Optimizing aggregation routing over a network

1. A method for optimizing aggregation routing over a network, the method comprising:

detecting that aggregated account data is unavailable over a network from a first data aggregator server;

analyzing multiple data aggregator servers to determine which of the multiple data aggregator servers is optimal for the aggregated account data;

selecting a second data aggregator server from among the multiple data aggregator servers as the optimal data aggregator server;

formatting a request, from a user, for the aggregated account data to be compatible with the second data aggregator server;

routing the formatted request over the network to the second data aggregator server; and

receiving the requested aggregated account data over the network from the second data aggregator server.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the analyzing of the multiple data aggregator servers to determine which of the multiple data aggregator servers is optimal includes:

determining delivery attributes for each of the multiple data aggregator servers; and

comparing the aggregated account data to the delivery attributes of each of the multiple data aggregator servers to determine if a comparison threshold is met for a particular one of the multiple data aggregator servers.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

if the comparison threshold is not met for any of the multiple data aggregator servers, then adjusting the comparison threshold so that the adjusted comparison threshold is met for the particular one of the multiple data aggregator servers prior to selecting the particular one of the multiple data aggregator servers as the optimal data aggregator server.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the comparison threshold corresponds to delivery speed of account data received from each of the multiple data aggregator servers.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the comparison threshold corresponds to costs of account data received from each of the multiple data aggregator servers.

6. The method of claim 2 , wherein the comparison threshold corresponds to an amount of history of account data received from each of the multiple data aggregator servers.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the request for the aggregated account data originates from personal financial manager (PFM) software of the user.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising normalizing the received aggregated account data.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising receiving a predetermined data scale for normalizing the received aggregated account data for use in normalizing the received aggregated account data.

10. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing one or more programs that are configured, when executed, to cause one or more processors to perform the method of claim 1 .

11. A method for optimizing aggregation routing over a network, the method comprising:

detecting that aggregated account data is unavailable over a network from a data aggregator server;

determining delivery attributes for each of multiple other data aggregator servers that are available over the network; and

comparing the aggregated account data to the delivery attributes of each of the multiple other data aggregator servers to determine if a comparison threshold is met for the particular one of the multiple other data aggregator servers to determine that a particular one of the multiple other data aggregator servers is an optimal data aggregator server for the aggregated account data;

formatting a request for the aggregated account data to be compatible with the optimal data aggregator server;

routing the formatted request over the network to the optimal data aggregator server; and

receiving the requested aggregated account data over the network from the optimal data aggregator server.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

if the comparison threshold is not met for any of the multiple other data aggregator servers, then adjusting the comparison threshold so that the adjusted comparison threshold is met for the particular one of the multiple other data aggregator servers prior to selecting the particular one of the multiple other data aggregator servers as the optimal data aggregator server.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the comparison threshold corresponds to: delivery speed of account data received from each of the multiple other data aggregator servers, costs of account data received from each of the multiple other data aggregator servers, or an amount of history of account data received from each of the multiple other data aggregator servers, or some combination thereof.

14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

receiving a predetermined data scale for normalizing the received aggregated account data for use in normalizing the received aggregated account data; and

normalizing the received aggregated account data.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the request for the aggregated account data originates from personal financial manager (PFM) software.

16. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

analyzing the multiple other data aggregator servers to determine which of the multiple other data aggregator servers is a second optimal data aggregator server for the aggregated account data; and

prioritizing the aggregated account data received from the optimal data aggregator server over the aggregated account data received from the second optimal data aggregator server.

17. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing one or more programs that are configured, when executed, to cause one or more processors to perform the method of claim 11 .