IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,509,372
Granted Patent B2
US 10,509,372 · App. 14/982,691 · Granted Dec 17, 2019

Automated tuning of multiple fuel gas turbine combustion systems

Inventor: Christopher Chandler (Austin, TX)
Assignee: Gas Turbine Efficiency Sweden AB
G05B13/00F02C9/28F02C9/40F23N1/002F23N5/003F23N5/242F23R3/34F23R3/36G05B19/05F05D2260/80F05D2270/082F05D2270/083F05D2270/303F05D2270/31F23K2301/204F23K2301/206F23N2037/08F23N2041/20F23R2900/00013G05B2219/1204
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,509,372
App. No.
14/982,691
Granted
Dec 17, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided herein is a method for automated control of the gas turbine fuel composition through automated modification of the ratio of fuel gas from multiple sources. The method includes providing first and second fuel sources. The method further includes sensing the operational parameters of a turbine and determining whether the operational parameters are within preset operational limits. The method also adjusting the ration of the first fuel source to the second fuel source, based on whether the operational parameters are within the preset operational limits.

Claims (54)

1. A method for automated control of a combustion turbine fuel composition through automated modification of a ratio of fuel gas, comprising:

providing a first fuel source;

providing a second fuel source;

supplying fuel to a combustion turbine in a blend of fuel from the first source and second source;

specifying one or more first tuning priorities, wherein the first tuning priorities comprise one or more selected from the group comprising NOx levels, power level and combustion dynamics, wherein specifying the NOx levels or combustion dynamics tuning priority comprises adjusting the tuning priority within a range and specifying the power level tuning priority comprises switching on or switching off the tuning priority, and wherein the specifying of the one or more first tuning priorities operates to change a first set of stored operational standards;

specifying one or more second tuning priorities, wherein the specifying of the one or more second tuning priorities operates to overlay a second set of stored operational standards upon the first set of stored operational standards, wherein the specifying of the one or more second tuning priorities comprises switching on or switching off the second tuning priority;

sensing in real-time or near real operational parameters of the gas turbine;

determining whether the operational parameters are within the first or second set of stored operational standards;

adjusting the blend of the first fuel source and the second fuel source, based on whether the operational parameters are within the second set of stored operational standards.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing a hierarchy of the one or more first and one or more second tuning priorities; and

setting the first and second set of stored operational standards based on the hierarchy of the tuning priorities.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein providing a hierarchy of the one or more first and one or more second tuning priorities comprises ranking the tuning priorities according to an end user's preferences.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

making incremental adjustments of at least one operational parameter of the turbine.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein making incremental adjustments of at least one operational parameter of the turbine comprises making incremental adjustments in one or more operational parameters of the turbine,

wherein the one or more operational parameters comprise one or more selected from the group comprising combustor fuel distribution split within the nozzles of the combustor, fuel gas inlet temperature, and fuel/air ratio within the turbine.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of adjusting the ratio of the first fuel sources to the second fuel source comprises making incremental adjustments of at least one operational parameter of the turbine.

7. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising producing one or more indicators if the operational parameters are not within the operational standards, wherein the one or more indicators are ranked based on the severity of the indicator.

8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the one or more indicators are further ranked based on the one or more first and one or more second tuning priorities, such that indicators of the same magnitude are ranked based on the one or more first and one or more second tuning priorities.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein adjusting the blend of the first fuel source to the second fuel source comprises making incremental adjustments of the ratio of the first fuel source to second fuel source in one or more operational parameters of the turbine.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the one or more second tuning priorities comprise fuel blend ratio.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first fuel source is pipeline quality fuel.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the second fuel source is non-pipeline quality fuel.

13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the blend comprises 0-100% of the first fuel source.

14. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the blend comprises 0-100% of the second fuel source.

15. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the blend is the inverse ratio of the first fuel source.

16. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the blend is the inverse ratio of the second fuel source.

17. The method according to claim 1 , wherein fuel blend adjustments are done incrementally.

18. A tuning system for automated control of a gas turbine fuel composition through automated modification of a ratio of fuel gas, comprising:

operational turbine controls for controlling operational control elements of the turbine,

a tuning controller communicating with the controls, the controller configured to tune the operation of the turbine in accordance with the following:

specifying one or more first tuning priorities, wherein the first tuning priorities comprise one or more selected from the group comprising NOx levels, power level and combustion dynamics, wherein specifying the NOx levels or combustion dynamics tuning priority comprises adjusting the tuning priority within a range and specifying the power level tuning priority comprises switching on or switching off the tuning priority, and wherein the specifying of the one or more first tuning priories operates to change a first set of stored operational standards;

specifying one or more second tuning priorities, wherein the specifying of the one or more second tuning priorities operates to overlay a second set of stored operational standards upon the first set of stored operational standards, wherein the specifying of the one or more second tuning priorities comprises switching on or switching off the second tuning priority;

receiving real-time or near real-time operational data about the turbine,

determining whether the operational data is within the first or second set of stored operational standards; and

providing a blend of fuel to a level blend ratio controller, the blend having fuel from at least one of a first and second fuel source ratio controller, the fuel blend ratio controller adjusting the ratio of the first fuel source and the second fuel source based on whether the operational data are within the second set of stored operational standards.

19. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein tuning the operation of the turbine comprises making incremental adjustments of at least one operational control element of the turbine.

20. The tuning system according to claim 18 , further comprising at least one sensor for sensing at least one of combustor dynamics or turbine exhaust emissions.

21. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the one or more indicators are ranked based on the severity of each indicator.

22. The tuning system according to claim 21 , wherein the one or more indicators are further ranked based on the tuning priorities, such that indicators of the same magnitude are ranked based on the tuning priorities.

23. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein providing the blend of the first fuel source to the second fuel source comprises making incremental adjustments of the ratio of the first fuel source to second fuel source in one or more operational parameters of the turbine.

24. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein tuning the operation of the turbine based on dominant tuning concern comprises making incremental adjustments in one or more operational control elements of the turbine, wherein the one or more operational control elements comprise one or more from the group comprising combustor fuel distribution split within the nozzles of the combustor, fuel gas inlet temperature, and fuel/air ratio within the turbine.

25. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the one or more indicators comprises one or more alarm levels indicating that the operational data of the turbine is outside of allowable limits of the turbine.

26. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the one or more second tuning priorities for the turbine comprise fuel blend ratio.

27. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the tuning controller communicates with the operational turbine controls through a distribution control system (DCS).

28. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the tuning controller communicated directly with the turbine controller.

29. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the first fuel source is pipeline quality fuel.

30. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the second fuel source is non-pipeline quality fuel.

31. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the blend comprises 0-100% of the first fuel source.

32. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the blend comprises 0-100% of the second fuel source.

33. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the blend is the inverse ratio of the first fuel source.

34. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein the blend is the inverse ratio of the second fuel source.

35. The tuning system according to claim 18 , wherein fuel blend adjustments are done incrementally.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 5, 2026
From: GAS TURBINE EFFICIENCY SWEDEN AB
To: NAES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 074569/0079 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 29, 2015
From: CHANDLER, CHRISTOPHER
To: GAS TURBINE EFFICIENCY SWEDEN AB
Reel/Frame 037376/0808 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 13767920 · Feb 15, 2013
Continuation In Part 13542222 · Jul 5, 2012
Continuation In Part 12463060 · May 8, 2009
Related Publication 20160108820A1 · Apr 21, 2016