IP Library Granted Patent US 10,397,802
Granted Patent B2
US 10,397,802 · App. 15/644,144 · Granted Aug 27, 2019

Detecting changes at cell sites and surrounding areas using unmanned aerial vehicles

Inventor: Lee Priest (Charlotte, NC)
Assignee: ETAK Systems, LLC
H04W16/22B64C39/024B64D47/08G05D1/0094G05D1/0866G06F3/04815G06T7/0002G06T7/97G06T17/05H04L12/413H04L12/4625H04N7/185H04W24/02B64C2201/027B64C2201/108B64C2201/12B64C2201/127B64C2201/141G01S15/89G01S17/89G06T2200/24G06T2207/30184G06T2210/56G06T2215/16H04W24/10H04W88/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,397,802
App. No.
15/644,144
Granted
Aug 27, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and method for cell site inspection by a cell site operator using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and a processing device include creating an initial computer model of a cell site and surrounding geography at a first point in time, wherein the initial computer model represents a known good state of the cell site and the surrounding geography; providing the initial computer model to one or more of the UAV and the processing device; capturing current data of the cell site and the surrounding geography at a second point in time using the UAV; comparing the current data to the initial computer model by the processing device; and identifying variances between the current data and the initial computer model, wherein the variances comprise differences at the cell site and the surrounding geography between the first point in time and the second point in time.

Claims (43)

1. A method for cell site inspection by a cell site operator using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and a processing device, the method comprising:

utilizing the UAV to capture initial data of a cell site and surrounding geography;

creating an initial computer model of the cell site and surrounding geography from the initial data, wherein the initial computer model represents a known good state of the cell site and the surrounding geography at a first point in time, and wherein the initial computer model is a three-dimensional (3D) model defined by an initial point cloud;

utilizing the UAV to capture current data of the cell site and the surrounding geography;

creating a current computer model of the cell site and surrounding geography from the current data, wherein the current computer model represents the condition of the cell site and surrounding geography at a second point in time after the first point in time, and wherein the current computer model is a 3D model defined by a second point cloud;

comparing the second point cloud of the current computer model to the initial point cloud of the initial computer model by the processing device; and

identifying variances between the second point cloud of the current computer model and the initial point cloud of the initial computer model by the processing device, wherein the variances comprise differences in the condition of the cell site and the surrounding geography between the first point in time and the second point in time.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

specifically describing the variances based on comparing the second point cloud of the current computer model and the initial point cloud of the initial computer model, wherein the variances comprise any of changes to a cell tower, changes to cell site components on the cell tower, ground hazards, state of an access road, and landscape changes in the surrounding geography.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the initial computer model is determined as part of one of a close-out audit and a site inspection where it is determined that the initial computer model represents the known good state.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein a flight plan of the UAV around a cell tower is based on a type of the cell tower comprising any of a self-support tower, a monopole tower, and a guyed tower.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the initial computer model is a three-dimensional (3D) model viewed in a Graphical User Interface, and wherein the method further comprises:

creating a second 3D model based on the current data and utilizing the second 3D model if it is determined that the cell site is in the known good state based on the current data.

6. A processing device for cell site inspection by a cell site operator using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), the processing device comprising:

a network interface and a processor communicatively coupled to one another; and

memory storing instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to

receive initial data captured by the UAV of a cell site and surrounding geography;

create an initial computer model from the initial data captured by the UAV, wherein the initial computer model represents a known good state of the cell site and the surrounding geography at a first point in time, and wherein the initial computer model is a three-dimensional (3D) model defined by an initial point cloud;

receive current data captured by the UAV of the cell site and the surrounding geography;

creating a current computer model from the current data captured by the UAV, wherein the current computer model represents the condition of the cell site and surrounding geography at a second point in time after the first point in time, and wherein the current computer model is a 3D model defined by a second point cloud;

compare the second point cloud of the current computer model to the initial point cloud of the initial computer model; and

identify variances between the second point cloud of the current computer model and the initial point cloud of the initial computer model, wherein the variances comprise differences in the condition of the cell site and the surrounding geography between the first point in time and the second point in time.

