IP Library Granted Patent US 11,029,352
Granted Patent B2
US 11,029,352 · App. 15/598,204 · Granted Jun 8, 2021

Unmanned aerial vehicle electromagnetic avoidance and utilization system

Inventors: Fabien Blanc-Paques (San Francisco, CA); Bernard J. Michini (San Francisco, CA); Mark Patrick Bauer (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Skydio, Inc.
G01R29/085B64C39/024G05D1/0094G08G5/0034G08G5/0069G08G5/045B64C2201/123B64C2201/141G08G5/0086
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,029,352
App. No.
15/598,204
Granted
Jun 8, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, systems and apparatus, for an unmanned aerial vehicle electromagnetic avoidance and utilization system. One of the methods includes obtaining a flight package indicating a flight pattern associated with inspecting a structure, the flight pattern causing the UAV to remain at a standoff distance from the structure, wherein the standoff distance is based on an electromagnetic field associated with the structure, and wherein the flight pattern is laterally constrained according to a property geofence associated with a right of way of the structure. The UAV is navigated according to the flight pattern, and the UAV captures images of the structure. For an initial portion of the flight pattern, the UAV navigates at an altitude based on the standoff distance and the property geofence towards the structure. The UAV determines a location at which to capture images of the structure, and the UAV provides the captured images to a user device.

Claims (103)

1. An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system comprising:

one or more processors comprising hardware, the one or more processors configured to perform operations comprising:

determining a standoff distance from a structure based on an electromagnetic field of the structure, wherein the standoff distance is a distance the UAV is to remain from the structure while the UAV is navigating;

determining a flight pattern for the UAV to implement, the flight pattern configured such that the UAV remains at least the determined standoff distance from the structure, and the flight pattern including a predetermined path for the UAV to follow;

navigating the UAV according to the determined flight pattern; and

obtaining sensor data of the structure at multiple aerial positions about the structure.

2. The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising:

during navigation of the UAV, increasing the standoff distance from the structure when the system determines an increased magnetic field strength of the structure.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

navigating the UAV to a first altitude above one or more conductors carried by the structure;

navigating the UAV to descend from the first altitude towards the conductors;

determining information indicative of an electromagnetic field associated with the one or more conductors;

determining, using the information, a second altitude at which the electromagnetic field associated with the one or more conductors affects navigation of the UAV; and

setting the standoff distance based on the second altitude.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

obtaining a magnetic field measurement of the structure;

determining a distance from the structure and a location where the measurement was taken; and

using a model to select a distance for the standoff distance where the selected distance would be at or below a predetermined threshold value.

5. The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising:

preventing flight of the UAV closer to the structure than the standoff distance.

6. The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising:

periodically determining a magnetic interference of the structure; and

adjusting the standoff distance based on the periodically determined magnetic interference.

7. The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising:

measuring by the UAV, a magnetic field strength of a magnetic field of the structure; and

obtaining the geospatial location of the UAV and the magnetic field measurement.

8. The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising:

determining that the UAV has navigated to a distance closer to the structure than the standoff distance; and

causing the UAV to perform a contingency operation.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

receiving, via a user interface of the system, a numerical value for the standoff distance.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining the standoff distance is based on physical information of a model of the structure.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

determining the standoff distance based upon a model describing the electromagnetic field of the structure; and

utilizing the model to determine different standoff distances at various locations along the flight pattern.

12. A non-transitory computer storage medium comprising instructions that when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

determining a standoff distance from a structure based on an electromagnetic field of the structure, wherein the standoff distance is a distance an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is to remain from the structure while the UAV is navigating;

determining a flight pattern for the UAV to implement, the flight pattern configured such that the UAV remains at least the determined standoff distance from the structure, and the flight pattern including a predetermined path for the UAV to follow;

navigating the UAV according to the determined flight pattern; and

obtaining sensor data of the structure at multiple aerial positions about the structure.

13. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 12 , the operations further comprising:

during navigation of the UAV, increasing the standoff distance from the structure when the system determines an increased magnetic field strength of the structure.

14. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 12 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

navigating the UAV to a first altitude above one or more conductors carried by the structure;

navigating the UAV to descend from the first altitude towards the conductors;

determining information indicative of an electromagnetic field associated with the one or more conductors;

determining, using the information, a second altitude at which the electromagnetic field associated with the one or more conductors affects navigation of the UAV; and

setting the standoff distance based on the second altitude.

15. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 12 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

obtaining a magnetic field measurement of the structure;

determining a distance from the structure and a location where the measurement was taken; and

using a model to select a distance for the standoff distance where the selected distance would be at or below a predetermined threshold value.

16. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 12 , the operations further comprising:

preventing flight of the UAV closer to the structure than the standoff distance.

17. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 12 , the operations further comprising:

periodically determining a magnetic interference of the structure; and

adjusting the standoff distance based on the periodically determined magnetic interference.

18. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 12 , the operations further comprising:

measuring by the UAV, a magnetic field strength of a magnetic field of the structure; and

obtaining the geospatial location of the UAV and the magnetic field measurement.

19. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 12 , the operations further comprising:

determining that the UAV has navigated to a distance closer to the structure than the standoff distance; and

causing the UAV to perform a contingency operation.

20. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 12 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

receiving, via a user interface of the system, a numerical value for the standoff distance.

21. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 12 , wherein determining the standoff distance is based on physical information of a model of the structure.

22. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 12 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

determining the standoff distance based upon a model describing the electromagnetic field of the structure; and

utilizing the model to determine different standoff distances at various locations along the flight pattern.

23. A computerized method performed by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system, the method comprising:

determining a standoff distance from a structure based on an electromagnetic field of the structure, wherein the standoff distance is a distance the UAV is to remain from the structure while the UAV is navigating;

determining a flight pattern for the UAV to implement, the flight pattern configured such that the UAV remains at least the determined standoff distance from the structure, and the flight pattern including a predetermined path for the UAV to follow;

navigating the UAV according to the determined flight pattern; and

obtaining sensor data of the structure at multiple aerial positions about the structure.

24. The computerized method of claim 23 , further comprising:

during navigation of the UAV, increasing the standoff distance from the structure when the system determines an increased magnetic field strength of the structure.

25. The computerized method of claim 23 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

navigating the UAV to a first altitude above one or more conductors carried by the structure;

navigating the UAV to descend from the first altitude towards the conductors;

determining information indicative of an electromagnetic field associated with the one or more conductors;

determining, using the information, a second altitude at which the electromagnetic field associated with the one or more conductors affects navigation of the UAV; and

setting the standoff distance based on the second altitude.

26. The computerized method of claim 23 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

obtaining a magnetic field measurement of the structure;

determining a distance from the structure and a location where the measurement was taken; and

using a model to select a distance for the standoff distance where the selected distance would be at or below a predetermined threshold value.

27. The computerized method of claim 23 , further comprising:

preventing flight of the UAV closer to the structure than the standoff distance.

28. The computerized method of claim 23 , further comprising:

periodically determining a magnetic interference of the structure; and

adjusting the standoff distance based on the periodically determined magnetic interference.

29. The computerized method of claim 23 , further comprising:

measuring by the UAV, a magnetic field strength of a magnetic field of the structure; and

obtaining the geospatial location of the UAV and the magnetic field measurement.

30. The computerized method of claim 23 , further comprising:

determining that the UAV has navigated to a distance closer to the structure than the standoff distance; and

causing the UAV to perform a contingency operation.

31. The computerized method of claim 23 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

receiving, via a user interface of the system, a numerical value for the standoff distance.

32. The computerized method of claim 23 , wherein determining the standoff distance is based on physical information of a model of the structure.

33. The computerized method of claim 23 , wherein determining a standoff distance from the structure comprises:

determining the standoff distance based upon a model describing the electromagnetic field of the structure; and

utilizing the model to determine different standoff distances at various locations along the flight pattern.

Assignments (11)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 21, 2025
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK, A DIVISION OF FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
To: SKYDIO, INC.
Reel/Frame 072107/0066 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 21, 2025
From: HERCULES CAPITAL, INC.
To: SKYDIO, INC.
Reel/Frame 072128/0698 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 9, 2021
From: SKYDIO, INC.
To: HERCULES CAPITAL, INC., AS COLLATERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 058081/0677 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 8, 2021
From: SKYDIO, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 058053/0768 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2020
From: KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
To: UNMANNED INNOVATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 053739/0789 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 16, 2020
From: KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLC
To: AIRWARE, LLC
Reel/Frame 053234/0634 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE CONVEYING PARTY DATA WAS ERRONEOUSLY ENTER AS UNMMANED INNOVATIONS, INC. IT SHOULD READ UNMANNED INNOVATIONS, INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 053144 FRAME: 0591. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jul 15, 2020
From: UNMANNED INNOVATION, INC.
To: AIRWARE, LLC
Reel/Frame 053210/0586 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2020
From: AIRWARE, LLC
To: SKYDIO, INC.
Reel/Frame 053144/0633 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2020
From: UNMMANED INNOVATION, INC.
To: AIRWARE, LLC
Reel/Frame 053144/0591 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2018
From: UNMANNED INNOVATION, INC.
To: KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
Reel/Frame 048681/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 18, 2017
From: BLANC-PAQUES, FABIEN; MICHINI, BERNARD J.; BAUER, MARK PATRICK
To: UNMANNED INNOVATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 042426/0506 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62338291 · May 18, 2016
Related Publication 20170336806A1 · Nov 23, 2017
Cited By (2)
US 12,504,454 US 12,625,201