Image color data normalization and color matching system for translucent material
A shade selection program is disclosed that predicts the shade choice with the smallest CIEDE2000 color difference for dental composite resin restorations when given a backing and target shade. By utilizing generated regression models, a database of spectral reflectance information, and principles of Kubelka-Munk layering, a highly accurate shade selection program was designed. Additionally, a blending model for quantification of color adjustment potential was developed. Systems and methods for correlating RGB data from the VITA Linearguide 3D Master and VITA Bleached Guide 3D Master shade guides with their spectroradiometric correlates through a regression model while indicating a methodology for validation of accuracy of digital imaging systems are disclosed.
1. A method for color matching of translucent materials, comprising:
acquiring one or more images of a region of interest using a digital imaging device;
applying regression modeling to convert an acquired Red, Green and Blue (RGB) color space value to spectral radiance, spectral reflectivity, absorption, scattering, CIELAB color coordinates, CIELAB XYZ tristimulus values, or any units of the CIE color space while to normalize the RGB color space value to spectroradiometric accuracy;
comparing the converted values to master shade specimen data contained in a database;
selecting one of the master shade specimens that best matches the spectral radiance, spectral reflectivity, absorption, scattering, CIELAB color coordinates, CIELAB XYZ tristimulus values, or any units of the CIE color space value by having a smallest CIEDE2000 color difference relative to the CIELAB color space value of the region of interest, the color difference being further determined in accordance with blending effects by subtracting the overall color difference (ΔE R3:R0) from the color difference due to layering (ΔE TO:TL) in accordance with the relationships:
Color Difference=color difference layering −color difference blending
Color Difference=Δ E R 3: R 0
color difference layering =ΔE TO:TL
color difference blending =ΔE TO:TL−ΔE R 3: R 0
wherein an overall color difference between an inner and an outer was defined as ΔE R3:R0, wherein a color difference due to layering is defined as ΔE TO:TL; and
presenting an indication of the selected one of the master shade specimens to a user in a user interface.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising comparing the normalized RGB value to spectral radiance, spectral reflectivity, absorption, scattering, CIELAB color coordinates, CIELAB XYZ tristimulus values, or any units of the CIE color space associated with the master shade specimens contained in a database and taking into consideration principles of Kubelka-Munk layering on a backing shade to create a target shade or desired shade.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the master shade specimens include sample data from a translucent material of interest.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting a master shade specimen having a CIEDE2000=0 as a result of a query with a same target and backing shade.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the best color match is obtained by layering different master shade specimen colors.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the best color match is obtained by layering and then blending can compensate for error.
7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a color difference in accordance with blending with an outside influence on an inner material as:
color difference blending =ΔE TL 1 R 0
8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing suggestions for multiple layers to provide the best match.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
ranking of shades based on the least CIEDE2000 color difference between the resulting shade and the target shade in accordance with Kubelka-Munk layering to create the color match.