IP Library Granted Patent US 10,506,951
Granted Patent B2
US 10,506,951 · App. 15/173,157 · Granted Dec 17, 2019

Joint play quantification and analysis

Inventors: Thomas P. Branch (Atlanta, GA); Shaun K. Stinton (Chamblee, GA); Edward Dittmar (Marietta, GA); Nathaniel K. deJarnette (Lilburn, GA); T. Christopher Madden (Atlanta, GA)
Assignee: RoboDiagnostics LLC
A61B5/1121A61B5/1036A61B5/1127A61B5/4528A61B5/4585A61B90/06A61B5/4533A61B5/702A61B2090/067A61H1/024
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,506,951
App. No.
15/173,157
Granted
Dec 17, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes obtaining rotational data and translational data for a joint, the rotational and translational data being indicative of rotational and translational movement of the joint during rotational and translational joint testing, respectively, the rotational and translational joint testing being implemented by a robotic testing apparatus applied to the joint. A quantity indicative of joint play of the joint is computed. The quantity is computed via a function of the rotational data and the translational data. The method includes determining whether the computed quantity exceeds a joint play threshold and, if the computed quantity exceeds the joint play threshold, comparing the rotational data and the translational data with preset rotational data and preset translational data for the rotational and translation joint testing, respectively.

Claims (48)

1. A method of evaluating a joint, the method comprising:

obtaining, by a processor, rotational data and translational data captured via a robotic testing apparatus for the joint, the rotational and translational data being indicative of rotational and translational movement of the joint, respectively, during rotational and translational joint testing, the rotational and translational joint testing being implemented by the robotic testing apparatus applied to the joint, the robotic testing apparatus comprising a plurality of motors for the rotational and translational joint testing, the rotational data and the translational data being indicative of one or more rotational ranges of motion and one or more translational ranges of motion, respectively, for the rotational and translational joint testing;

computing, by the processor, a quantity indicative of a joint play volume of the joint, the quantity being computed via a function, the function comprising a multiplication of the one or more rotational ranges of motion and the one or more translational ranges of motion for the rotational data and the translational data;

determining, by the processor, whether the joint has an abnormality by determining whether the computed quantity exceeds a joint play volume threshold;

if the computed quantity exceeds the joint play volume threshold, comparing, by the processor, the rotational data and the translational data with preset rotational data and preset translational data for the rotational and translation joint testing, respectively, to identify the abnormality of the joint; and

wherein determining that the joint has an abnormality based on the computed quantity is a prerequisite to identifying the abnormality, such that comparing the rotational data and the translational data with the preset rotational data and the preset translational data is implemented after determining that the computed quantity exceeds the joint play volume threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

compiling a profile of the joint indicative of results of comparing the rotational and the translational data with the preset rotational and translational data; and

assessing the profile to identify the abnormality of the joint.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein compiling the profile comprises incorporating the computed quantity into the profile.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein compiling the profile comprises incorporating data indicative of structural characteristics of bones defining the joint.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein compiling the profile comprises incorporating data indicative of three-dimensional surfaces of bones defining the joint.

6. The method of claim 2 , wherein compiling the profile comprises incorporating data indicative of contact points between bones defining the joint.

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein assessing the profile comprises:

accessing a data store in which profile data for abnormal joints is stored; and

comparing the profile with the profile data.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the preset rotational data and the preset translational data are indicative of rotational and translational ranges of motion, respectively, for the rotational and translational joint testing.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the rotational and translational ranges of motion are indicative of boundaries between normal joints and abnormal joints.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the joint is a knee, and wherein the rotational movement comprises varus-valgus rotational movement of the knee.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the rotational movement further comprises external-internal rotational movement of the knee.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the preset rotational data and the preset translational data comprise respective distribution datasets.

