IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,207,859
Granted Patent B2
US 12,207,859 · App. 18/747,645 · Granted Jan 28, 2025

Systems for incising tissue

Inventors: Michael W. Wiltberger (Santa Clara, CA); Phillip Gooding (Mountain View, CA); Dan E. Andersen (Menlo Park, CA)
Assignee: INSIGHTFUL INSTRUMENTS, INC.
A61B18/042A61B2018/0019A61B2018/00601A61B2018/144A61F9/00781A61F9/0079H05H1/466H05H2245/32
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,207,859
App. No.
18/747,645
Granted
Jan 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An elongate electrode is configured to flex and generate plasma to incise tissue. An electrical energy source operatively coupled to the electrode is configured to provide electrical energy to the electrode to generate the plasma. A tensioning element is operatively coupled to the elongate electrode. The tensioning element can be configured to provide tension to the elongate electrode to allow the elongate electrode to flex in response to the elongate electrode engaging the tissue and generating the plasma. The tensioning element operatively coupled to the flexible elongate electrode may allow for the use of a small diameter electrode, such as a 5 μm to 20 μm diameter electrode, which can allow narrow incisions to be formed with decreased tissue damage. In some embodiments, the tensioning of the electrode allows the electrode to more accurately incise tissue by decreasing variations in the position of the electrode along the incision path.

Claims (31)

1. A system for incising tissue with a plasma, comprising:

an elongate electrode, the elongate electrode configured to flex and generate the plasma to incise the tissue;

an electrical energy source operatively coupled to the elongate electrode and configured to provide electrical energy to the elongate electrode to generate the plasma;

a tensioning element operatively coupled to the elongate electrode, the tensioning element configured to provide tension to the elongate electrode to allow the elongate electrode to flex in response to the elongate electrode engaging the tissue and generating the plasma; and

a contact surface operatively coupled to the elongate electrode, the contact surface configured to engage a portion the tissue to shape the tissue prior to incising the tissue with the elongate electrode, wherein the contact surface comprises a plurality of independently adjustable actuators to shape the tissue.

2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a plurality of arms operatively coupled to the elongate electrode and the tensioning element.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the elongate electrode is unsupported between two arms of the plurality of arms.

4. The system of claim 2 , wherein the elongate electrode is configured to vibrate transversely to an elongate axis of the elongate electrode.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the contact surface comprises a first contact surface having a first surface profile and a second contact surface having a second surface profile, a difference between the first surface profile and the second surface profile corresponding to a shape profile of a volume of tissue to be removed.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the contact surface comprises a free-form optical surface.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the contact surface comprises a deformable membrane operatively coupled to the plurality of independently adjustable actuators.

8. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a sterile barrier for placement on the contact surface to maintain sterility of the tissue.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the sterile barrier comprises a barrier configured to conform to the shape of the contact surface with the sterile barrier between the tissue and the contact surface.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the sterile barrier comprises a peel-and-stick sterile barrier.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

a length of the elongate electrode is within a range from about 6 mm to about 12 mm;

the tissue comprises ocular tissue;

the elongate electrode comprises a wire having a diameter within a range from about 5 μm to about 20 μm; and

wherein the tensioning element is configured to provide a tension to the elongate electrode within a range from about 100 mN to about 500 mN.

12. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a processor operatively coupled to the elongate electrode, the processor configured with instructions to advance the elongate electrode distally and draw the elongate electrode proximally.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein:

the elongate electrode is sized for insertion into the tissue;

the processor is configured with instructions to incise the tissue with the elongate electrode to define a volume of incised tissue; and

wherein the volume of incised tissue comprises a shape profile.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is configured with instructions to move the elongate electrode with a first movement to define a first surface on a first side of the volume of incised tissue and move with a second movement to define a second surface on a second side of the volume of incised tissue.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is configured with instructions to advance the elongate electrode distally to define a first surface on a first side of the volume of incised tissue and to draw the elongate electrode proximally to define a second surface on a second side of the volume of incised tissue.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein a gap extends between the elongate electrode and a support structure and wherein the gap is sized to receive tissue and wherein tissue extending into the gap is incised when the elongate electrode is drawn proximally.

17. The system of claim 13 , the contact surface comprises a first configuration to define a first surface on a first side of the volume of tissue and a second configuration to define a second surface on a second side of the volume of tissue.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the contact surface comprises a first shape profile to define a first surface on a first side of the volume of tissue and a second shape profile to define a second surface on a second side of the volume of tissue.

