IP Library Granted Patent US 10,194,857
Granted Patent B2
US 10,194,857 · App. 15/116,277 · Granted Feb 5, 2019

Reverse dual positive airway pressure challenges for breathing disorder diagnostics

Inventors: Michael Edward Colbaugh (Level Grenn, PA); Lauren Elizabeth Hueser (Brighton, MA); Surya Subrahmanya Sreeram Vissapragada Venkata Satya (Monroeville, PA)
Assignee: Koninklijke Philips N.V.
A61B5/4836A61B5/087A61B5/0816A61B5/4818A61B5/7264A61B5/7278A61M16/0057A61M16/0066A61M16/024A61M16/0465A61M16/0666A61M16/1075A61M16/16A61B5/082A61M16/109A61M16/161A61M16/201A61M2016/0036A61M2205/3358A61M2205/3375A61M2205/50A61M2205/505A61M2205/52A61M2205/581A61M2205/583A61M2230/40A61M2230/50A61M2230/63
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,194,857
App. No.
15/116,277
Granted
Feb 5, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for classifying breathing disorders of subjects are based on the respiratory response to a change in a pressure level of a pressurized flow of breathable gas. The change presents a breathing challenge to a subject. The challenge may be limited to the inspiratory breathing phase. The inspiratory pressure level may be lower than the expiratory pressure level during challenges.

Claims (60)

1. A pressure support system configured to provide pressure support to an airway of a subject, the system comprising:

a pressure generator configured to provide a pressurized flow of breathable gas at a pressure level to the airway of the subject;

a subject interface configured to conduct the pressurized flow of breathable gas to the airway of the subject, the subject interface including an interface appliance configured to removably engage the airway of the subject;

one or more sensors in fluid communication with the subject interface and configured to generate output signals conveying information related to breathing of the subject; and

one or more physical processors configured to:

receive a recommended inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) level and a recommended expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) level;

control the pressure generator based on the output signals to generate the pressurized flow such that the pressure level of the pressurized flow corresponds to the recommended IPAP level during inspirations of the subject and the pressure level of the pressurized flow corresponds to the recommended EPAP level during expirations of the subject;

control the pressure generator to repeatedly reduce the pressure level of the pressurized flow with respect to the recommended IPAP level during inspiration for one or more breathing cycles until the output signals indicate airway instability of the subject;

determine a reduced amount of the pressure level resulting from the repeated reduction that caused the airway instability based on the generated output signals during the one or more breathing cycles;

control the pressure generator to repeatedly increase the pressure level of the pressurized flow with respect to the recommended EPAP level during expirations for one or more breathing cycles;

determine whether stability of the airway has been restored based on the generated output signals; and

determine a classification of a breathing disorder of the subject based on (1) the reduced amount of the pressure level that caused the airway instability and (2) an amount the pressure level is increased during expirations to restore the stability of the airway.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more physical processors are configured such that the repeated reducing comprises:

reducing the pressure level during a first inspiration to a first reduced level and during a second inspiration to a second reduced level, wherein the second inspiration is subsequent to the first inspiration, determining a first breathing parameter during the first inspiration and a second breathing parameter during the second inspiration, and determining a difference between the first breathing parameter and the second breathing parameter, and wherein the classification is further based on the determined difference.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more physical processors are further configured to:

determine a first inspiratory flow rate during one or more inspirations that have the recommended IPAP level,

determine a second inspiratory flow rate during the one or more breathing cycles with the reduced pressure level, and

further determine the classification of the breathing disorder of the subject based on a change between the first inspiratory flow rate and the second inspiratory flow rate.

4. A method for providing pressure support to an airway of a subject, the method being implemented using a pressure generator that provides a pressurized flow of breathable gas at a pressure level to an airway of the subject, a subject interface, one or more sensors in fluid communication with the subject interface, and one or more physical processors, the method comprising:

generating, with the pressure generator, a pressurized flow of breathable gas at a pressure level for delivery to the airway of the subject;

conducting, with the subject interface, the pressurized flow of breathable gas to the airway of the subject, the subject interface including an interface appliance configured to removably engage the airway of the subject;

generating, by the one or more sensors, output signals conveying information related to breathing of the subject;

receiving, with the one or more physical processors, a recommended inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) level and a recommended expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) level;

controlling, with the one or more physical processors, the pressure generator based on the output signals to generate the pressurized flow of breathable gas such that the pressure level of the pressurized flow corresponds to the recommended IPAP level during inspirations of the subject and the pressure level of the pressurized flow corresponds to the recommended EPAP level during expirations of the subject;

