IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,311,872
Granted Patent B2
US 10,311,872 · App. 15/659,016 · Granted Jun 4, 2019

Utterance classifier

Inventors: Nathan David Howard (Mountain View, CA); Gabor Simko (Santa Clara, CA); Maria Carolina Parada San Martin (Boulder, CO); Ramkarthik Kalyanasundaram (Cupertino, CA); Guru Prakash Arumugam (Sunnyvale, CA); Srinivas Vasudevan (Mountain View, CA)
Assignee: Google LLC
G10L15/22G10L15/16G10L15/18G10L15/30G10L2015/223
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,311,872
App. No.
15/659,016
Filed
Jul 25, 2017
Granted
Jun 4, 2019
Kind
B2
Examiner
HAN, QI
Art Unit
2659
USPC
704/232
Abstract

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media for classification using neural networks. One method includes receiving audio data corresponding to an utterance. Obtaining a transcription of the utterance. Generating a representation of the audio data. Generating a representation of the transcription of the utterance. Providing (i) the representation of the audio data and (ii) the representation of the transcription of the utterance to a classifier that, based on a given representation of the audio data and a given representation of the transcription of the utterance, is trained to output an indication of whether the utterance associated with the given representation is likely directed to an automated assistance or is likely not directed to an automated assistant. Receiving, from the classifier, an indication of whether the utterance corresponding to the received audio data is likely directed to the automated assistant or is likely not directed to the automated assistant. Selectively instructing the automated assistant based at least on the indication of whether the utterance corresponding to the received audio data is likely directed to the automated assistant or is likely not directed to the automated assistant.

Claims (68)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, by an automated assistant device of a classification system that includes (i) a classifier server, and (ii) the automated assistant device, audio data corresponding to an utterance;

obtaining, by the classifier server, a transcription of the utterance;

generating, by the classifier server, an acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data;

generating, by the classifier server, an acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance;

providing, by the classifier server, (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance to a neural-network-based classifier that, based on a given acoustic feature vector corresponding to audio data and a given acoustic feature vector corresponding to a transcription of an utterance, is trained to output an indication of whether a given utterance associated with the given acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data is likely directed to an automated assistant or is likely not directed to an automated assistant;

determining, by the classifier server, that the classifier has output an indication that the utterance corresponding to the received audio data is likely directed to the automated assistant;

instructing, by the classifier server, the automated assistant device to generate a response to the utterance based at least on the indication that the utterance corresponding to the received audio data is likely directed to the automated assistant;

generating, by the automated assistant device and for output, the response to the utterance based on the instruction by the classifier server; and

providing, by the automated assistant device, the generated response for output.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein providing (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance to the classifier, further comprises:

generating an input acoustic feature vector corresponding to a concatenation between (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the utterance; and

providing the concatenated input acoustic feature vector to the classifier.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein generating the input acoustic feature vector corresponding to the concatenation between (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance, further comprises:

generating one or more numeric vectors converted from one or more words recognized in the transcription of the utterance; and

generating a matrix of numeric vectors comprising the one or more numeric vectors to provide to the classifier.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising:

receiving, from a speech recognizer at a word embedding model, recognizable text corresponding to the utterance;

generating, at the word embedding model, the transcription of the utterance from the recognizable text; and

providing, from the word embedding model, the transcription of the utterance to the classifier.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data comprises acoustic mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) values.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising:

providing, by a max pooling layer of the word embedding model, the transcription of the utterance comprising embedding units;

providing, by an acoustic neural network, the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data comprising audio units;

concatenating the embedding units and the audio units to a representation unit input; and

providing the representation unit input as input to the classifier.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the classifier server is in communication with the automated assistant device over a network.

