IP Library Granted Patent US 9,444,515
Granted Patent B2
US 9,444,515 · App. 14/695,387 · Granted Sep 13, 2016

Short-range zigbee compatible receiver with near-threshold digital baseband

Inventors: Osama U. Khan (Berkeley, CA); David D. Wentzloff (Ann Arbor, MI)
Assignee: The Regents Of The University Of Michigan
H04B1/7073H04L25/40H04W4/008H04W24/02H04W24/08Y02B60/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,444,515
App. No.
14/695,387
Granted
Sep 13, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

An 8.1 nJ/bit 2.4 GHz receiver with integrated digital baseband supporting Q-QPSK DSSS modulation compliant with the IEEE 802.15.4 standard is presented that targets short-range, Internet of Things applications (IoTs). The sensitivity of a wireless communication receiver in general trades with power consumption. This receiver exploits this tradeoff to achieve a total power consumption of 2.02 mW including ADCs and digital baseband processing, at a sensitivity of −52.5 dBm at 250 Kbps. The energy-efficiency of the radio frequency (RF) front-end alone is nearly two times better than the prior art. The receiver was fabricated in 65 nm CMOS with an area of 0.86 mm 2 .

Claims (42)

1. A method for operating a short-range receiver with a digital baseband processor, comprising:

receiving, by a RF front-end circuit in the receiver, a network data packet over a data link of a wireless network;

sampling, by an analog-to-digital converter, a portion of the network data packet at a given sampling rate;

determining, by the digital baseband processor, a metric indicative of quality of the data link over which the network data packet was received;

lowering, by the digital baseband processor, the given sampling rate of the network data packet to a reduced uniform or non-uniform sampling rate, where the reduced sampling rate is set inversely to quality of the data link and has a value lower than the given sampling rate; and

processing, by the digital baseband processor, remainder of the network data packet at the reduced sampling rate, wherein lowering the given sampling rate further comprises disabling the analog-to-digital converter for a portion of the sampling interval and disabling at least one other active circuit in the receiver for the portion of the sampling interval.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the portion of the network data packet is further defined as a header of the network data packet.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the given sampling rate is defined by a Nyquist rate.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the metric is selected from a group consisting of a signal-to-noise ratio, a received signal strength index and a link quality indicator.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein lowering the given sampling rate further comprises

comparing the metric to a threshold;

lowering the given sampling rate to the reduced sampling rate and processing the remainder of the network data packet when the metric is above a threshold; and

processing the remainder of the data unit at the given sampling rate when the metric is below the threshold.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein lowering the given sampling rate further comprises

ranking samples from the portion of the network data packet according to energy level;

selecting a subset of the samples having highest energy level, where the number of selected samples correlates to the reduced sampling rate; and

sampling the remainder of the network data packet in accordance with the selected subset of samples.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprises receiving another network data packet at the receiver and repeating the steps of the method for the another network data packet.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprises monitoring the quality of the data link and continue processing additional network data packets at the reduced sampling rate until the quality of the data link changes.

9. The method of claim 8 further comprises detecting a change in quality of the data link, determining the metric indicative of quality of the data link, and setting the given sampling rate to a value that is inversely related to quality of the data link.

10. A method for operating a short-range receiver with a near-threshold digital baseband processor, comprising:

receiving, by the receiver, a protocol data unit over a channel in a wireless network;

sampling, by the receiver, a portion of the data unit at a given sampling rate;

determining, by the receiver, a metric indicative of quality of the channel over which the data unit was received;

comparing, by the receiver, the metric to a threshold;

processing the remainder of the data unit at a reduced uniform or non-uniform sampling rate when the metric is above the threshold, where the reduced sampling rate is lower than given sampling rate and the processing of the remainder of the data unit at the reduced sampling rate includes

ranking samples from the portion of the data unit according to energy level;

selecting a subset of the samples having highest energy level, where the number of selected samples correlates to the reduced sampling rate;

sampling the remainder of the network data packet in accordance with the selected subset of samples; and

processing the remainder of the data unit at the given sampling rate when the metric is below the threshold.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the portion of the data unit is further defined as a synchronization header of a data unit.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein the given sampling rate is defined by a Nyquist rate.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein the metric is further defined as a signal-to-noise ratio.

14. The method of claim 10 further comprises repeating the steps of the method for each new protocol data unit received.

15. The method of claim 10 further comprises monitoring the quality of the channel and continuing to process additional data units at the reduced sampling rate until the quality of the channel changes.

16. The method of claim 15 further comprises detecting a change in quality of the channel, determining the metric indicative of quality of the channel, and setting the given sampling rate to a value that is inversely related to quality of the channel.

17. A short-range receiver operating in a wireless network, comprising:

an RF front-end circuit configured to receive an RF analog signal from an antenna and operates to shift the RF analog signal to an intermediate signal having a different frequency;

an analog-to-digital converter configured to receive the intermediate signal from the RF front-end circuit and convert the intermediate signal to a digital signal; and

a digital baseband processor configured to receive the digital signal from the analog-to-digital converter and processes the digital signal at a prescribed sampling rate, the baseband processor includes

a link quality module that determines a metric indicative of quality of data link over which the RF analog signal was received and set the prescribed sampling rate to a value that is inversely related to the quality of the data link; and

a decoder that samples the digital signal at the prescribed sampling rate and outputs a sequence of data bits derived from the digital signal, wherein the link quality module implements the prescribed sampling rate by disabling operation of the analog-to-digital converter for a portion of the sampling interval and disabling operation of at least one other active circuit in the receiver for the portion of the sampling interval.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jul 21, 2016
From: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 039207/0410 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 6, 2015
From: KHAN, OSAMA U.; WENTZLOFF, DAVID D.
To: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
Reel/Frame 035980/0143 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61984316 · Apr 25, 2014
Related Publication 20150311946A1 · Oct 29, 2015