repeatedly reducing, by controlling the pressure generator with the one or more physical processors, the pressure level of the pressurized flow with respect to the recommended IPAP level during inspiration for one or more breathing cycles until the output signals indicate airway instability of the subject;

determining, with the one or more physical processors, a reduced amount of the pressure level resulting from the repeated reduction;

repeatedly increasing, by controlling the pressure generator with the one or more physical processors, the pressure level of the pressurized flow with respect to the recommended EPAP level during expirations for one or more breathing cycles;

determining, with the one or more physical processors, whether stability of the airway has been restored based on the generated output signals; and

determining, with the one or more physical processors, a classification of a breathing disorder of the subject based on (1) the reduced amount of the pressure level that caused the airway instability and (2) an amount the pressure level is increased during expirations to restore the stability of the airway.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein repeatedly reducing the pressure includes:

reducing the pressure level during a first inspiration to a first reduced level;

reducing the pressure level during a second inspiration to a second reduced level, wherein the second inspiration is subsequent to the first inspiration,

determining a first breathing parameter during the first inspiration;

determining a second breathing parameter during the second inspiration; and

determining a difference between the first breathing parameter and the second breathing parameter;

and wherein determining the classification is further based on the difference between the first breathing parameter and the second breathing parameter.

6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

determining, with the one or more physical processors, a first inspiratory flow rate during one or more inspirations that have the recommended IPAP level,

determining, with the one or more physical processors, a second inspiratory flow rate during the one or more breathing cycles with the reduced pressure level, and

further determining the classification of the breathing disorder of the subject based on a change in between the first inspiratory flow rate and the second inspiratory flow rate.

7. A pressure support system configured to provide pressure support to an airway of a subject, the system comprising:

a pressure generator configured to provide a pressurized flow of breathable gas at a pressure level to the airway of the subject;

a subject interface configured to conduct the pressurized flow of breathable gas to the airway of the subject, the subject interface including an interface appliance configured to removably engage the airway of the subject;

one or more sensors in fluid communication with the subject interface and configured to generate output signals conveying information related to breathing of the subject; and

one or more physical processors configured to:

control the pressure generator based on the output signals to generate the pressurized flow at an inspiration pressure level during inspirations of the subject and at an expiration pressure level during expirations of the subject;

control the pressure generator to repeatedly reduce the pressure level of the pressurized flow from the inspiration pressure level during successive inspirations of the subject, until the output signals indicate airway instability of the subject;

determine, based on the output signals, a reduced amount of the pressure level resulting from the repeated reduction that caused the airway instability;

control the pressure generator to repeatedly increase the pressure level of the pressurized flow from the expiration pressure level during successive expirations of the subject;

determine whether stability of the airway has been restored based on the generated output signals; and

determine a classification of a breathing disorder of the subject based on (1) the reduced amount of the pressure level that caused the airway instability and (2) an amount the pressure level is increased during expirations to restore the stability of the airway.

8. The pressure support system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more physical processors are further configured to:

determine a first inspiratory flow rate during a first inspiration of the subject;

determine a second inspiratory flow rate during a second inspiration of the subject, the pressure level of the pressurized flow of breathable gas being lower during the second inspiration relative to the first inspiration, and

further determine the classification of the breathing disorder of the subject based on a difference between the first inspiratory flow rate and the second inspiratory flow rate.

9. The pressure support system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more physical processors are configured such that the difference between the first inspiratory flow rate and the second inspiratory flow rate is a difference in a shape of an inspiratory flow rate curve for the second inspiration of the subject relative to the first inspiration of the subject.

10. The pressure support system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more physical processors are further configured to:

determine a delay parameter that indicates a delay between an onset of a given inspiration of the subject and a change in an inspiratory flow rate that corresponds to the onset of the given inspiration of the subject; and

further determine the classification of the breathing disorder of the subject based on the delay parameter.

11. The pressure support system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more physical processors are configured such that the onset of the given inspiration occurs at a moment in time when an immediately previous exhalation of the subject ends, and wherein the change in the inspiratory flow rate occurs subsequent to the end of the immediately previous inspiration.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2016
From: COLBAUGH, MICHAEL EDWARD; HUESER, LAUREN ELIZABETH; VISSAPRAGADA VENKATA SATYA, SURYA SUBRAHMANYA SREERAM
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 039326/0009 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61941631 · Feb 19, 2014
Related Publication 20170007174A1 · Jan 12, 2017