8. A classification system that includes (i) a classifier server, and (ii) an automated assistant device, the classification system comprising:

one or more computers and one or more storage devices storing instructions that are operable, when executed by the one or more computers, to cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

receiving, by the automated assistant device, audio data corresponding to an utterance;

obtaining, by the classifier server, a transcription of the utterance;

generating, by the classifier server, an acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data;

generating, by the classifier server, an acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance;

providing, by the classifier server, (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance to a neural-network-based classifier that, based on a given acoustic feature vector corresponding to audio data and a given acoustic feature vector corresponding to a transcription of an utterance, is trained to output an indication of whether a given utterance associated with the given acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data is likely directed to an automated assistant or is likely not directed to an automated assistant;

determining, by the classifier server, that the classifier has output an indication that the utterance corresponding to the received audio data is likely directed to the automated assistant;

instructing, by the classifier server, the automated assistant device to generate a response to the utterance based at least on the indication that the utterance corresponding to the received audio data is likely directed to the automated assistant;

generating, by the automated assistant device and for output, the response to the utterance based on the instruction by the classifier server; and

providing, by the automated assistant device, the generated response for output.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein providing (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance to the classifier, further comprises:

generating an input acoustic feature vector corresponding to a concatenation between (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the utterance; and

providing the concatenated input acoustic feature vector to the classifier.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein generating the input acoustic feature vector corresponding to the concatenation between (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance, further comprises:

generating one or more numeric vectors converted from one or more words recognized in the transcription of the utterance; and

generating a matrix of numeric vectors comprising the one or more numeric vectors to provide to the classifier.

11. The system of claim 9 , further comprising:

receiving, from a speech recognizer at a word embedding model, recognizable text corresponding to the utterance;

generating, at the word embedding model, the transcription of the utterance from the recognizable text; and

providing, from the word embedding model, the transcription of the utterance to the classifier.

12. The system of claim 11 , further comprising:

providing, by a max pooling layer of the word embedding model, the transcription of the utterance comprising embedding units;

providing, by an acoustic neural network, the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data comprising audio units;

concatenating the embedding units and the audio units to a representation unit input; and

providing the representation unit input as input to the classifier.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data comprises acoustic mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) values.

14. The system of claim 8 , wherein the classifier server is in communication with the automated assistant device over a network.

15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing software comprising instructions executable by one or more computers which, upon such execution, cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

receiving, by an automated assistant device of a classification system that includes (i) a classifier server, and (ii) the automated assistant device, audio data corresponding to an utterance;

obtaining, by the classifier server, a transcription of the utterance;

generating, by the classifier server, an acoustic feature vector corresponding to of the audio data;

generating, by the classifier server, an acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance;

providing, by the classifier server, (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance to a neural-network-based classifier that, based on a given acoustic feature vector corresponding to audio data and a given acoustic feature vector corresponding to a transcription of an utterance, is trained to output an indication of whether a given utterance associated with the given acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data is likely directed to an automated assistant or is likely not directed to an automated assistant;

determining, by the classifier server, that the classifier has output an indication that the utterance corresponding to the received audio data is likely directed to the automated assistant;

instructing, by the classifier server, the automated assistant device to generate a response to the utterance based at least on the indication that the utterance corresponding to the received audio data is likely directed to the automated assistant;

generating, by the automated assistant device and for output, the response to the utterance based on the instruction by the classifier server; and

providing, by the automated assistant device, the generated response for output.

16. The computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein providing (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the transcription of the utterance to the classifier, further comprises:

generating an input acoustic feature vector corresponding to a concatenation between (i) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the audio data and (ii) the acoustic feature vector corresponding to the utterance; and

providing the concatenated input acoustic feature vector to the classifier.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 20, 2017
From: GOOGLE INC.
To: GOOGLE LLC
Reel/Frame 044567/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 25, 2017
From: HOWARD, NATHAN DAVID; SIMKO, GABOR; PARADA SAN MARTIN, MARIA CAROLINA; KALYANASUNDARAM, RAMKARTHIK; ARUMUGAM, GURU PRAKASH; VASUDEVAN, SRINIVAS
To: GOOGLE INC.
Reel/Frame 043093/0582 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20190035390A1 · Jan 31, 2019
Cited By (3)
US 12,248,864 US 12,488,072 US 12,738,268