IP Library Granted Patent US 9,403,593
Granted Patent B2
US 9,403,593 · App. 15/019,165 · Granted Aug 2, 2016

Distributed unmanned aerial vehicle architecture

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,403,593
App. No.
15/019,165
Granted
Aug 2, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for a distributed system architecture for unmanned air vehicles. One of the methods includes obtaining information identifying flight information of a UAV, with the flight information including flight phase information or a contingency condition associated with a flight critical module included in the UAV. The obtained information is analyzed, and one or more first payload modules are determined to enter a modified power state. Requests to enter the modified power state are caused to be transmitted to each determined payload module in the one or more first payload modules.

Claims (74)

1. An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flight processing system comprising:

an interface configured to communicate with one or more payload modules including a first payload module;

an interface configured to communicate with one or more flight critical modules;

one or more processors comprising hardware, the one or more processors configured to at least:

obtain information identifying flight information of the UAV, the flight information comprising flight phase information or a contingency condition associated with a flight critical module;

analyze the identified flight information;

determine, based at least in part on the analysis of the identified flight information, respective acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules; and

cause, at least in part, the one or more payload modules to use up to the respective acceptable data bandwidth usages.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight information identifies a contingency condition associated with the flight critical module, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to:

based on information associated with the contingency condition, block delivery of data messages associated with the first payload module.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, modify an ability of the first payload module to deliver data messages over a data bus.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, block delivery of data messages from being sent to, or from, the first payload module.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, restrict the use of a data bus by the one or more payload modules.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, prioritize the use of a data bus by the one or more flight critical modules over the first payload module.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, store in a data structure, data messages sent to, or from, the first payload module, and provide the data messages to an intended module based on a change in the flight information.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining acceptable data bandwidth usages comprises:

determining the acceptable data bandwidth usage of the one or more payload modules so as not to interfere with bandwidth usage of the one or more flight critical modules.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the flight information indicates a present flight phase associated with the UAV in flight, and wherein the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages are based on a determination of sufficient bandwidth for the one or more flight critical modules.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, instruct the first payload module not to place data messages on, or consume bandwidth of, a data bus shared with the one or more flight critical modules.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, restrict use of a data transmission radio for data by the one or more payload modules.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the flight information identifies a contingency condition associated with a lost global positioning system lock.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight information indicates a present flight phase, and wherein the determined data bandwidth usage for the first payload module is substantially no data bandwidth usage, wherein determining acceptable data bandwidth usage for the first payload module is based on a determination that the first payload module is not needed during the present flight phase.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight phase information indicates a present flight phase associated with configuration of the UAV, and wherein the acceptable data bandwidth usage for each payload module is all data bandwidth usage requested by the payload module.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight phase information indicates a present flight phase associated with launching of the UAV, and wherein the acceptable data bandwidth usage for each payload module is substantially no data bandwidth usage.

16. A method comprising:

obtaining, by a system comprising hardware included in an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and in communication with at least a first payload module and one or more flight critical modules included in the UAV, information identifying flight information of the UAV, the flight information comprising flight phase information or a contingency condition associated with a flight critical module;

analyzing the identified flight information;

determining, based at least in part on the analysis of the identified flight information, respective acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules; and

causing, at least in part, the one or more payload modules to use up to the respective acceptable data bandwidth usages.

17. A system included in an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), the system comprising:

a flight system comprising one or more processors, the flight system connected, via one or more data buses, to one or more flight modules;

a payload system comprising one or more processors, the payload system connected, via one or more payload data buses, to one or more payload modules including a first flight module;

wherein the one or more processors of the flight system are configured to at least:

obtain information identifying flight information of the UAV, the flight information comprising flight phase information or a contingency condition associated with the one or more critical flight modules; and

provide the flight information to the payload system; and

wherein the one or more processors of the payload system are configured to at least:

receive the flight information from the flight system;

analyze the identified flight information;

determine, based at least in part on the analysis of the identified flight information, acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules; and

cause, at least in part, the one or more payload modules to use up to the respective acceptable bandwidth usages.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the flight information identifies a contingency condition associated with a flight module, and wherein the one or more processors of the payload system are configured to:

based on information associated with the contingency condition, block delivery of data messages associated with the first payload module.

