IP Library Granted Patent US 10,381,115
Granted Patent B2
US 10,381,115 · App. 15/630,418 · Granted Aug 13, 2019

Systems and methods of adaptive management of caregivers

Inventors: Kourtney Govro (Raymore, MO); Devon Kerns (Savannah, MO); Steven Kent Mills (Overland Park, KS); Kyle Evans (Faucett, MO); Rodney Corn (Anthem, AZ); Tanner Cook (Prairie Village, KS); Kristal Rayson (Independence, MO)
Assignee: Intego Software, LLC
G16H40/20G06Q10/109G16H10/20G16H40/63G16H40/67G06Q10/06398
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,381,115
App. No.
15/630,418
Granted
Aug 13, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for generating a graphical interface and scheduling administrative rounds are presented. The graphical interface may present to an administrator a prioritized list of care providers based on care provider performance, care provider satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and labor data associated with the care provider. A schedule of administrative rounds to counsel the care provider may be presented to the administrator and may be based on the prioritized list, administrator and patient location, and administrator and patient schedule.

Claims (58)

1. A system of presenting a graphical user interface for presenting rounds for a plurality of administrators, the system comprising;

a processor;

an identity input component;

a location sensing component; and

a non-transitory computer readable medium storing computer-executable instructions which, when executed by the processor, perform the steps of:

establishing an identity of a care provider via the identity input component;

establishing an identity of an administrator via the identity input component;

sensing a location of the care provider via the location sensing component;

sensing a location of the administrator via the location sensing component;

collecting provider specific data from a plurality of data classes,

wherein the plurality of data classes includes a provider performance metric, a satisfaction score of the care provider, and a satisfaction score of a patient of the care provider;

collecting labor data for the care provider;

calculating a correlation of the patient satisfaction score to the provider performance metric;

calculating a correlation of the provider performance metric to the provider satisfaction score;

calculating a correlation of the provider-specific data from each data class to the labor data;

prioritizing a need of the care provider for administrative consultation based on the location of the administrator, the location of the care provider, and the provider-specific data;

scheduling the administrative consultation; and

presenting the calculated correlations to the administrator for the administrative consultation.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the location of the care providers is sensed by Wi-Fi.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the provider performance metric is at least partially collected using a mobile device associated with the care provider.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the provider performance metric is at least partially collected by accelerometers on the mobile device.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the patient satisfaction score is determined at least in part by a response to a questionnaire completed by the patient.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the labor data at least partially comprises hours worked.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the step of prioritizing comprises comparing the need of a care provider for administrative consultation at a location to the need of other care providers for administrative consultation at the same location.

8. A method of facilitating an administrative consultation between a care provider and an administrator, comprising the steps of:

sensing a location of the care provider;

collecting provider-specific data from a plurality of data classes, wherein the plurality of data classes includes a provider performance metric, a satisfaction score of the care provider, and a satisfaction score of a patient of the care provider;

collecting labor data for the care provider;

calculating a correlation of the provider-specific data from each data class to the labor data;

prioritizing a need of the care provider for administrative consultation based on the location of the administrator, the location of the care provider, and the provider-specific data;

scheduling the administrative consultation; and

presenting the calculated correlation and the plurality of data classes to the administrator for the administrative consultation.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising calculating a correlation of the patient satisfaction score to the provider performance metric.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising calculating a correlation of the provider performance metric to the provider satisfaction score.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the satisfaction score of the care provider is determined at least in part by a response to a questionnaire completed by the care provider.

12. The method of claim 8 , further comprising notifying the administrator when an emergency or need is detected.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the emergency is an alert from a federal agency.

14. The method of claim 8 , wherein the provider performance metric of the care provider is determined at least in part based on the response time to a patient emergency or need.

15. A method of facilitating an administrative consultation between a care provider and an administrator, comprising the steps of:

sensing a location of the care provider;

sensing a location of the administrator;

collecting provider-specific data from a plurality of data classes, wherein the plurality of data classes includes a provider performance metric, a satisfaction score of the care provider, and a satisfaction score of a patient of the care provider;

collecting labor data for the care provider;

calculating a correlation of the patient satisfaction score to the provider performance metric;

calculating a correlation of the provider performance metric to the provider satisfaction score;

calculating a correlation of the provider-specific data from each data class to the labor data;

prioritizing a need of the care provider for administrative consultation based on the location of the administrator, the location of the care provider, and the provider-specific data;

scheduling the administrative consultation; and

presenting the calculated correlation to the administrator for the administrative consultation.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the administrator is notified of care providers in need of counsel based on the location of the administrator.

17. The method of claim 15 ,

further comprising presenting the care provider a list of performance goals to achieve,

wherein the performance goals are based on a patient's satisfaction feedback.

18. The method of claim 15 ,

further comprising presenting the administrator a list of performance goals of the care provider;

wherein the performance goals of the care provider are based on the care provider's satisfaction feedback.

19. The method of claim 15 , wherein the schedule comprises a time, a date, a location, and the names of all parties to attend.

20. The method of claim 15 , wherein the step of prioritizing comprises comparing the need of the care provider for administrative consultation at a location to the need of other care providers for administrative consultation at a different location.

Assignments (5)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AT REEL/FRAME NO. 55995/0549 Recorded Feb 16, 2022
From: CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE (AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO WF FUND V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
To: INTEGO SOFTWARE, LLC
Reel/Frame 059165/0941 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 21, 2021
From: INTEGO SOFTWARE, LLC
To: CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO WF FUND V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Reel/Frame 055995/0549 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE'S NAME INTEGO SOFTWARE, LLC D/B/A CRITICAL ALERT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 049489 FRAME 0242. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Dec 31, 2020
From: SPHERE3, LLC
To: INTEGO SOFTWARE, LLC D/B/A CRITICAL ALERT
Reel/Frame 054883/0330 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 17, 2019
From: SPHERE3, LLC
To: INTEGO SOFTWARE, D/B/A CRITICAL ALERT
Reel/Frame 049489/0242 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 22, 2017
From: GOVRO, KOURTNEY; KERNS, DEVON; MILLS, STEVEN KENT; EVANS, KYLE; CORN, RODNEY; COOK, TANNER; RAYSON, KRISTAL
To: SPHERE3, LLC
Reel/Frame 042789/0160 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62354866 · Jun 27, 2016
Related Publication 20170372020A1 · Dec 28, 2017