IP Library Granted Patent US 9,522,527
Granted Patent B2
US 9,522,527 · App. 15/027,155 · Granted Dec 20, 2016

Drop image sensing

Inventors: Stephan R. Clark (Corvallis, OR); Alexander Govyadinov (Corvallis, OR); Jonathan James Mott (Corvallis, OR); Lorraine Theresa Widmann (Corvallis, OR)
Assignee: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
B41J2/04526B41J2/04586B41J2/125B41J2/16579B41J2/16585B41J2/2142B41J2/2146H01L27/14627H01L27/14643B41J2/04561
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,522,527
App. No.
15/027,155
Granted
Dec 20, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A sensor images drops ejected from a printhead nozzle. The sensor has two parallel spaced-apart rows of imaging pixels. In one example, a lens projects an image of a drop ejected from a printhead onto the rows sequentially as the drop travels along a trajectory.

Claims (43)

1. An imaging sensor assembly, comprising:

a two-dimensional imaging sensor having two parallel, spaced-apart rows of imaging pixels, each pixel producing a multilevel signal indicative of an illumination intensity impinging that pixel; and

a lens projecting an image of a drop ejected from a printhead onto the rows sequentially as the drop travels along a trajectory,

wherein the projected image of the drop impinges a plurality of adjacent pixels on a given row, and

wherein a position of the drop along the given row is defined as a centroid of the intensity values for the adjacent pixels.

2. The imaging sensor assembly of claim 1 , wherein the pixels of each row are disposed along that row at a resolution of at least 508 dots per inch.

3. The imaging sensor assembly of claim 1 , wherein

the printhead simultaneously ejects drops from at least two different nozzles of the printhead, and

the lens simultaneously projects an image of each of the drops onto non-overlapping positions along each row.

4. The imaging sensor assembly of claim 3 , wherein an intended trajectory of at least two of the drops are at different distances from each other along an axis orthogonal to a plane of the sensor.

5. The imaging sensor assembly of claim 4 , wherein the at least two of the drops are different substances from each other.

6. The imaging sensor assembly of claim 3 , wherein an intended trajectory of at least two of the drops are at a same distance from a plane of the sensor along an axis orthogonal to the plane of the sensor.

7. The imaging sensor assembly of claim 1 , wherein the lens comprises:

a rear optic having at least two rear lenslets; and

a front optic having at least two front lenslets, each front lenslet corresponding to a different one of the rear lenslets, the front optics stepped such that each front lenslet is spaced at a different distance from its corresponding rear lenslet, the different distances defining a different fixed focal distance for each pair of front and rears lenslets.

8. A printer, comprising:

a carriage spaced apart from a nozzle plane of a printhead controllable to eject drops, the carriage movable parallel to the nozzle plane along at least one linear array of nozzles in the plane;

a sensor on the carriage having two parallel spaced-apart rows of imaging pixels, each row sized to image a plurality of in-flight drops at a given time; and

a controller continuously moving the carriage while ejecting drops from the plurality of nozzles at each of a plurality of times, and calculating a trajectory error for a given nozzle based on illumination intensities for a corresponding drop, the intensities sequentially measured by each of the rows, a lens disposed between the sensor and the ejected drops and structured with a field of view that simultaneously images drops from a plurality of spaced-apart ones of the nozzles of a given linear nozzle array onto different positions within a single corresponding region of the sensor,

wherein the nozzle plane comprises at least two linear nozzle arrays in parallel, and wherein the lens comprises:

at least two lenslet pairs structured to each have a different focal distance, where each focal distance corresponds to a distance from the sensor to the ejected drops of a different one of the linear arrays.

9. The printer of claim 8 , wherein each lenslet pair simultaneously images multiple drops from each different linear nozzle array onto a different corresponding region of the sensor.

10. The printer of claim 8 , wherein the controller calculates the trajectory error of all nozzles of non-end portions of the printhead in a single pass of the carriage relative to the printhead.

11. The printer of claim 8 wherein, for each linear array of nozzles, the controller determines the plural nozzles and the plural times according to a skip pattern which prevents overlap of multiple drop images on the sensor during carnage motion.

12. The printer of claim 8 , comprising:

a light source disposed on the carriage at a position which continuously illuminates all drops ejected at each plural time while the drops are within a field of view of the sensor.

13. The printer of claim 8 , wherein

the nozzle plane of the printhead simultaneously ejects drops from at least two different nozzles, and

the lens simultaneously projects an image of each of the drops onto non-overlapping positions along each row of imaging pixels.

14. printer 13 , wherein an intended trajectory of at least two of the drops are at different distances from each other along an axis orthogonal to a plane of the sensor.

15. The printer of claim 14 , wherein the at least two of the drops are different substances from each other.

16. A method of measuring nozzle drop health in a printer having a two-dimensional arrangement of parallel linear arrays of printhead nozzles, comprising:

simultaneously ejecting drops from number N of spaced-apart nozzles of each of the linear arrays;

simultaneously imaging the drops from the N nozzles of each of the linear arrays with a sensor having two parallel, spaced-apart rows of pixels, each imaged drop producing illumination intensities at a range of pixel positions along each row; and

calculating a trajectory error for each nozzle based on the illumination intensities and the pixel positions for the corresponding drop, wherein the value of N ensures that the imaged drops do not overlap on the sensor when the sensor is continuously advanced at an associated velocity V.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the N nozzles are equally spaced apart at an interval of 2*N+1 nozzle positions, the method further comprising:

while performing the simultaneous ejecting, continuously advancing the sensor along the length of the plural linear arrays by a distance corresponding to N nozzle positions;

offsetting he N nozzles at an interval of the N nozzle positions in the direction of advancing; and

repeating the simultaneous ejecting using the N offset nozzles.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the calculating comprises:

determining a drop position along a row as a centroid of illumination intensities of the imaged drop at the pixel positions along the row which correspond to the imaged drop; and

calculating the trajectory error for the corresponding nozzle based on a, difference in the drop positions along the two rows.

19. The method of claim 16 , wherein the ejecting comprises: ejecting a burst of up to 8 drops from a nozzle.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 2, 2016
From: CLARK, STEPHAN RICHARD; GOVYADINOV, ALEXANDER N; MOTT, JONATHAN JAMES; WIDMANN, LORRAINE THERESA
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 040195/0981 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20160250848A1 · Sep 1, 2016