IP Library Granted Patent US 10,586,198
Granted Patent B2
US 10,586,198 · App. 15/625,969 · Granted Mar 10, 2020

Cognitive testing system and method

Inventors: Henry M. Bowles (Alameda, CA); Marcus T. Wichmann (Aurora, CO); Darren B. Chamberlin (Mulgoa, AU)
Assignee: Predictive Safety SRP, Inc.
G06Q10/06398A61B5/0002A61B5/0022A61B5/0077A61B5/0205A61B5/1112A61B5/14542A61B5/16A61B5/162A61B5/165A61B5/18A61B5/4064A61B5/4088A61B5/6898G06F3/0482G06F3/0484G06F3/04812G06F21/36G06Q10/1091G07C9/00007G07C9/00111G07C9/00126G08B21/02G08B21/06G09B5/065G09B7/00G09B7/10G16H10/20G16H15/00H04L63/10H04W12/08A61B5/024A61B5/14532A61B5/4857A61B2503/20A61B2560/0247A61B2562/0204H04W12/00503H04W80/12H04W84/042
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,586,198
App. No.
15/625,969
Granted
Mar 10, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, computer program product, and computing system for administering a first alertness test to determine a first result for a user, wherein the first result is indicative of a first level of alertness of the user at the time of the first alertness test. At least a second alertness test may be administered to determine at least a second result for the user, wherein the at least a second result is indicative of at least a second level of alertness of the user at the time of the at least a second alertness test. The first result is compared to the at least a second result to identify a level of cognitive decline for the user.

Claims (57)

1. A computer-implemented method, executed on a computing device, comprising:

administering, via a user interface of the computing device, a first alertness test to determine a first result for a user, wherein the first result is indicative of a first level of alertness of the user at the time of the first alertness test;

administering, via the user interface, at least a second alertness test to determine at least a second result for the user, wherein the at least a second result is indicative of at least a second level of alertness of the user at the time of the at least a second alertness test; and

comparing the first result to the at least a second result to identify a level of cognitive decline for the user, wherein comparing the first result to the at least a second result to identify a level of cognitive decline for the user includes:

identifying a baseline for the user after the administration of the first alertness test,

modifying the baseline for the user after the administration of the at least a second alertness test, and

determining a rate of change for the baseline to identify the level of cognitive decline for the user;

wherein administering each alertness test to the user includes:

rendering, via the user interface, a plurality of objects for use within the alertness test being administered to the user, and

rendering, via the user interface, a disrupter configured to distract the user.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein administering each alertness test to the user includes:

soliciting a response from the user concerning the plurality of objects;

receiving the response from the user; and

determining the result for the user based, at least in part, upon the response received from the user.

3. The computer implemented method of claim 2 wherein the disrupter includes one or more of:

a visual disrupter;

an audible disrupter; and

a physical disrupter.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the level of cognitive decline for the user is an indicator of a cognitive disorder.

5. A computer program product residing on a non-transitory computer readable medium having a plurality of instructions stored thereon which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising:

administering, via a user interface, a first alertness test to determine a first result for a user, wherein the first result is indicative of a first level of alertness of the user at the time of the first alertness test;

administering, via the user interface, at least a second alertness test to determine at least a second result for the user, wherein the at least a second result is indicative of at least a second level of alertness of the user at the time of the at least a second alertness test; and

comparing the first result to the at least a second result to identify a level of cognitive decline for the user, wherein comparing the first result to the at least a second result to identify a level of cognitive decline for the user includes:

identifying a baseline for the user after the administration of the first alertness test,

modifying the baseline for the user after the administration of the at least a second alertness test, and

determining a rate of change for the baseline to identify the level of cognitive decline for the user;

wherein administering each alertness test to the user includes:

rendering, via the user interface, a plurality of objects for use within the alertness test being administered to the user, and

rendering, via the user interface, a disrupter configured to distract the user.

6. The computer program product of claim 5 wherein administering each alertness test to the user includes:

soliciting a response from the user concerning the plurality of objects;

receiving the response from the user; and

determining the result for the user based, at least in part, upon the response received from the user.

7. The computer program product of claim 6 wherein the disrupter includes one or more of:

a visual disrupter;

an audible disrupter; and

a physical disrupter.

8. The computer program product of claim 5 wherein the level of cognitive decline for the user is an indicator of a cognitive disorder.

9. A computing system including a processor and memory configured to perform operations comprising:

administering, via a user interface, a first alertness test to determine a first result for a user, wherein the first result is indicative of a first level of alertness of the user at the time of the first alertness test;

administering, via the user interface, at least a second alertness test to determine at least a second result for the user, wherein the at least a second result is indicative of at least a second level of alertness of the user at the time of the at least a second alertness test; and

comparing the first result to the at least a second result to identify a level of cognitive decline for the user, wherein comparing the first result to the at least a second result to identify a level of cognitive decline for the user includes:

identifying a baseline for the user after the administration of the first alertness test,

modifying the baseline for the user after the administration of the at least a second alertness test, and

determining a rate of change for the baseline to identify the level of cognitive decline for the user;

wherein administering each alertness test to the user includes:

rendering, via the user interface, a plurality of objects for use within the alertness test being administered to the user, and

rendering, via the user interface, a disrupter configured to distract the user.

10. The computing system of claim 9 wherein administering each alertness test to the user includes:

soliciting a response from the user concerning the plurality of objects;

receiving the response from the user; and

determining the result for the user based, at least in part, upon the response received from the user.

11. The computing system of claim 10 wherein the disrupter includes one or more of:

a visual disrupter;

an audible disrupter; and

a physical disrupter.

12. The computing system of claim 9 wherein the level of cognitive decline for the user is an indicator of a cognitive disorder.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 12, 2024
From: PREDICTIVE SAFETY SRP, INC.
To: RIVA RIDGE MASTER FUND LTD.
Reel/Frame 066737/0247 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2021
From: PREDICTIVE SAFETY SRP, INC.
To: RIVA RIDGE MASTER FUND LTD.
Reel/Frame 056222/0072 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 8, 2017
From: BOWLES, HENRY M; WICHMANN, MARCUS T; CHAMBERLIN, DARREN B
To: PREDICTIVE SAFETY SRP, INC.
Reel/Frame 043532/0762 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62351665 · Jun 17, 2016
Related Publication 20170360350A1 · Dec 21, 2017