13. A system for evaluating a joint, the system comprising:

a memory in which input instructions, quantification instructions, and analysis instructions are stored; and

a processor coupled to the memory and configured through execution of the input instructions to obtain rotational data and translational data captured via a robotic testing apparatus for the joint, the rotational and translational data being indicative of ranges of rotational and translational motion of the joint, respectively, during rotational and translational joint testing, the rotational and translational joint testing being implemented by the robotic testing apparatus applied to the joint, the robotic testing apparatus comprising a plurality of motors for the rotational and translational joint testing, the rotational data and the translational data being indicative of one or more rotational ranges of motion and one or more translational ranges of motion, respectively, for the rotational and translational joint testing;

wherein the processor is configured through execution of the quantification instructions to compute a quantity synthetically indicative of a joint play volume of the joint via synthesis of the rotational data and the translational data, the synthesis comprising a multiplication of the one or more rotational ranges of motion and the one or more translational ranges of motion for the rotational data and the translational data,

wherein the processor is configured through execution of the analysis instructions to determine whether the joint has an abnormality by determining whether the computed quantity exceeds a joint play volume threshold,

wherein the processor is configured through execution of the analysis instructions, if the computed quantity exceeds the joint play volume threshold, to compare the rotational data and the translational data with rotational and translational thresholds for the rotational and translational joint testing, respectively, to identify the abnormality of the joint, and

wherein a determination that the joint has an abnormality based on the computed quantity is a prerequisite to identifying the abnormality, such that a comparison of the rotational data and the translational data with the rotational and translational thresholds is implemented after the determination that the computed quantity exceeds the joint play volume threshold.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is configured through execution of the analysis instructions to:

compile a profile of the joint indicative of results of comparing the rotational data and the translational data with the rotational and translational thresholds; and

assess the profile to identify the abnormality of the joint.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the processor is configured through execution of the analysis instructions to incorporate the computed quantity into the profile.

16. The system of claim 14 , wherein the processor is configured through execution of the analysis instructions to:

access the memory to obtain profile data for abnormal joints; and

compare the profile with the profile data.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein the joint is a knee, and wherein the rotational movement motion comprises varus-valgus rotational movement of the knee.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the rotational motion further comprises external-internal rotational movement of the knee.

19. A system for evaluating a joint, the system comprising:

a robot testing apparatus configured to implement rotational joint testing and translational joint testing of the joint and further configured to detect one or more ranges of rotational motion and one or more ranges of translational motion for the joint, the robotic testing apparatus comprising a plurality of motors for the rotational and translational joint testing;

a memory in which input instructions, quantification instructions, and analysis instructions are stored; and

a processor in communication with the robot testing apparatus and coupled to the memory;

wherein the processor is configured through execution of the input instructions to obtain, via the robot testing apparatus, rotational data indicative of the one or more ranges of rotational motion and translational data indicative of the one or more ranges of translational motion,

wherein the processor is configured through execution of the quantification instructions to compute a quantity indicative of a joint play volume of the joint, the quantity being computed via a function, the function comprising a multiplication of the one or more rotational ranges of motion and the one or more translational ranges of motion for the rotational data and the translational data,

wherein the processor is configured through execution of the analysis instructions to determine whether the joint has an abnormality by determining whether the computed quantity exceeds a joint play volume threshold,

wherein the processor is further configured through execution of the analysis instructions, if the computed quantity exceeds the joint play threshold, to compare the rotational data and the translational data with rotational and translational thresholds for the rotational and translational joint testing, respectively, to identify the abnormality of the joint, and

wherein a determination that the joint has an abnormality based on the computed quantity is a prerequisite to identifying the abnormality, such that a comparison of the rotational data and the translational data with the rotational and translational thresholds is implemented after the determination that the computed quantity exceeds the joint play threshold.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein the joint is a knee, and wherein the rotational motion comprises varus-valgus rotational movement of the knee.

21. The system of claim 20 , wherein the rotational motion further comprises external-internal rotational movement of the knee.

Assignments (5)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 041035 FRAME: 0231. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Oct 29, 2020
From: ERMI LLC
To: ROBODIAGNOSTICS LLC
Reel/Frame 054249/0450 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 13, 2019
From: ERMI, INC.
To: ERMI LLC
Reel/Frame 050993/0986 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PATENT NO. 9983693 AND ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 049038 FRAME 0759. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Nov 13, 2019
From: ERMI LLC
To: ROBODIAGNOSITCS LLC
Reel/Frame 051035/0231 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 30, 2019
From: ERMI LLC
To: ROBODIAGNOSITCS LLC
Reel/Frame 049038/0759 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2016
From: BRANCH, THOMAS P.; STINTON, SHAUN K.; DITTMAR, EDWARD; DEJARNETTE, NATHANIEL K.; MADDEN, T. CHRISTOPHER
To: ERMI, INC.
Reel/Frame 040148/0051 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20170347924A1 · Dec 7, 2017