IP Library Granted Patent US 9,935,971
Granted Patent B2
US 9,935,971 · App. 15/421,556 · Granted Apr 3, 2018

Mitigation of virtual machine security breaches

Inventors: Rick A. Hamilton, II (Charlottesville, VA); Jeffrey R. Hoy (Southern Pines, NC); Jenny S. Li (Danbury, CT); Shawn P. Mullen (Buda, TX)
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
H04L63/1441G06F9/45558H04L63/1416H04L63/1433G06F2009/4557G06F2009/45587
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,935,971
App. No.
15/421,556
Granted
Apr 3, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

An approach provides solutions for responding to threats to virtual machines (VMs) and mitigating the risks of potential breaches to VMs that reside in the same neighborhood as VMs that are affected by threats. The approach can provide proactive responsive actions for one or more VMs in a determined neighborhood that help protect those VMs in a selective and prioritized manner.

Claims (46)

1. A method for responding to a threat affecting a virtual machine, comprising:

detecting, by one or more computer processors, a threat affecting a first virtual machine;

responsive to detecting the threat affecting the first virtual machine, determining, by one or more computer processors, a neighborhood of the first virtual machine comprising one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat;

determining, by one or more computer processors, a first responsive action to perform to protect a second virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on a calculated factor for the second virtual machine;

determining, by one or more computer processors, a second responsive action to perform to protect a third virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on a calculated factor for the third virtual machine;

determining, by one or more computer processors, an order in which to perform the first responsive action and second responsive action based upon at least the calculated factors for the second virtual machine and the third virtual machine; and

performing, by one or more computer processors, the first responsive action and the second responsive action in the determined order.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the neighborhood is determined based upon at least logical distances between the first virtual machine and the one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein a logical distance between the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine is calculated based upon at least an extent to which the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine share one or more of: resources, users, domains, networks, storage, applications, hypervisors, and virtual adapters.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first responsive action comprises migrating the second virtual machine to another host computer system, and the second responsive action comprises migrating a workload of the third virtual machine to another virtual machine on a same host computer system as the third virtual machine.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculated factor for the second virtual machine reflects an urgency with which action should be taken to protect the second virtual machine from the detected threat.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the factor for the second virtual machine is calculated based upon at least a logical distance between the second virtual machine and the first virtual machine, and one or more numerical values that reflect a degree of risk of the detected threat spreading from the first virtual machine to the second virtual machine.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating, by one or more computer processors, an urgency factor for the first virtual machine based upon at least one or more of: a value reflecting a level of confidence in one or more security alerts associated with the detected threat, a value reflecting strength of the first virtual machine, a value reflecting an ability of security controls to protect the first virtual machine, a value reflecting risk that multi-tenant security controls cannot isolate the first virtual machine, and a value reflecting elapsed time since the detected threat was detected or since the detected threat occurred; and

calculating, by one or more computer processors, the factor for the second virtual machine based upon at least a logical distance between the second virtual machine and the first virtual machine and the urgency factor for the first virtual machine.

8. A computer program product for responding to a threat affecting a virtual machine, comprising:

one or more computer readable storage media and program instructions stored on the one or more computer readable storage media, the program instructions comprising:

program instructions to detect a threat affecting a first virtual machine;

program instructions to, responsive to detecting the threat affecting the first virtual machine, determine a neighborhood of the first virtual machine comprising one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat;

program instructions to determine a first responsive action to perform to protect a second virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on a calculated factor for the second virtual machine;

program instructions to determine a second responsive action to perform to protect a third virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on a calculated factor for the third virtual machine;

program instructions to determine an order in which to perform the first responsive action and second responsive action based upon at least the calculated factors for the second virtual machine and the third virtual machine; and

program instructions to perform the first responsive action and the second responsive action in the determined order.

9. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the neighborhood is determined based upon at least logical distances between the first virtual machine and the one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat.

10. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein a logical distance between the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine is calculated based upon at least an extent to which the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine share one or more of: resources, users, domains, networks, storage, applications, hypervisors, and virtual adapters.

11. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the first responsive action comprises migrating the second virtual machine to another host computer system, and the second responsive action comprises migrating a workload of the third virtual machine to another virtual machine on a same host computer system as the third virtual machine.

12. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the calculated factor for the second virtual machine reflects an urgency with which action should be taken to protect the second virtual machine from the detected threat.

13. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the factor for the second virtual machine is calculated based upon at least a logical distance between the second virtual machine and the first virtual machine, and one or more numerical values that reflect a degree of risk of the detected threat spreading from the first virtual machine to the second virtual machine.

14. The computer program product of claim 8 , further comprising:

program instructions to calculate an urgency factor for the first virtual machine based upon at least one or more of: a value reflecting a level of confidence in one or more security alerts associated with the detected threat, a value reflecting strength of the first virtual machine, a value reflecting an ability of security controls to protect the first virtual machine, a value reflecting risk that multi-tenant security controls cannot isolate the first virtual machine, and a value reflecting elapsed time since the detected threat was detected or since the detected threat occurred; and

program instructions to calculate the factor for the second virtual machine based upon at least a logical distance between that particular virtual machine and the first virtual machine and the urgency factor for the first virtual machine.

15. A computer system for responding to a threat affecting a virtual machine, comprising:

one or more hardware computer processors;

one or more computer readable storage media; and

program instructions stored on the one or more computer readable storage media for execution by at least one of the one or more processors, the program instructions comprising:

program instructions to detect a threat affecting a first virtual machine;

program instructions to, responsive to detecting the threat affecting the first virtual machine, determine a neighborhood of the first virtual machine comprising one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat;

program instructions to determine a first responsive action to perform to protect a second virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on a calculated factor for the second virtual machine;

program instructions to determine a second responsive action to perform to protect a third virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on a calculated factor for the third virtual machine;

program instructions to determine an order in which to perform the first responsive action and second responsive action based upon at least the calculated factors for the second virtual machine and the third virtual machine; and

program instructions to perform the first responsive action and the second responsive action in the determined order.

16. The computer system of claim 15 , wherein the neighborhood is determined based upon at least logical distances between the first virtual machine and the one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat.

17. The computer system of claim 16 , wherein a logical distance between the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine is calculated based upon at least an extent to which the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine share one or more of: resources, users, domains, networks, storage, applications, hypervisors, and virtual adapters.

18. The computer system of claim 15 , wherein the first responsive action comprises migrating the second virtual machine to another host computer system, and the second responsive action comprises migrating a workload of the third virtual machine to another virtual machine on a same host computer system as the third virtual machine.

19. The computer system of claim 15 , wherein the calculated factor for the second virtual machine reflects an urgency with which action should be taken to protect the second virtual machine from the detected threat.

20. The computer system of claim 15 , wherein the factor for the second virtual machine is calculated based upon at least a logical distance between the second virtual machine and the first virtual machine, and one or more numerical values that reflect a degree of risk of the detected threat spreading from the first virtual machine to the second virtual machine.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 13, 2021
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: KYNDRYL, INC.
Reel/Frame 057885/0644 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2017
From: HAMILTON, RICK A., II; HOY, JEFFREY R.; LI, JENNY S.; MULLEN, SHAWN P.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041143/0852 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 14619140 · Feb 11, 2015
Related Publication 20170142152A1 · May 18, 2017