19. The system of claim 13 , wherein the shape profile comprises a thickness profile.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2024
From: WILTBERGER, MICHAEL W.; GOODING, PHILLIP; ANDERSEN, DAN E.
To: INSIGHTFUL INSTRUMENTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 067769/0634 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 18390759 · Dec 20, 2023
Continuation 17935401 · Sep 26, 2022
Continuation 17250965
Provisional Application 62966925 · Jan 28, 2020
Provisional Application 62931226 · Nov 6, 2019
Related Publication 20240335224A1 · Oct 10, 2024
References Cited (70)
US 4542742A · Winkelman · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 5215104A · Steinert · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5556406A · Gordon · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5683366A · Eggers · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 5833701A · Gordon · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6312440B1 · Hood · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6358260B1 · Ross · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6730075B2 · Palanker · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6780178B2 · Palanker · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7238185B2 · Palanker · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7357802B2 · Palanker · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7789879B2 · Palanker · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7922735B2 · Daxer · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8043286B2 · Palanker · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8088126B2 · Fugo · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8177783B2 · Davison · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8292877B2 · Raksi · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8323276B2 · Palanker · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8414572B2 · Davison · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8870864B2 · Davison · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9018983B2 · Vankov · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 11490948B2 · Wiltberger · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11896283B2 · Wiltberger · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12053220B1 · Wiltberger · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20010025117A1 · Hong · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20010025177A1 · Woloszko · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 20030084907A1 · Pacek · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060064113A1 · Nakao · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070280994A1 · Cunanan · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070282328A1 · Yahagi · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080021444A1 · Scoption · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080039832A1 · Palanker · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080125774A1 · Palanker · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080281303A1 · Culbertson · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090187184A1 · Muller · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090301860A1 · Iida · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110190741A1 · Deisinger · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110276089A1 · Straehnz · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110301637A1 · Kerr · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110313344A1 · Daxer · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120245580A1 · Germain · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150282822A1 · Trees · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150297257A1 · Galer · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150297280A1 · Li · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160074226A1 · Spooner · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170105797A1 · Mikkaichi · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170333114A1 · Atwell · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190328377A1 · Johnson · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200254270A1 · Wandke · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 208426205 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP H11501555 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019503228 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 1997018765 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0009055A1 · 2000 [cited by examiner]
WO 2017124062 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021092628 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Aǧca, Alper, et al. “Comparison of Visual Acuity and Higher-Order Aberrations after Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction.” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 37, No. 4, Aug. 2014, pp… [cited by applicant]
Ang, Marcus, et al. “Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Laser in-Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK): Study Protocol for a Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial.” Trials, vol. 13, May 2012, p. 75, doi:10/gbbgv5. [cited by applicant]
Ganesh, Sri, et al. “Refractive Lenticule Extraction Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: A New Refractive Surgery Paradigm.” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 66, No. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 10-19, doi:10/gcrf6z. [cited by applicant]
Gyldenkerne, Anders, et al. “Comparison of Corneal Shape Changes and Aberrations Induced by FS-LASIK and SMILE for Myopia.” Journal of Refractive Surgery, Mar. 2015, doi:10/f684jm. [cited by applicant]
Hammer, D. X., et al. “Experimental Investigation of Ultrashort Pulse Laser-Induced Breakdown Thresholds in Aqueous Media.” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 1996, pp. 670-678, doi:10.1109/3.4888… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2020/070757, 10 pages (Mar. 23, 2021). [cited by applicant]
Lombardo, Marco, and Giuseppe Lombardo. “Wave Aberration of Human Eyes and New Descriptors of Image Optical Quality and Visual Performance.” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 36, No. 2, Feb. 2010, pp. 313-3… [cited by applicant]
Palanker, D. V., et al. “Pulsed Electron Avalanche Knife (PEAK) for Intraocular Surgery.” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 42, No. 11, Oct. 2001, pp. 2673-2678. [cited by applicant]
Pallikaris, I. G., et al. “Laser in Situ Keratomileusis.” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 10, No. 5, 1990, pp. 463-468, doi:10/cpjdwq. [cited by applicant]
Peponis, Vasileios, et al. “The Use of the Fugo Blade in Corneal Surgery: A Preliminary Animal Study.” Cornea, vol. 25, No. 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 206-208, doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000179927.12899.bb. [cited by applicant]
Reinstein, Dan Z., et al. “Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) History, Fundamentals of a New Refractive Surgery Technique and Clinical Outcomes.” Eye and Vision, vol. 1, No. 1, Dec. 2014, p. 3, doi:10/gh2btx. [cited by applicant]
Sekundo W., Chapters 1, 6, 13, 15, and 19, from “Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Principles, Techniques, Complication Management, and Future Concepts,” 65 pages (2015). [cited by applicant]
Shen, Yang, et al. “Comparison of Corneal Deformation Parameters After Smile, Lasek, and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK.” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, No. 5, May 2014, pp. 310-318, doi: 10/f56ckn. [cited by applicant]
Shen, Zeren, et al. “Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” PloS One, vol. 11, No. 7, 2016, p.… [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,558,264