IP Library Granted Patent US 10,620,100
Granted Patent B2
US 10,620,100 · App. 15/659,396 · Granted Apr 14, 2020

Non-contact velocity measurement instruments and systems, and related methods

Inventors: Jeffrey M. Lacy (Idaho Falls, ID); James A. Smith (Idaho Falls, ID)
Assignee: Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC
G01N3/32B23K26/356G01B5/28G01N3/06G01Q40/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,620,100
App. No.
15/659,396
Granted
Apr 14, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods for calibration of non-contact velocity measurements and systems for implementing the same are described. Generally, the method comprises inducing a shock wave into a sample at a stress intensity that varies across the sample's elastic limit, which corresponds to the elastic-plastic state transition of the sample. That transition state may be at the sample's Hugoniot elastic limit. The velocity of the sample is measured using a non-contact velocity measurement instrument such as a velocimeter. The measurement may be compared to a predicted velocity or a velocity measurement made by another system to determine calibration parameters.

Claims (60)

1. A method comprising:

inducing a wave into a sample to stress the sample at or above an elastic limit;

measuring a particle velocity while the sample is stressed at or above the elastic limit;

comparing the measured particle velocity to a predicted velocity; and

determining one or more calibration parameters responsive to the comparison.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the elastic limit is substantially at an elastic-plastic state transition of the sample.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the elastic limit is a Hugoniot elastic limit of the sample.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein measuring the particle velocity associated with the elastic limit comprises measuring by a velocimetry system.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the velocimetry system is one of a laser-based system, a Fabry-Perot interferometer, and Doppler velocimeter.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising calibrating a measurement system responsive to the comparison.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the one or more calibration parameters comprises a fit function.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the wave is induced in a manner selected from the group consisting of a laser, projectile, explosion, hammer, and plate impact.

9. A method comprising:

inducing a wave into a sample to stress the sample at or above an elastic limit;

measuring a particle velocity while the sample is stressed at or above the elastic limit by a first measurement system;

comparing the measured particle velocity to a second particle velocity measured by a second measurement system; and

determining one or more calibration parameters for the first measurement system responsive to the comparison.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

determining one or more calibration parameters for the second measurement system responsive to the comparison.

11. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

inducing a second wave into a second sample to stress the second sample at or above an elastic limit; and

measuring the second particle velocity while the second sample is stressed at or above the elastic limit by the second measurement system.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the elastic limit is substantially at an elastic-plastic state transition of a wave propagating in the sample.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the elastic limit is a Hugoniot elastic limit of the sample.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the first measurement system and the second measurement system are velocimetry measurement systems.

15. The method of claim 9 , the second measurement system is a standardized velocimetry system and the first measurement system is aligned with the second measurement system.

16. A system, comprising:

a stress generation source configured to induce a stress on a sample at or above an elastic limit of the sample;

a non-contact measurement instrument configured to:

obtain a first particle velocity measurement by measuring a particle velocity of the sample as it is stressed at or above the elastic limit of the sample;

compare the first particle velocity measurement to a second particle velocity measurement; and

determine one or more calibration parameters responsive to the comparison.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the elastic limit is substantially at an elastic-plastic state transition of a wave propagating in the sample.

18. The system of claim 16 , wherein the elastic limit is the Hugoniot elastic limit of the sample.

19. The system of claim 16 , wherein the second particle velocity measurement is a predicted measurement value, or a velocity measurement based on a measurement by a second non-contact measurement instrument.

20. The system of claim 16 , wherein measuring the particle velocity of the sample comprises measuring a time-varying stress field within the sample.

21. The system of claim 20 , wherein measuring the time-varying stress field within the sample comprises measuring the particle velocity at a free surface of the sample.

22. The system of claim 16 , wherein the non-contact measurement instrument is configured to generate a laser to interrogate the sample, and the stress generation source is arranged to induce a shock wave at substantially a same location on the sample as the laser interrogates the sample.

23. The system of claim 16 , wherein the non-contact measurement instrument is configured to generate a laser to interrogate the sample, and the stress generation source is arranged relative to the sample to induce a shock wave at a first location on the sample and the non-contact measurement instrument is arranged relative to the sample to interrogate the sample at a second location on the sample, wherein the first location and the second location are on opposite sides of the sample.

24. A method comprising:

inducing a wave into a sample to stress the sample at or above an elastic limit;

measuring a particle velocity while the sample is stressed at or above the elastic limit by a first measurement system;

determining an elastic limit of a material responsive to the measured particle velocity;

determining a mechanical property of the material responsive to the determined elastic limit; and

determining a change in the mechanical property of the material responsive to a change in a Hugoniot elastic limit.

25. The method of claim 24 , further comprising determining a change in the mechanical property of the material responsive to the determined elastic limit.

26. The method of claim 24 , further comprising adjusting the measured particle velocity responsive to a calibration parameter.

27. The method of claim 26 , wherein the calibration parameter comprises one or more of a fit function and operating parameters of the first measurement system.

28. The method of claim 24 , wherein the elastic limit is a transition phase of the wave, the transition phase comprising an inelastic wave interfering with an elastic wave.

29. A system, comprising:

a sample; and

a monitoring system configured to monitor the sample by:

inducing a wave into the sample to stress the sample at or above an elastic limit;

measuring a particle velocity while the sample is stressed at or above the elastic limit by a measurement system;

determining an elastic limit of a material responsive to the measured particle velocity;

determining a mechanical property of the material responsive to the determined elastic limit; and

determining a change in the mechanical property of the material responsive to a change in a Hugoniot elastic limit.

30. The system of claim 29 , wherein the monitoring system is configured to monitor microstructures.

31. The system of claim 29 , wherein the monitoring system is configured to characterize materials undergoing one or more of high temperature, radiation fields, work hardening, tempering, fatigue.

32. The system of claim 29 , wherein the monitoring system is configured to perform hardness testing.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Dec 31, 2018
From: BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE/IDAHO NAT'L LAB
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 047995/0266 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2017
From: LACY, JEFFREY M.; SMITH, JAMES A.
To: BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLC
Reel/Frame 043099/0006 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62367015 · Jul 26, 2016
Related Publication 20180031459A1 · Feb 1, 2018