7. The processing device of claim 6 , wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to

specifically describe the variances based on comparing the second point cloud of the current computer model and the initial point cloud of the initial computer model, wherein the variances comprise any of changes to a cell tower, changes to cell site components on the cell tower, ground hazards, state of an access road, and landscape changes in the surrounding geography.

8. The processing device of claim 6 , wherein the initial computer model is determined as part of one of a close-out audit and a site inspection where it is determined that the initial computer model represents the known good state.

9. The processing device of claim 6 , wherein a flight plan of the UAV around a cell tower is based on a type of the cell tower comprising any of a self-support tower, a monopole tower, and a guyed tower.

10. The processing device of claim 6 , wherein the initial computer model is a three-dimensional (3D) model viewed in a Graphical User Interface, and wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to

create a second 3D model based on the current data and use the second 3D model if it is determined that the cell site is in the known good state based on the current data.

11. A non-transitory computer readable medium including instructions that, when executed, cause one or more processors to perform the steps of:

receiving initial data captured by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) of a cell site and surrounding geography;

creating an initial computer model of the cell site and surrounding geography from the data received by the UAV, wherein the initial computer model represents a known good state of the cell site and the surrounding geography at a first point in time, and wherein the initial computer model is a three-dimensional (3D) model defined by an initial point cloud;

receiving current data captured by the UAV of the cell site and the surrounding geography;

creating a current computer model of the cell site and surrounding geography from the current data, wherein the current computer model represents the condition of the cell site and surrounding geography at a second point in time after the first point in time, and wherein the current computer model is a 3D model defined by a second point cloud;

comparing the second point cloud of the current computer model to the initial point cloud of the initial computer model; and

identifying variances between the second point cloud of the current computer model and the initial point cloud of the initial computer model, wherein the variances comprise differences in the condition of the cell site and the surrounding geography between the first point in time and the second point in time.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the one or more processors to perform the step of:

describing the variances based on a comparison between the second point cloud of the current computer model and the initial point cloud of the initial computer model, wherein the variances comprise any of changes to a cell tower, changes to cell site components positioned on the cell tower, newly recognized ground hazards, changes to the state of an access road, and changes to landscape in the surrounding geography.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the one or more processors to create the initial computer model as part of one of a close-out audit or a site inspection where the initial computer model is determined to represent the known good state.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium 11 , wherein a flight plan of the UAV around a cell tower is based on a type of the cell tower comprising any of a self-support tower, a monopole tower, and a guyed tower.

15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the one or more processors to perform the steps of:

displaying the initial computer model as the 3D model in a Graphical User Interface;

creating a second 3D model based on the current data; and

utilizing the second 3D model if it is determined that the cell site is in the known good state based on the current data.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 24, 2026
From: KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
To: ETAK SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 074818/0664 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 20, 2026
From: ETAK SYSTEMS, LLC
To: AQUARIAN CREDIT FUNDING LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 075246/0859 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 22, 2021
From: ETAK SYSTEMS, LLC
To: KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 056003/0641 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2017
From: PRIEST, LEE
To: ETAK SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 042933/0421 →
Continuity (12)
Continuation In Part 15597320 · May 17, 2017
Continuation In Part 15480792 · Apr 6, 2017
Continuation In Part 15469841 · Mar 27, 2017
Continuation In Part 15415040 · Jan 25, 2017
Continuation In Part 15338700 · Oct 31, 2016
Continuation In Part 15283699 · Oct 3, 2016
Continuation In Part 15241239 · Aug 19, 2016
Continuation In Part 15211483 · Jul 15, 2016
Continuation In Part 15168503 · May 31, 2016
Continuation In Part 15160890 · May 20, 2016
Continuation In Part 14685720 · Apr 14, 2015
Related Publication 20170318477A1 · Nov 2, 2017
Cited By (11)
US 12,430,850 US 12,461,505 US 12,462,668 US 12,485,551 US 12,491,643 US 12,491,992 US 12,570,401 US 12,573,287 US 12,686,135 US 12,691,590 US 12,697,735