IP Library Granted Patent US 10,237,287
Granted Patent B1
US 10,237,287 · App. 15/042,127 · Granted Mar 19, 2019

System and method for detecting a malicious activity in a computing environment

Inventors: Keith Amidon (Los Altos, CA); Michael Callahan (Palo Alto, CA); Debabrata Dash (San Jose, CA); Gary Golomb (Los Gatos, CA)
Assignee: Awake Security, Inc.
H04L63/1416H04L63/1433
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,237,287
App. No.
15/042,127
Granted
Mar 19, 2019
Kind
B1
Abstract

System and method for detecting a likely threat from a malicious attack is disclosed. Communication between a user computer and a destination computer is monitored by a security appliance. Selective information from the communication is extracted. One or more weak signals of a threat is detected based on the selective information. One or more weak signals are evaluated for a likely threat based on a threshold value. A corrective action is initiated for the likely threat, based on the evaluation.

Claims (31)

1. A method for detecting a likely threat from a malicious attack, comprising:

monitoring a communication between a user computer and at least one destination computer by a security appliance;

extracting selective information from the communication by the security appliance;

detecting one or more weak signals of a likely malware threat based on the extracted selective information from the communication, by the security appliance;

evaluating one or more weak signals for the likely malware threat based on a threshold value by the security appliance; and

initiating a corrective action for the likely malware threat based on the evaluation of the one or more weak signals for the likely malware threat by the security appliance.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein, the malicious attack by the malware has a plurality of phases.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein, at least more than one weak signal for the likely malware threat is detected in at least one of the plurality of phases of the malicious attack by the malware.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein, communication between the user computer and at least one destination computer is in a single session and one or more weak signals for the likely malware threat are detected in the single session.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein one or more weak signals for the likely malware threat are detected in at least two of the phases of the malicious attack by the malware in the single session.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein one of the destination computer is a compromised server and another one of the destination computer is a command and control server for the malware.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein a priority of a likely malware threat is increased if the command and control server domain registration based on a domain reputation.

8. The method of claim 4 , wherein communication between the user computer and at least one destination computer in prior one or more sessions is evaluated for indication of weak signals for the malware threat and if weak signals for the malware threat are indicated, a priority of a likely threat is increased.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein number of communications between the user computer and a command and control server for the malware is compared to a threshold value, and if the number of communications is below a threshold value, a priority of a likely threat is increased.

10. A system to detect a likely threat of a malware attack, comprising:

a security appliance configured to

monitor a communication between a user computer and a destination computer;

extract selective information from the communication;

detect one or more weak signals of a likely malware threat based on the extracted selective information from the communication;

evaluate one or more weak signals for the likely malware threat based on a threshold value; and

initiate a corrective action for the likely malware threat based on the evaluation of the one or more weak signals for the likely malware threat.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein, the malicious attack by the malware has a plurality of phases.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein, at least more than one weak signal of the likely malware threat is detected in at least one of the plurality of phases of the malicious attack by the malware.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein, communication between the user computer and at least one destination computer is in a single session and one or more weak signals of the likely malware threat are detected in the single session.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein one or more weak signals of the likely malware threat are detected in at least two of the phases in the single session.

15. The system of claim 10 , wherein one of the destination computer is a compromised server and another one of the destination computer is a command and control server of the malware.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein a priority of a likely malware threat is increased if the command and control server domain registration is based on a domain reputation.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein communication between the user computer and at least one destination computer in prior one or more sessions is evaluated for indication of weak signals of the likely malware threat and if weak signals of the likely malware threat are indicated, a priority of the likely malware threat is increased.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein number of communications between the user computer and a command and control server of the malware is compared to a threshold value, and if the number of communications is below a threshold value, the priority of a likely malware threat is increased.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein one of the weak signals of the malware threat is based on the selective information of the communication indicative of a file size.

20. The system of claim 1 , wherein one of the weak signals of the malware threat is based on the selective information of the communication indicative of a file size.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2024
From: AWAKE SECURITY LLC
To: ARISTA NETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 066165/0924 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 23, 2020
From: AWAKE SECURITY, INC.
To: AWAKE SECURITY LLC
Reel/Frame 054500/0373 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 31, 2019
From: AWAKE NETWORKS, INC.
To: AWAKE SECURITY, INC.
Reel/Frame 048208/0423 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2016
From: AMIDON, KEITH; CALLAHAN, MICHAEL; DASH, DEBABRATA; GOLOMB, GARY
To: AWAKE NETWORKS, INC,
Reel/Frame 037720/0808 →
Cited By (1)
US 12,634,300