IP Library Granted Patent US 9,550,172
Granted Patent B2
US 9,550,172 · App. 14/672,636 · Granted Jan 24, 2017

Promoted, attrition resistant, silica supported precipitated iron catalyst

Inventors: Dawid J. Duvenhage (Evergreen, CO); Belma Demirel (Clarendon Hills, IL)
Assignee: RES USA, LLC
B01J23/78B01J21/08B01J23/745B01J35/002B01J35/02B01J37/0201B01J37/031B01J37/038B01J37/04B01J37/08C10G2/33B01J35/1014B01J35/1061C10G2/331C10G2/332
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,550,172
App. No.
14/672,636
Granted
Jan 24, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A structurally promoted precipitated catalyst containing crystalline silica, at least one chemical promoter selected from the group consisting of alkali metals, and iron, the structurally promoted precipitated catalyst comprising maghemite and hematite catalytic phases, and exhibiting a main reduction peak temperature, as determined by TPR, in the range of from about 210° C. to about 350° C. A method of producing the structurally promoted precipitated catalyst is also provided.

Claims (21)

1. A method of producing a structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst, the method comprising:

dissolving crystalline silica in an aqueous solution consisting essentially of water and at least one chemical promoter selected from the group consisting of alkali metal bases, thus forming an alkali-silicate support solution;

effecting double promotion of a precipitated iron catalyst slurry by combining the alkali-silicate support solution with the precipitated iron catalyst slurry to form an attrition resistant catalyst slurry; and

drying the attrition resistant catalyst slurry to yield the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the alkali-silicate support solution comprises no significant concentration of salt.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the structural support further comprises a support selected from boehmite, amorphous silica, silicic acid, tetraethyl orthosilicate, alumina, MgAl 2 O 4 , activated carbon, zirconium oxide and combinations thereof.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the chemical promoter comprises alkali hydroxide.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the chemical promoter is selected from the group consisting of potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, and combinations thereof.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising stirring the alkali-silicate support solution at 100° C. prior to combination thereof with the precipitated iron catalyst slurry.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the attrition resistant catalyst slurry is dried at a temperature of from about 80° C. to about 100° C.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising calcining the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst at a temperature of from about 300° C. to about 380° C.

9. The method of claim 8 further comprising heating the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst at a temperature less than the calcination temperature prior to calcination.

10. The method of claim 1 further comprising calcining the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst at a temperature of from about 300° C. to about 320° C.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein jet attrition resistance testing of the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst yields less than 7% fines after 5 hours.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein jet attrition resistance testing of the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst yields less than 5% fines after 5 hours.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein jet attrition resistance testing of the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst yields substantially no fines after 5 hours of testing.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst has a main reduction peak temperature, as determined by TPR, in the range of from about 210° C. to about 350° C.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst has a main reduction peak temperature of less than 240° C.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst comprises SiO 2 :Fe in a weight ratio of from about 2:100 to about 24:100.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst comprises SiO 2 :Fe in a weight ratio of from about 6:100 to about 12:100.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the structurally promoted precipitated iron catalyst comprises K:Fe in a weight ratio of from about 1:100 to about 10:100.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 30, 2015
From: DUVENHAGE, DAWID J.; DEMIREL, BELMA
To: RENTECH, INC.
Reel/Frame 035287/0053 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 30, 2015
From: RENTECH, INC.
To: RES USA, LLC
Reel/Frame 035287/0125 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 12207859 · Sep 10, 2008
Provisional Application 60972458 · Sep 14, 2007
Related Publication 20150251167A1 · Sep 10, 2015