Emergency stopping for autonomous commercial vehicles
The present disclosure generally relates to autonomous commercial vehicles. In one aspect, the disclosure provides a method for controlling a commercial highway vehicle. The method includes detecting a failure of a first component based on a first signal from a first sensor. The method also includes classifying, by an automated driving system on the vehicle, a severity of the component failure. The method further includes determining to stop the vehicle if the severity exceeds a threshold severity level. The method also includes determining an emergency stopping distance based on the severity and a current momentum of the vehicle. The method further includes determining a stopping location within the emergency stopping distance. The method also includes stopping the vehicle at the stopping location. The present disclosure also provides an autonomous commercial vehicle and an emergency control system for performing the method.
1. A method for controlling an autonomous commercial highways vehicle, comprising:
detecting a failure of a first component based on a first signal;
classifying, by an automated driving system on the vehicle, a severity of the failure of the first component;
determining to stop the vehicle, by the automated driving system on the vehicle, if the severity of the failure of the first component exceeds a threshold severity level;
determining an emergency stopping distance, by the automated driving system on the vehicle, based on the severity of the failure of the first component, a current momentum of the vehicle, and an effect of the failure of the first component on a maximum coasting distance;
determining, by the automated driving system on the vehicle, a stopping location within the emergency stopping distance; and
stopping the vehicle, by the automated driving system on the vehicle, at the stopping location.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising confirming the failure of the first component based on a change in a second signal.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein confirming the failure of the first component comprises determining that the change in the second signal is correlated to a change of the first signal associated with the failure.
4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the first signal is from a first sensor and the second signal is from a different, second sensor.
5. The method of claim 4 , wherein confirming the failure of the first component comprises:
inferring, based on an inference rule associated with the failure of the first component, an expected change of the second sensor; and
determining, based on the second signal, that the expected change has occurred.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the emergency stopping distance based on the severity and the current momentum of the vehicle comprises determining an effect of the failure of the first component on a minimum stopping distance.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the emergency stopping distance based on the severity and the current momentum of the vehicle comprises determining the maximum coasting distance of the vehicle without further energy provided by an engine of the vehicle.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein stopping the vehicle at the stopping location comprises:
determining a route between a current vehicle position and the stopping location based on at least one of a vision system, radar system, or lidar system;
determining that the route is clear of obstacles; and
controlling a steering system and a braking system of the vehicle to follow the route.
9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising defueling an engine of the vehicle before controlling the steering system and the braking system.
10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising shifting a transmission of the vehicle into a lower gear than a current gear or into a neutral gear before controlling the steering system and the braking system.
11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the stopping location is off of a designated highway lane and wherein determining the route comprises determining to leave the designated highway lane.
12. An emergency control system for an autonomous commercial highway vehicle, comprising:
a memory; and
a processor communicatively coupled to the memory and configured to:
detect a failure of a first component based on a first signal from a first, sensor of a plurality of sensors that each monitor a respective component of the vehicle;
classify a severity of the failure of the first component;
determine to stop the vehicle if the seventy of the failure of the first component exceeds a threshold severity level;
determine an emergency stopping distance, based on the severity of the failure of the first component, a current momentum of the vehicle, and an effect of the failure of the first component on a maximum coasting distance;
determine a stopping location within the emergency stopping distance; and
control one or more vehicle components to stop the vehicle at the stopping location.
13. The emergency control system of claim 12 , wherein the processor is configured to confirm the failure of the first component based on a change in a second signal from a second sensor of the plurality of sensors.
14. The emergency control system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is configured to determine that the change in the second signal is correlated to a change of the first signal associated with the failure.
15. The emergency control system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is configured to:
infer, based on an inference rule associated with the failure of the first component, an expected change of the second sensor; and
determine, based on the change in the second signal, that the expected change has occurred.
16. The emergency control system of claim 12 , wherein the processor is configured to:
determine a route between a current vehicle position and the stopping location based on at least one of a vision system, radar system, or lidar system;
determine that the route is clear of obstacles; and
control a steering system and a braking system of the vehicle to follow the route.
17. The emergency control system of claim 16 , wherein the stopping location is off of a designated highway lane and wherein the processor is configured to determine a route that leaves the designated highway lane.
18. The emergency control system of claim 16 , wherein the processor is configured to determine the emergency stopping distance based on the severity and the current momentum of the vehicle by:
determining an effect of the failure of the first component on a minimum stopping distance;
and
determining a coasting distance of the vehicle without further energy provided by an engine of the vehicle.
19. An autonomous commercial highway vehicle, comprising:
a plurality of sensors that each monitor a respective component of the vehicle;
a data bus that carries signals reported from the plurality of sensors;
a memory; and
a processor communicatively coupled to the data bus and the memory and configured to:
detect, via the data bus, a failure of a first component based on a first signal;
classify a severity of the failure of the first component;
determine to stop the vehicle if the severity of the failure of the first component exceeds a threshold severity level;
determine an emergency stopping distance based on the severity of the failure of the first component, a current momentum of the vehicle, and a maximum coasting distance of the vehicle without further energy provided by an engine of the vehicle;
determine a stopping location within the emergency stopping distance; and
control one or more vehicle components to stop the vehicle at the stopping location.