IP Library Granted Patent US 10,261,202
Granted Patent B2
US 10,261,202 · App. 15/518,813 · Granted Apr 16, 2019

Device and method for mitigating seismic survey interference

Inventor: John Sallas (Plano, TX)
Assignee: CGG SERVICES SAS
G01V1/003G01V1/005G01V1/3808G01V2210/32
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,261,202
App. No.
15/518,813
Granted
Apr 16, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computing system and method for mitigating, in a first seismic survey, cross-talk generated by a second seismic survey. The method includes performing the first seismic survey with a first survey seismic source driven by a first survey pilot sweep, performing the second seismic survey with a second survey seismic source, simultaneously with the first seismic survey, recording with first survey seismic sensors (i) first survey seismic signals that originate from the first survey seismic source and (ii) second survey seismic signals that originate from the second survey seismic source, selecting another first survey pilot sweep, which has less cross-correlation noise with the second survey seismic signals than the first survey pilot sweep, and continuing the first seismic survey with the another first survey pilot sweep.

Claims (48)

1. A method for mitigating, in a first seismic survey, cross-talk generated by a second seismic survey, the method comprising:

performing the first seismic survey with a first survey seismic source driven by a first survey pilot sweep;

performing the second seismic survey with a second survey seismic source, simultaneously with the first seismic survey;

recording with first survey seismic sensors (i) first survey seismic signals that originate from the first survey seismic source and (ii) second survey seismic signals that originate from the second survey seismic source;

selecting another first survey pilot sweep among predetermined first survey pilot sweeps, the another first survey pilot sweep having less cross-correlation noise with the second survey seismic signals than the first survey pilot sweep; and

continuing the first seismic survey with the first survey seismic source driven by the another first survey pilot sweep.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second survey seismic signals are recorded during a listen phase, when the first survey seismic source is stopped.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the selecting comprises:

storing in a memory device, a library including the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps designed for a subsurface being surveyed or a library including sweep parameter settings from which the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps are calculated.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating, for each among the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps, an amount of cross-correlation noise with the second survey seismic signal; and

selecting, as the another first survey pilot sweep, one of the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps that according to the calculating yields the smallest amount of cross-correlation noise with the second survey seismic signals.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps include swept sine waves that are linear and non-linear.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps include swept sine waves that are linear and non-linear and pseudo-random sweeps.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

confirming that the recorded first survey seismic signals include first interference noise due to the second seismic survey.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

recording a noise record while the first survey seismic source is silent;

autocorrelating the noise record to obtain an autocorrelation noise; and

identifying whether a repeated energy emission is present in a power spectrum of the autocorrelation noise.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first and second seismic surveys take place simultaneously in adjacent blocks.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first survey vibratory source is a marine source.

11. A computing device for mitigating, in a first seismic survey, cross-talk generated by a second seismic survey, the computing device comprising:

an interface for receiving (i) first survey seismic signals that originate from a first survey seismic source and (ii) second survey seismic signals that originate from a second survey seismic source, wherein the first survey seismic source is driven by a first survey pilot sweep; and

a processor connected to the interface and configured to,

select another first survey pilot sweep among predetermined first survey pilot sweeps, the another first survey pilot sweep having less cross-correlation noise with the second survey seismic signals than the first survey pilot sweep,

wherein the first survey seismic source is then driven by the another first survey pilot sweep.

12. The device of claim 11 , wherein the second survey seismic signals are recorded during a listen phase, when the first survey seismic source is stopped.

13. The device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

store in a memory device, a library including the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps designed for a subsurface being surveyed or a library including sweep parameter settings from which the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps are calculated.

14. The device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

calculate, for each among the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps, an amount of cross-correlation noise with the second survey seismic signal; and

select, as the another first survey pilot sweep, a first survey pilot sweep one of the predetermined first pilot sweeps that has the smallest amount of cross-correlation noise with the second survey seismic signals.

15. The device of claim 11 , wherein the predetermined first survey sweeps include swept sine waves that are linear and non-linear.

16. The device of claim 11 , wherein the predetermined first survey sweeps include swept sine waves that are linear and non-linear and pseudo-random sweeps.

17. The device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

confirm that the recorded first survey seismic signals include first interference noise from the second seismic survey;

record a noise record while the first survey seismic source is silent;

autocorrelate the noise record to obtain an autocorrelation noise; and

identify whether a repeated energy emission is present in a power spectrum of the autocorrelation noise.

18. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing executable codes which, when executed on a computer, makes the computer perform a method for mitigating, in a first seismic survey, cross-talk generated by a second seismic survey, the instructions comprising:

receiving (i) first survey seismic signals that originate from a first survey seismic source and (ii) second survey seismic signals that originate from a second survey seismic source, wherein the first survey seismic source is driven by a first survey pilot sweep;

selecting another first survey pilot sweep among predetermined first survey pilot sweeps, the another first survey pilot sweep having less cross-correlation noise with the second survey seismic signals than the first survey pilot sweep; and

driving the first survey seismic source with the another first survey pilot sweep.

19. The medium of claim 18 , further comprising:

recording the second survey seismic signals during a listen phase, when the first survey seismic source is stopped.

20. The medium of claim 18 , further comprising:

storing in a memory device, a library including the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps designed for a subsurface being surveyed or a library including sweep parameter settings from which the predetermined first survey pilot sweeps are calculated.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 14, 2022
From: CGG SERVICES SAS
To: SERCEL SAS
Reel/Frame 060190/0750 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 14, 2017
From: CGG SERVICES SA
To: CGG SERVICES SAS
Reel/Frame 042011/0434 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2017
From: SALLAS, JOHN
To: CGG SERVICES SA
Reel/Frame 041996/0351 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62066934 · Oct 22, 2014
Related Publication 20170248710A1 · Aug 31, 2017