IP Library Granted Patent US 11,066,705
Granted Patent B2
US 11,066,705 · App. 15/529,943 · Granted Jul 20, 2021

Characterization of adaptive immune response to vaccination or infection using immune repertoire sequencing

Inventors: Harlan S. Robins (Seattle, WA); William Sumner DeWitt, III (Seattle, WA); Ryan O. Emerson (Seattle, WA)
Assignees: Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
C12Q1/6881C12Q1/6883C12Q1/6886C12Q2600/156
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,066,705
App. No.
15/529,943
Granted
Jul 20, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods of monitoring and measuring dynamic adaptive immune cell responses are provided. High-throughput sequencing of T cell receptor and immunoglobulin loci is used to characterize the breadth of an effector cell response to a stimulus, such as a vaccine or infection. Unique responding effector cell clones and abundance thereof can be determined. Additionally, methods for determining the contribution of responding effector cells to the immunological memory compartment are provided.

Claims (34)

1. A method of measuring T cell response to a vaccine in a subject, comprising:

performing high-throughput sequencing of nucleic acid molecules comprising rearranged CDR3 regions of TCR loci obtained from a first biological sample of the subject at a first time point post vaccination, wherein the first biological sample is obtained at least 10 days post vaccination;

sorting activated T cells from a subset of the first biological sample using flow cytometry to generate a set of activated T cells;

performing high-throughput sequencing of nucleic acid molecules comprising rearranged CDR3 regions of TCR loci obtained from the set of activated T cells; and

identifying activated T cell clones in the set having CDR3 regions of significantly higher proportional abundance in the activated T cell population in comparison to the first biological sample, thereby identifying vaccine-induced responsive clones.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the TCR loci are selected from the group consisting of the TCRα locus, TCRβ locus, TCRγ locus, and TCRδ locus.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the biological samples comprise peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the biological samples comprise memory T cells.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising performing multiplex PCR amplification of genomic templates comprising rearranged CDR3 regions to produce nucleic acid molecules for sequencing.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying comprises calculating a false discovery rate, and wherein the calculating comprises performing a computation on a computer.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the activated T cell clones are vaccine antigen-specific T cells.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the activated T cell clones are CD8 + effector T cells.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the vaccine is a vaccine for an infectious agent or a cancer vaccine.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing high-throughput sequencing of nucleic acid molecules comprising rearranged CDR3 regions of TCR loci obtained from a second biological sample of the subject at a second time point post vaccination; and

identifying newly recruited memory T cell clones corresponding to the vaccine-induced responsive clones that have been recruited to a memory T cell population post vaccination.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the identifying newly recruited memory T cell clones comprises sorting memory T cells by flow cytometry.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein identifying newly recruited memory T cell clones comprises comparing a first set of memory T cell clones in the first biological sample to a second set of memory T cell clones in the second biological sample to identify one or more newly recruited memory T cell clones that have been recruited to the memory T cell population post vaccination.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising comparing the identified one or more newly recruited memory T cell clones with one or more vaccine-induced responsive clones from the set of activated T cells to find matches between the newly recruited memory T cell clones and the one or more vaccine-induced responsive clones.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the matched memory T cell clones are a significant number of the vaccine-induced responsive clones and are identified as biomarkers for vaccine-specific response.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the matched memory T cell clones are a significant proportion of total memory T cell population and are identified as biomarkers for vaccine-specific response.

16. The method of claim 10 , wherein the memory T cell clones are CD8 + CD45RO + CD62L lo effector memory T cells.

17. The method of claim 10 , wherein the memory T cell clones are CD8 + CD45RO + CD62L hi central memory T cells.

18. The method of claim 10 , wherein the second time point is at least 30 days post vaccination.

19. A method of measuring a T cell response to an infection in a subject, comprising:

performing high-throughput sequencing of nucleic acid molecules comprising rearranged CDR3 regions of TCR loci obtained from a first biological sample of the subject at a first time point post infection, wherein the infection is selected from the group consisting of viral infection, bacterial infection, and parasitic infection;

sorting activated T cells from a subset of the first biological sample using flow cytometry to generate a set of activated T cells;

performing high-throughput sequencing of nucleic acid molecules comprising rearranged CDR3 regions of TCR loci obtained from the set of activated T cells; and

identifying activated T cell clones in the set having CDR3 regions of significantly higher proportional abundance in the activated T cell population in comparison to the first biological sample, thereby identifying infection-induced responsive clones.

20. The method of claim 19 , further comprising:

performing high-throughput sequencing of nucleic acid molecules comprising rearranged CDR3 regions of TCR loci obtained from a second biological sample of the subject at a second time point post infection; and

identifying newly recruited memory T cell clones corresponding to the infection-induced responsive clones that are not present in the first biological sample and that have been recruited to a memory T cell population post infection.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein identifying newly recruited memory T cell clones comprises comparing a first set of memory T cell clones in the first biological sample to a second set of memory T cell clones in the second biological sample to identify one or more newly recruited memory T cell clones that have been recruited to the memory T cell population post infection.

22. The method of claim 19 , wherein the viral infection is an acute viral infection.

Assignments (4)
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 27, 2022
From: SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE; FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
To: FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER
Reel/Frame 060982/0053 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Nov 16, 2017
From: FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 044476/0833 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 27, 2017
From: DEWITT, WILLIAM SUMNER, III; EMERSON, RYAN O.
To: ADAPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Reel/Frame 043973/0235 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 27, 2017
From: ROBINS, HARLAN S.
To: FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
Reel/Frame 043973/0374 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62084470 · Nov 25, 2014
Related Publication 20170362653A1 · Dec 21, 2017