IP Library Granted Patent US 10,558,766
Granted Patent B2
US 10,558,766 · App. 15/392,196 · Granted Feb 11, 2020

Method for Modelica-based system fault analysis at the design stage

Inventors: Bhaskar Saha (Redwood City, CA); Tomonori Honda (Redwood City, CA); Ion Matei (Mountain View, CA); Daniel G. Bobrow (Palo Alto, CA); Johan Dekleer (Los Altos, CA); William C. Janssen (Mountain View, CA); Tolga Kurtoglu (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated
G06F17/5009G05B23/0256G06F11/004G06F11/008G06F17/18G05B23/0243G05B23/0248G06N7/005G06N7/02G06N7/023G06N20/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,558,766
App. No.
15/392,196
Granted
Feb 11, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A new and/or improved method, apparatus and/or system is disclosed which aids in extending correct behavioral models to include fault modes and in fault mode analysis of components and/or systems in simulated model environments, including, e.g., FMEA and FMECA and diagnostic fault tree generation.

Claims (28)

1. A method to predict failure of a system, the method comprising:

analyzing the system to identify fault susceptible components of the system;

augmenting component models of the of the fault susceptible components with fault modes;

using the augmented component models to simulate faults and to determine a system-level severity;

applying parameterized physics-of-failure models corresponding to a root cause of the simulated faults to predict a fault likelihood;

combining the system-level severity with the predicted fault likelihood to predict component degradations over time;

aggregating the predicted component degradations to predict when the system will fail to meet performance requirements; and

deriving a fault tree by simulating fault modes with a varying fault amount.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements further comprises using a set of initial conditions, faults and component ages to determine a conditional probability that the system meets a requirement.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements is used to optimize a design of the system or components, or to optimally select among possible subsystem/component options from vendors.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the design is optimized by an explicit quantitative Fault Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) obtained by combining the system-level severity of faults with the predicted fault likelihood.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements includes a mean time to failure.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements includes a full probability distribution.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements includes a full probabilistic trajectory of system dynamics.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein a fault mode of the fault modes is a short circuit.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein a fault mode of the fault modes is that a shaft is harder to turn than normal.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements is used to select among possible subsystem/component options.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fault amount is linked stochastically to system usage.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fault modes include a worn clutch, and the method further comprises creating a feedback loop that shows how the worn clutch increases a load on an engine to maintain a same velocity for a vehicle.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises creating a feedback loop showing how a fault mode of the fault modes affects a variable.

14. An apparatus to predict failure of a system, the apparatus comprising one or more processors configured for:

analyzing the system to identify fault susceptible components of the system;

augmenting component models of the of the fault susceptible components with fault modes;

using the augmented component models to simulate faults and to determine a system-level severity;

applying parameterized physics-of-failure models to the simulated faults to predict a fault likelihood;

combining the system-level severity with the predicted fault likelihood to predict component degradations over time; and

aggregating the predicted component degradations to predict when the system will fail to meet performance requirements; and

deriving a fault tree by simulating fault modes with a varying fault amount.

Assignments (10)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 14, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 073562/0677 →
SECOND LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 2, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 071785/0550 →
FIRST LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 11, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070824/0001 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT RF 064760/0389 Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 068261/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066741/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 065628/0019 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVAL OF US PATENTS 9356603, 10026651, 10626048 AND INCLUSION OF US PATENT 7167871 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 064038 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 28, 2023
From: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064161/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 22, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064760/0389 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 20, 2023
From: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064038/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 2, 2017
From: SAHA, BHASKAR; BOBROW, DANIEL G.; DEKLEER, JOHAN; JANSSEN, WILLIAM C.; KURTOGLU, TOLGA; MATEI, ION; HONDA, TOMONORI
To: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 041154/0237 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62273805 · Dec 31, 2015
Related Publication 20170193143A1 · Jul 6, 2017