IP Library Granted Patent US 11,259,753
Granted Patent B2
US 11,259,753 · App. 15/368,510 · Granted Mar 1, 2022

Systems and methods for detecting photoplethysmographic device usage

Inventors: Elad Ferber (Woodside, CA); Pierre-Jean Cobut (Menlo Park, CA); Ramkrishnan Narayanan (San Jose, CA); Derya Gol Gungor (Sunnyvale, CA)
Assignee: Itamar Medical SPRY 2-21, Limited Partnership
A61B5/7221A61B5/0002A61B5/0008A61B5/0022A61B5/0064A61B5/021A61B5/024A61B5/0205A61B5/02125A61B5/02141A61B5/02416A61B5/0806A61B5/0816A61B5/117A61B5/1455A61B5/14532A61B5/14535A61B5/14539A61B5/14546A61B5/14551A61B5/4872A61B5/6802A61B5/6816A61B5/6823A61B5/6824A61B5/6829A61B5/721A61B5/7203A61B5/7264A61B5/7267A61B5/7275A61B5/7278A61B5/7435G16H40/67
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,259,753
App. No.
15/368,510
Granted
Mar 1, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for determining if a wearable photoplethysmography device is correctly positioned in operating to medical signs of a user by using a classifier to determine if a signal is valid or invalid. In some embodiments, in using the classifier to determine in a signal is valid or invalid, a lean method of linear computational complexity and minimal memory complexity is provided for determining at the wearable photoplethysmography device if it is correctly positioned. In some embodiments, in using the classifier minimal computational complexity is used in determining at the wearable photoplethysmography device if it is correctly positioned.

Claims (21)

1. A method comprising:

generating a signal from an energy receiver of a wearable photoplethysmography device, the signal generated by the energy receiver, at least in part, being based upon at least a portion of energy that was initially projected by an energy transmitter of the wearable photoplethysmography device operating to measure medical signs of a user;

selecting a subset of wave features of a plurality of wave features of the signal;

determining wave metric calculations of a set of wave metric calculations for the subset of wave features;

classifying the signal by applying a validity classifier to at least one of the wave metric calculations to generate a validity score, the validity classifier generated based on the set of wave metric calculations and used to determine if the wearable photoplethysmography device is correctly positioned on the user;

comparing the validity score to a validity threshold to determine if the wearable photoplethysmography device is correctly positioned;

controlling operation of the wearable photoplethysmography device based on whether it is determined the wearable photoplethysmography device is correctly positioned based on a comparison of the validity score to the validity threshold;

classifying the signal by applying the validity classifier to the wave metric calculations of the set of wave metric calculations to generate a plurality of validity scores including the validity score for the signal;

applying temporal smoothing to the plurality of validity scores for the signal to generate a smoothed validity score;

comparing the smoothed validity score to the validity threshold to determine if the wearable photoplethysmography device is correctly positioned in operating to measure the medical signs of the user; and

controlling operation of the wearable photoplethysmography device based on whether it is determined the wearable photoplethysmography device is correctly positioned in operating to measure the medical signs of the user based on a comparison of the smoothed validity score to the validity threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the wave metric calculations of the set of wave metric calculations include signal energy measurements of the signal determined from the subset of wave features.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the wave metric calculations of the set of wave metric calculations include signal mobility measurements of the signal determined from the subset of wave features and the signal energy measurements of the signal determined from the subset of wave features.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the wave metric calculations of the set of wave metric calculations include signal complexity measurements of the signal determined from the subset of wave features and the signal mobility of the measurements of the signal determined from the subset of wave features.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the wave metric calculations of the set of wave metric calculations include one or a combination of signal crossing measurements of the signal and signal non-oscillatory component measurements of the signal determined from the subset of wave features.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the validity classifier is generated from one or a combination of signal energy measurements, signal mobility measurements, signal complexity measurements, signal crossing measurements, and signal non-oscillatory component measurements of signals known to be valid or invalid by being generated by at least one wearable photoplethysmography device correctly positioned in operating to measure the medical signs and at least another wearable photoplethysmography device incorrectly positioned in operating to measure the medical signs.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the wearable photoplethysmography device is operating to measure the medical signs of the user based on the comparison of the validity score to the validity threshold;

causing the energy transmitter to stop operating in emitting energy for use by the wearable photoplethysmography device in operating to measure the medical signs of the user.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the temporal smoothing includes applying rank smoothing to the plurality of validity scores, the smoothed validity score selected from the plurality of validity scores based on the value of the smoothed validity score according to the rank smoothing.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising normalizing the signal before selecting the subset of wave features of the plurality of wave features of the signal.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2021
From: ITAMAR MEDICAL, LTD.
To: ITAMAR MEDICAL SPRY 2021, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Reel/Frame 057326/0340 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 23, 2021
From: SPRY HEALTH, INC.
To: ITAMAR MEDICAL LTD.
Reel/Frame 057260/0358 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 19, 2021
From: ECHO LABS, INC.
To: SPRY HEALTH, INC.
Reel/Frame 057246/0810 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 17, 2017
From: ECHO LABS, INC.
To: SPRY HEALTH, INC.
Reel/Frame 043216/0293 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 9, 2017
From: FERBER, ELAD; COBUT, PIERRE-JEAN; NARAYANAN, RAMKRISHNAN; GUNGOR, DERYA GOL
To: ECHO LABS, INC.
Reel/Frame 041217/0126 →
Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 62262342 · Dec 2, 2015
Provisional Application 62262532 · Dec 3, 2015
Provisional Application 62262540 · Dec 3, 2015
Related Publication 20170156676A1 · Jun 8, 2017
Cited By (5)
US 1,127,209 US 1,140,023 US 12,257,022 US 12,440,128 US 12,495,968