IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,934,267
Granted Patent B2
US 9,934,267 · App. 15/350,206 · Granted Apr 3, 2018

Dynamic master data management

Inventors: Dmitriy Drinfeld (Richmond Hill, CA); Stephanie J. Hazlewood (Toronto, CA)
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
G06F17/30371G06F17/30377
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,934,267
App. No.
15/350,206
Granted
Apr 3, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method includes, in a master data management system, receiving a persistent modification request affecting a master data attribute, determining that no preexisting master record exists in the master data management system for the master data attribute, and, responsive to determining that no preexisting master record exists for the master data attribute, adding a new master data attribute and associated new ownership information for the master data attribute to the master data management system, based on the persistent modification request. A corresponding computer program product and computer system are also disclosed.

Claims (28)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising, in a master data management system:

receiving a persistent modification request affecting a master data attribute;

said persistent modification request being received through a physical application programming interface

responsive to determining that a preexisting master record exists in said master data management system for said master data attribute that identifies virtual ownership of said master data attribute, denying said persistent modification request as to said master data attribute.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

said persistent modification request is part of a transaction on said master data management system;

and, further comprising:

responsive to denying said persistent modification request, rolling back said transaction.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

responsive to determining that no preexisting master record exists for said master data attribute, adding a new master data attribute and associated new ownership information for said master data attribute to said master data management system, based on said persistent modification request.

4. A computer-implemented method comprising, in a master data management system:

receiving a persistent modification request affecting a master data attribute;

said persistent modification request being received through a physical application programming interface;

responsive to determining that a preexisting master record exists in said master data management system for said master data attribute that identifies central ownership of said master data attribute, allowing said persistent modification request.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein:

said persistent modification request is part of a transaction on said master data management system;

and, further comprising:

responsive to allowing said persistent modification request, rolling back said transaction.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising:

responsive to determining that no preexisting master record exists for said master data attribute, adding a new master data attribute and associated new ownership information for said master data attribute to said master data management system, based on said persistent modification request.

7. A computer-implemented method comprising, in a master data management system:

receiving a persistent modification request affecting a master data attribute;

determining that a preexisting master record exists in said master data management system for said master data attribute that identifies central ownership of said master data attribute;

detecting a conflict between said persistent modification request and said master data attribute based on said master data attribute having central ownership; and

responsive to detecting said conflict, generating a stewardship event.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein generating a stewardship event comprises at least one stewardship action selected from the group consisting of:

(a) sending a task notification to a stewardship entity; and

(b) reconciling said conflict according to one or more business rules.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 14, 2016
From: DRINFELD, DMITRIY; HAZLEWOOD, STEPHANIE J.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 040305/0119 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15186893 · Jun 20, 2016
Continuation 14972137 · Dec 17, 2015
Related Publication 20170177654A1 · Jun 22, 2017