim 35 wherein the operations further comprise:

revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

37. The system of claim 34 wherein the operations further comprise:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

38. A method comprising:

one or more computer processors programmed to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on a comparison of a language-based feature of the original text and the translation correction, wherein the at least one metric is based on the comparison of the language-based feature, and wherein calculating the at least one metric comprises determining a difference in a number of occurrences of a part of speech in the original text and in the translation correction; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric.

39. The system of claim 38 wherein the operations further comprise:

updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

40. The system of claim 39 wherein the operations further comprise:

revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

41. The system of claim 38 wherein the operations further comprise:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

42. The system of claim 38 , wherein the part of speech is a verb, an adjective, an adverb, a noun, or a proper noun, and wherein the verb part of speech comprises a verb form selected from the group consisting of past tense, gerund, past participle, non-third person singular present, and third person singular present.

43. A system comprising:

one or more computer processors programmed to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on a comparison of a word-alignment feature of the original text and the translation correction, wherein calculating the at least one metric comprises determining an alignment of at least one word in the translation correction and a corresponding at least one word in the original message; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric.

44. The system of claim 43 wherein the operations further comprise:

updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

45. The system of claim 44 wherein the operations further comprise:

revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

46. The system of claim 43 wherein the operations further comprise:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

47. A system comprising:

one or more computer processors programmed to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on a grammar-based feature of the translation correction, wherein calculating the at least one metric comprises:

generating a part-of-speech n-gram representation of the translation correction; and

computing a probability of the n-gram representation for the second language; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric.

48. The system of claim 47 wherein the operations further comprise:

updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

49. The system of claim 48 wherein the operations further comprise:

revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

50. The system of claim 47 wherein the operations further comprise:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

51. A system comprising:

one or more computer processors programmed to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based a comparison of a word-based feature of the original text and the translation correction and a comparison of a language-based feature of the original text and the translation correction;

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric, wherein determining the accuracy of the translation correction comprises:

multiplying each of the first metric and the second metric by a respective coefficient; and

determining the accuracy of the translation based on whether a combination of the multiplied metrics exceeds a first threshold.

52. The system of claim 51 wherein the operations further comprise:

updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

53. The system of claim 52 wherein the operations further comprise:

revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

54. The system of claim 51 wherein the operations further comprise:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

55. A system comprising:

one or more computer processors programmed to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an original text message in a first language authored by a first user:

obtaining an initial translation of the original text message in a second language;

obtaining a translation correction of the initial translation, wherein the translation correction is authored by a second user;

calculating at least one metric associated with the translation correction, the at least one metric being based on one or more of:

(a) a comparison of a word-based feature of the original text and the translation correction;

(b) a comparison of a language-based feature of the original text and the translation correction;

(c) a comparison of a word-alignment feature of the original text and the translation correction; and

(d) a grammar-based feature of the translation correction; and

determining an accuracy of the translation correction based on the at least one metric wherein the at least one metric further comprises a third metric based on the comparison of the word-alignment feature, and wherein determining the accuracy of the translation correction further comprises:

multiplying the third metric by a respective coefficient;

combining the multiplied third metric with the multiplied first metric and the multiplied second metric; and

comparing the combination of multiplied metrics with a second threshold.

56. The system of claim 55 wherein the operations further comprise:

updating a confidence score for the second user based on the accuracy of the translation correction, the confidence score representing a likelihood that the second user will provide an accurate translation of a text message at a later time.

57. The system of claim 56 wherein the operations further comprise:

revoking the second user's translation privileges when the confidence score falls below a threshold value.

58. The system of claim 55 wherein the operations further comprise:

offering an incentive to the second user to provide the translation correction; and

rewarding the second user with the respective incentive when the translation correction is determined to be accurate.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 19, 2020
From: COMERICA BANK
To: MZ IP HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 052706/0899 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 19, 2020
From: MGG INVESTMENT GROUP LP, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: MACHINE ZONE, INC.; SATORI WORLDWIDE, LLC; COGNANT LLC
Reel/Frame 052706/0917 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 22, 2018
From: MZ IP HOLDINGS, LLC
To: COMERICA BANK
Reel/Frame 046215/0207 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 29, 2018
From: MACHINE ZONE, INC.
To: MZ IP HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 045786/0179 →
NOTICE OF SECURITY INTEREST -- PATENTS Recorded Feb 2, 2018
From: MACHINE ZONE, INC.; SATORI WORLDWIDE, LLC; COGNANT LLC
To: MGG INVESTMENT GROUP LP, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045237/0861 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2015
From: ORSINI, FRANCOIS; BOJJA, NIKHIL; NEDUNCHEZHIAN, ARUN
To: MACHINE ZONE, INC.
Reel/Frame 035547/0989 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 14294668 · Jun 3, 2014
Continuation In Part 13908979 · Jun 3, 2013
Continuation In Part 13763565 · Feb 8, 2013
Provisional Application 61778282 · Mar 12, 2013
Related Publication 20150262209A1 · Sep 17, 2015