IP Library Granted Patent US 9,906,544
Granted Patent B1
US 9,906,544 · App. 14/957,485 · Granted Feb 27, 2018

Method and apparatus to detect non-human users on computer systems

Inventor: Sreenath Kurupati (Sunnyvale, CA)
Assignee: Akamai Technologies, Inc.
H04L63/1425H04L63/1416
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,906,544
App. No.
14/957,485
Granted
Feb 27, 2018
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods and systems for malicious non-human user detection on computing devices are described. The method includes collecting, by a processing device, raw data corresponding to a user action, converting, by the processing device, the raw data to features, wherein the features represent characteristics of a human user or a malicious code acting as if it were the human user, and comparing, by the processing device, at least one of the features against a corresponding portion of a characteristic model to differentiate the human user from the malicious code acting as if it were the human user.

Claims (34)

1. A method of improving a processing device having a client component and a server component, comprising:

collecting, by the client component of the processing device, raw data corresponding to a user action;

converting, at least in part by the client component of the processing device, the raw data to features, wherein the features represent characteristics of a human user or a malicious code acting as if it were the human user;

comparing, by the client component of the processing device, at least one of the features against a corresponding portion of a characteristic model to determine, in a replay check, whether the at least one feature is indicative of a replay by the malicious code; and

upon a determination that the at least one feature is not indicative of a replay by the malicious code, further processing the features by the server component of the processing device against another portion of the characteristic model in a behavior check to determine whether the features represent a behavior of the human user;

wherein performing the replay check at the client component while performing the behavior check at the server component provides for an improved operation of the processing device.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising processing the raw data to reduce an effect of noise, perturbation, or randomization.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the replay check comprises performing at least one of an exact match or a nearest neighbor match.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising hashing the raw data to perform the replay check.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein collecting the raw data corresponding to the user action further comprises receiving the raw data from an input device comprising at least one of: a mouse, a keyboard, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, and a sensor.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising rejecting the user action in response to a detection that the user action is from the malicious code acting as if it were the human user.

7. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processing device having a client component and a server component, cause the processing device to perform operations, comprising:

collecting, by the client component of the processing device, raw data corresponding to a user action;

converting, at least in part by the client component of the processing device, the raw data to features, wherein the features represent characteristics of a human user or a malicious code acting as if it were the human user;

comparing, by the client component of the processing device, at least one of the features against a corresponding portion of a characteristic model to determine, in a replay check, whether the at least one feature is indicative of a replay by the malicious code; and

upon a determination that the at least one feature is not indicative of a replay by the malicious code, further processing the features by the server component of the processing device against another portion of the characteristic model in a behavior check to determine whether the features represent a behavior of the human user;

wherein performing the replay check at the client component while performing the behavior check at the server component provides for an improved operation of the processing device.

8. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions of claim 7 , wherein the operations further comprise processing the raw data to reduce an effect of noise, perturbation, or randomization.

9. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions of claim 7 , wherein the replay check comprises performing at least one of an exact match check or a nearest neighbor match.

10. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions of claim 7 , wherein the operations further comprise hashing the raw data to perform the replay check.

11. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions of claim 7 , wherein collecting the raw data corresponding to the user action further comprises receiving the raw data from an input device comprising at least one of: a mouse, a keyboard, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, and a sensor.

12. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions of claim 7 , wherein the operations further comprise rejecting the user action in response to a detection that the user action is from the malicious code acting as if it were the human user, wherein rejecting the user action further comprises at least one of denying access, performing an additional check, logging the event, or generating an alert.

13. A computing system, comprising:

a data storage device; and

a processing device having a client component and a server component, coupled to the data storage device, to:

collect, by the client component of the processing device, raw data corresponding to a user action;

convert, at least in part by the client component of the processing device, the raw data to features, wherein the features represent characteristics of a human user or a malicious code acting as if it were the human user;

compare, by the client component of the processing device, at least one of the features against a corresponding portion of a characteristic model to determine, in a replay check, whether the at least one feature is indicative of a replay by the malicious code; and

upon a determination that the at least one feature is not indicative of a replay by the malicious code, further process the features by the server component of the processing device against another portion of the characteristic model in a behavior check to determine whether the features represent a behavior of the human user;

wherein performing the replay check at the client component while performing the behavior check at the server component provides for an improved operation of the processing device.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processing device is further to process the raw data to reduce an effect of noise, perturbation, or randomization of the at least one of the features against the corresponding portion of the characteristic model.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the replay check comprises performing at least one of an exact match check or a nearest neighbor match.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processing device is further to receive the raw data from an input device comprising at least one of: a mouse, a keyboard, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, and a sensor.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processing device is further operative to reject the user action in response to a detection that the user action is from the malicious code acting as if it were the human user.

Assignments (4)
MERGER Recorded Apr 13, 2017
From: CYBERFEND, INC.
To: AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 041995/0434 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 12, 2017
From: CYBERFEND, INC.
To: CHIMERA ACQUISTION CORP. D/B/A CYBERFEND, INC.
Reel/Frame 041979/0221 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE APPLICATION NUMBERS AND FILING DATES INSIDE THE ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 037209 FRAME: 0167. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Nov 18, 2016
From: KURUPATI, SREENATH
To: CYBERFEND, INC.
Reel/Frame 040647/0070 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 3, 2015
From: KURUPATI, SREENATH
To: CYBERFEND, INC.
Reel/Frame 037209/0167 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 62086668 · Dec 2, 2014