19. The system of claim 17 , wherein the one or more processors of the payload system are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, modify an ability of the first payload module to deliver data messages over a data bus.

20. The system of claim 17 , wherein the one or more processors of the payload system are configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, block delivery of data messages from being sent to, or from, the first payload module.

21. The system of claim 17 , wherein the one or more processors of the payload system are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, restrict the use of a data bus by the first payload module.

22. The system of claim 17 , wherein the one or more processors of the payload system are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, prioritize the use of a data bus by the one or more flight modules over the one or more payload modules.

23. The system of claim 17 , wherein the one or more processors of the payload system are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, store in a data structure, data messages sent to, or from, the first payload module, and provide the data messages to an intended module based on a change in the flight information.

24. The system of claim 17 , wherein determining acceptable data bandwidth usages comprises:

determining the acceptable data bandwidth usage of the one or more payload modules so as not to interfere with bandwidth usage of the one or more flight modules.

25. The system of claim 17 , wherein the one or more processors of the payload system are further configured to at least:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, instruct the first payload module not to place data messages on, or consume bandwidth of, a data bus shared with the one or more flight modules.

26. The system of claim 17 , wherein the one or more processors of the payload system are further configured to:

at least partly in response to the determination of acceptable data bandwidth usages for the one or more payload modules, restrict use of a data transmission radio for data by the one or more payload modules.

27. A method comprising:

obtaining, by a system comprising hardware included in an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and in communication with one or more payload modules, including a first payload module, and one or more flight critical modules included in the UAV, information identifying flight information of the UAV, wherein the flight information comprises flight phase information or a contingency condition associated with a flight critical module;

determining a measure indicating sufficient bandwidth for the flight critical modules; and

maintaining, by the system, sufficient bandwidth for the flight critical modules comprising:

determining, from the determined measure, a respective adjustment to bandwidth usage of, at least, the first payload module, and

causing, at least in part, the first payload module to use the respective adjusted bandwidth usage.

28. The method of claim 27 , wherein a measure indicating sufficient bandwidth is a measure of central tendency of bandwidth usage of the flight critical modules.

29. The method of claim 27 , wherein a measure indicating sufficient bandwidth is a measure of peak bandwidth usage of the flight critical modules.

30. The method of claim 27 , wherein the measure indicating sufficient bandwidth is based on the flight phase information of the UAV indicating a present flight phase comprising take-off, on-station, landing, returning to base, taxiing, or in-flight.

Assignments (11)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 21, 2025
From: HERCULES CAPITAL, INC.
To: SKYDIO, INC.
Reel/Frame 072128/0698 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 21, 2025
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK, A DIVISION OF FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
To: SKYDIO, INC.
Reel/Frame 072107/0066 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 9, 2021
From: SKYDIO, INC.
To: HERCULES CAPITAL, INC., AS COLLATERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 058081/0677 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 8, 2021
From: SKYDIO, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 058053/0768 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2020
From: KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
To: UNMANNED INNOVATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 053739/0789 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 16, 2020
From: KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLC
To: AIRWARE, LLC
Reel/Frame 053234/0634 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE CONVEYING PARTY DATA WAS ERRONEOUSLY ENTER AS UNMMANED INNOVATIONS, INC. IT SHOULD READ UNMANNED INNOVATIONS, INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 053144 FRAME: 0591. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jul 15, 2020
From: UNMANNED INNOVATION, INC.
To: AIRWARE, LLC
Reel/Frame 053210/0586 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2020
From: AIRWARE, LLC
To: SKYDIO, INC.
Reel/Frame 053144/0633 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2020
From: UNMMANED INNOVATION, INC.
To: AIRWARE, LLC
Reel/Frame 053144/0591 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2018
From: UNMANNED INNOVATION, INC.
To: KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
Reel/Frame 048681/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 14, 2016
From: DOWNEY, JONATHAN; MICHINI, BERNARD J.; RICHMAN, BRIAN
To: UNMANNED INNOVATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 038912/0940 →