IP Library › Patent Application 15594024
Patent Application
App. No. 15/594,024

SYSTEM & METHOD FOR COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT AND STATISTICALLY ROBUST DESIGN OF MULTI-ARM MULTI-STAGE EXPERIMENTS

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
15/594,024
Abstract

A method and system providing an improved technology for efficiently computing experimental design in strict statistically controlled settings. The method and system utilize a unique combination of statistical algorithms for designing, comparing the performance, and conducting multi-arm, multistage experiments efficiently, while radically reducing the computation time required on a personal computing device, thereby improving computer technology and performance. In particular, the method and system enable personal computing devices to compute very large multi-arm multistage experiments in a significantly reduced period of time. The present invention allows experimentalists to examine in a single statistically controlled experiment a vastly greater range of experimental options, with the possibility of dropping uninformative arms of the experiment, changing goals and parameters during the course of the experiment.

Claims (40)

1 . A method of designing multi-arm multistage (MAMS) experiments, the method comprising:

identifying a MAMS experiment problem;

breaking the MAMS experiment problem into a plurality of independent increments, each independent increment comprising a multi-stage problem;

reducing a dimensionality of the plurality of independent increments using a Score Statistic;

transforming the MAMS experiment problem into a finite integration; and

computing the integration using a quasi-Monte Carlo approach.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method complexity increases linearly based on number of stages and number of arms, as represented by the equation J×D, where J is number of stages and D is number of arms.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method complexity does not increase exponentially based on number of stages and number of arms.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein breaking the MAMS experiment problem into a plurality of independent increments comprises collecting data from the MAMS experiment, and calculating a cumulative score test statistic.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein reducing a dimensionality of the plurality of independent increments using a Score Statistic comprises converting the MAMS experiment problem into J consecutive stages.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein transforming the MAMS experiment problem into a finite integration comprises transforming a correlated normal integration into an integration of independent normal variables, transforming a lower integration limits from negative infinity to zero.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein computing the integration using a quasi-Monte Carlo approach comprises generating lattice points of a lattice, shifting the lattice by a random vector amount, converting to points between zero and one, and evaluating integrand and taking an average.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the computations necessary to create a multi-arm multistage (MAMS) experiments are made iteratively to create many designs for a range of design assumptions, such ranges and parameters being input by a user of the system either from an electronic file or manually.

9 . A system for multistage multi-arm (MAMS) experiments, the system comprising:

a parameter intake, configured to prompt and receive input for experiment design parameters;

a boundaries intake, configured to prompt and receive input for experiment design boundaries;

a simulator engine, configured to receive input parameters comprised of the experiment design parameters and the experiment design boundaries, and further configured to execute simulations determining boundaries efficacy based on the input parameters;

wherein the simulator engine utilizes a method comprising:

breaking a MAMS experiment problem into a plurality of independent increments, each independent increment comprising a three-stage problem;

reducing a dimensionality of the plurality of independent increments using a Score Statistic;

transforming the MAMS experiment problem into a finite integration; and

using a quasi-Monte Carlo number theoretic approach, computing the integration.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the experiment design parameters comprise acceptable error rates, anticipated difference between arms, estimated variance of outcome, and allocation of sample between arms.

11 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the experiment design boundaries comprise select spending function and input spacing of interim looks.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein any number of experimental simulations, resulting from applying the mathematics described for claim 1 iteratively, may be compared in a graphic and/or tabular form within the system and favorable designs selected and retained.

13 . A method of designing a multi-arm multistage (MAMS) experiment, the method comprising:

receiving input parameters comprising experiment design parameters and experiment design boundaries;

computing boundaries;

computing sample size;

executing a first simulation of the MAMS experiment to determine a first set of boundaries efficacy;

modifying one or more input parameters;

executing a second simulation of the MAMS experiment to determine a second set of boundaries efficacy; and

comparing the first set of boundaries efficacy with the second set of boundaries efficacy to identify a preferred boundaries efficacy.

14 . A method for constructing a D-arm J-stage design for N number of stages, the method comprising:

computing a first boundary for a first stage N using a distribution of D-score statistics at the first stage;

incrementing a stage value N by one and advancing to a next stage;

updating the distribution of D-score statistics at a second stage for a second stage N+1;

computing a second boundary for the second stage N+1 using the distribution of D-score statistics at a second stage;

incrementing a stage value N+1 by one and advancing to a next stage; and

continuing incrementing stage values, advancing stages, and updating the distribution of D-score statistics to correspond to the stage values until a stage value is equal to J number of stages.

Assignments (7)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ADD AXIO RESEARCH, LLC AS AN ADDITIONAL ASSIGNOR PARTY PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 055443 FRAME: 0029. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 5, 2021
From: CYTEL INC.; AXIO RESEARCH, LLC; PURPLE SQUIRREL HTA, LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 056136/0625 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 1, 2021
From: ANTARES CAPITAL, LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: CYTEL INC.
Reel/Frame 055442/0450 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 1, 2021
From: CYTEL INC.; PURPLE SQUIRREL HTA, LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 055443/0029 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 30, 2020
From: CYTEL INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP
Reel/Frame 052262/0958 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 30, 2020
From: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: CYTEL INC.
Reel/Frame 052263/0870 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 17, 2019
From: CYTEL INC.
To: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 048910/0165 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 14, 2017
From: GHOSH, PRANAB K.; LIU, LINGYUN; SENCHAUDHURI, PRALAY; MEHTA, CYRUS; GAO, PING; HERBERT, STEVE
To: CYTEL INC.
Reel/Frame 043584/0945 →