IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,043,288
Granted Patent B2
US 10,043,288 · App. 15/334,219 · Granted Aug 7, 2018

Methods for monitoring combustion process equipment

Inventors: Kurt Kraus (Tulsa, OK); Matthew Martin (Tulsa, OK); James W. Harris (Aurora, IL); Robert James Rose (Cary, IL)
Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
G06T7/60G01F1/76G06T15/08G06T2207/10012
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,043,288
App. No.
15/334,219
Granted
Aug 7, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

Example methods provided herein generate and employ three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed images of process equipment or areas within various environments in which combustion processes take places. These three-dimensional images are generated with data provided from imaging devices. The imaging devices are disposed or positioned at multiple vantage points, and in various ways, to monitor process equipment in the environment.

Claims (9)

1. A method for detecting a flaring event within an environment, the method comprising:

acquiring images of a flare from a plurality of image capturing devices disposed or positioned at a plurality of vantage points within the environment;

generating a three-dimensional reconstructed image of the flare using said acquired images; and

comparing the three-dimensional reconstructed image to a set of three-dimensional images to detect the flaring event wherein said comparing comprises:

determining a similarity or difference between the three-dimensional reconstructed image and each of the set of three-dimensional images;

determining whether the similarity or difference meets a predetermined threshold; and uses one or more of wavelet comparison, scale variance, differencing, coefficients of radial basis function comparisons, or Fourier transform coefficient comparisons.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the set of three-dimensional images represents an optimal or a sub-optimal flare tip pattern.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of three-dimensional images are stored within a database accessible by a monitoring unit.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising if the flaring event is detected, generating an alert.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 21, 2017
From: KRAUS, KURT; MARTIN, MATTHEW; HARRIS, JAMES W.; ROSE, ROBERT JAMES
To: UOP LLC
Reel/Frame 041316/0802 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62253375 · Nov 10, 2015
Related Publication 20170148184A1 · May 25, 2017
Cited By (1)
US 12,241,790